Dilemma
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
Context
The contemporary dispute over sex and gender — what bathrooms people use, what categories sports leagues recognise, what language schools and medical institutions employ — is loud and polarising, but the disagreement at the bottom is not primarily political. It is about what sex and gender fundamentally are: real biological categories, social constructions, relational identities, family-resemblance concepts, or perspectival distinctions within a deeper unity. Schools across the atlas split on this question along the same lines they split on every other 'what is X really?' question — and like marriage and personhood, the political conclusion doesn't fall directly out of the ontological position.
Why it matters
How a tradition answers determines which institutions and practices it counts as tracking something real, which it counts as conventional choices to revisit, and what moral weight transgressions of sex/gender categories carry. As always, ontological commitments and political commitments are linked but not identical: schools sharing a stance here can differ sharply on what they think the substantive content of the relevant category is, and schools differing on the ontology can converge on shared practical positions.
The coordinates that split the schools
The stances
Sex is a real biological kind with given content.
75 schoolsOn this view, biological sex is a real feature of human organisms — gametes, chromosomes, reproductive role — with a content given by reproductive biology rather than by social practice. Gender categories that track the underlying biology are tracking something real; categories that don't are misdescribing it.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. on When does a person begin?
- 1% Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. on What is marriage?
- 1% Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. on What is money?
- 1% A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. on What is a nation?
- 1% Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. on Should we edit the human germline?
Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition.
11 schoolsOn relational views, identity is not a property a person has alone; it is constituted by the web of recognition the person sits in. What makes someone a man or a woman in any thick sense is the relations of kinship, community, ritual, and recognition that embed the person — not a feature of the person considered apart.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation. on When does a person begin?
- 1% Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates. on What is marriage?
- 1% Money is the ledger of obligations among real people. on What is money?
- 1% A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people. on What is a nation?
- 1% Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric. on Should we edit the human germline?
“Male” and “female” are family-resemblance terms — no single essence.
15 schoolsOn this view, the everyday categories of male and female pick out overlapping clusters of features — anatomy, physiology, social role, self-understanding, behaviour — that do not reduce to a single essence. The categories are useful but lossy; the demand for a single definition is misplaced.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% The question presupposes a fact of the matter that isn’t there. on When does a person begin?
- 1% “Marriage” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. on What is marriage?
- 1% “Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. on What is money?
- 1% “Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together. on What is a nation?
- 1% 'Human nature' is a cluster term without a single essence; the editing question is empirical, not metaphysical. on Should we edit the human germline?
The distinction is conventional within a deeper non-dual reality.
13 schoolsOn non-dual views, the distinctness of male and female — like every binary distinction between apparent selves — is a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. Particular sex and gender designations operate at the conventional level where most of life is lived; at the ultimate level the distinction is one more pattern in the play of forms.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Individuality dissolves into the One. on What happens to "you" when you die?
- 1% From the standpoint of the One, the question doesn’t apply in the form it is asked. on When does a person begin?
- 1% All union is participation in the One — particular forms are conventional. on What is marriage?
- 1% Money's apparent diversity is convention over a single underlying value. on What is money?
- 1% Nations are conventional partitions of a single humanity. on What is a nation?
Schools the coordinates don't place
These schools don't satisfy any stance's coordinate pattern strongly enough to be assigned — either because they decline to commit on the question (Confucianism is famously silent on what comes after; Pyrrhonian and pragmatist traditions suspend judgment), or because their attribute signature crosses categories in a way the five buckets don't capture.
Related Experiments
Experiments engaging the same dimensions as this dilemma — they\'re where the same questions get stress-tested in cleaner cases.
Related Films
Films engaging the same dimensions as this dilemma.
Related Historical Debates
Historical confrontations where parties argued out questions on these dimensions.