School #112

Communitarianism

Late twentieth-century political and ethical philosophy (MacIntyre *After Virtue* 1981; Sandel; Walzer; Taylor; Bellah); roots in Aristotle, Hegel, and the conservative-Romantic critique of Enlightenment liberalism.

Communitarianism is the position that human beings are constitutively members of communities — families, neighbourhoods, religious bodies, nations — and that ethical and political reasoning that abstracts from these memberships produces both philosophical confusion and political damage. It is the chief late-twentieth-century alternative to atomistic and contractualist liberalism.

Worldview

Persons are constituted in their relationships and traditions; the unencumbered self of liberal theory is an abstraction; political and ethical life proceed from inside concrete communities with their own goods.

Moral Implications

Moral claims are intelligible from within particular traditions of practice and only with difficulty translated across them. The virtues, the practices that sustain them, and the institutions that house both are the proper subjects of ethical reflection.

Practical Implications

Communitarianism has shaped contemporary political philosophy, the rehabilitation of virtue ethics, debates over multiculturalism and pluralism, and the politics of religious-traditional pluralism. It has been critiqued for risks of parochialism and for difficulty handling injustices internal to the communities it celebrates.

I. Time

Time, in the communitarian frame, is intergenerational — Burke's 'partnership between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born'. A community exists across time, and the present generation's task is to receive what it has been given, to live within it, and to transmit it improved rather than dissipated. MacIntyre's account of the 'narrative unity of a human life' lived within a tradition extends the same temporal commitment to individual ethics. The framework's reading of time as substantival follows: time is real and the medium of tradition's transmission. Communitarianism therefore reads the acceleration and presentism of late-modern liberal culture as a real loss of temporal depth, and the patient rebuilding of intergenerational practice as the proper response.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space, for the communitarian, is the concrete locale — neighbourhood, parish, town, region — within which constitutive memberships are actually lived. Sandel's critique of the 'unencumbered self' and Bellah's 'Habits of the Heart' both insist that meaningful life requires actual places where people know one another, share institutions, and inherit a sense of belonging. The framework's reading of space as relational follows: space is constituted by the communities that inhabit it, not given as a neutral container into which liberal individuals could be relocated without loss. Communitarianism therefore resists the spatial logic of late modernity (the suburb, the commuter exurb, the airport-hotel-conference circuit) as a real corrosion of the conditions of communal life. The defence of locality is itself a moral commitment.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter is relational: the material world of the communitarian is the village, the church, the workshop, the field, the table — places and things constituted as meaningful by the communities that inhabit and tend them. The 'cathedral' for Burke, the 'parish' for Chesterton, the 'practice' for MacIntyre, are not bare material assemblages but socially constituted realities. The framework's relational reading follows: matter is real, but its significance is constituted within the web of communal practice that gives it its place. Communitarianism therefore resists both the reduction of material things to commodity (the liberal-market move) and the abstraction of social analysis from material life (the academic temptation). The shared table, the inherited tool, the sacred ground are paradigm cases.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Observers are constituted by their memberships. The "unencumbered self" of liberal theory is treated as a philosophical fiction; concrete persons are embedded in families, traditions, and practices that supply the content of their moral lives.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Mediated Retainment of Knowledge: Partial Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: None Moral Authority: Tradition Theological Method: Magisterial

V. Energy

Energy, for the communitarian, is the vital force of practices and institutions sustained across generations — the energy that keeps a parish, a guild, a neighbourhood, a tradition of craft, a body of liturgy alive. MacIntyre's account in 'After Virtue' of practices as goods internal to themselves, sustained by traditions of apprenticeship and habituation, articulates this commitment. The framework's reading as relational follows: energy is constituted within the practices that channel and conserve it, not held by isolated individuals who could in principle deploy it anywhere. The communitarian therefore reads the exhaustion of practices (the decline of trades, of religious orders, of local civic life) as a real loss of energy from the social body rather than as the freeing of resources for higher uses. Renewal requires the patient rebuilding of the communities within which vital practices can be sustained.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Information, in the communitarian frame, is tradition — the inherited stock of stories, exemplars, practices, and arguments through which a community understands itself and transmits its understanding. MacIntyre's account of a tradition as 'an historically extended, socially embodied argument' and Walzer's 'Spheres of Justice' both proceed from the premise that meaningful information is constituted within particular communal frameworks. The framework's reading of information as relational follows: there is no view from nowhere from which moral and political vocabulary can be assessed, and the abstract universals of liberal theory are exposed as local traditions inflated to claimed universality. Communitarianism therefore privileges the careful exegesis of inherited resources over the abstract construction of new ones.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Non-conserved Granularity: Continuous
← #111 Cybernetics All Schools #113 Behaviorism →

Works that name Communitarianism in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

25%
The Search for Common Ground (Late)
Howard Thurman · 1971
25%
Fragments (War Elegies)
Tyrtaeus · c. 650s BCE
16%
Loaves and Fishes (Middle-to-late)
Dorothy Day · 1963
15%
Maktūbāt (Letters) (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · mid-13th century
15%
The Book of Rites (Liji) (Mid)
Anonymous (composed by various early Confucian writers) · Han dynasty compilation (c. 1st c. BCE) of pre-Qin and Han materials
15%
The Idea of a Christian Society (Mid)
Thomas Stearns Eliot · 1939
15%
Pali Canon: Vinaya Pitaka (Early)
Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) · c. 5th-1st c. BCE
15%
Thousand Points of Light (Mid)
George H. W. Bush · 1988 (August 18, 1988)
15%
Speeches in the Shangshu (Call of Shao and others)
Duke of Shao (attributed) · c. 11th century BCE (events); written form c. 10th–5th century BCE
10%
Death and the King's Horseman (Mid)
Wole Soyinka · 1975
10%
Myth, Literature and the African World (Mid)
Wole Soyinka · 1976
10%
Reflections on the Causes of Liberty and Social Oppression (Early)
Simone Weil · 1934
10%
The Book of Songs (Shijing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Confucius as editor) · c. 1000-600 BCE (poems); c. 6th-5th c. BCE (compiled)
10%
The Book of Documents (Shujing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Confucius as editor) · composed in stages c. 1100-600 BCE; compiled c. 6th-5th c. BCE; portions are later forgeries detected in Qing-period scholarship
10%
Lanquidity (Late)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · 1978 (recorded August 17, 1978; released 1978)
10%
The Magic City (Mid)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · 1965 (recorded), 1966 (released)
10%
Sun Ra Discography (Late)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · c. 1957-1993 (recordings); compiled discography in scholarship 1990s-onward
10%
Evangelii Gaudium (Late)
Pope Francis (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) · 2013 (November 24)
10%
Amoris Laetitia (Late)
Pope Francis (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) · 2016 (March 19)
10%
All About Love (Late)
bell hooks · 2000
10%
We Drink from Our Own Wells (Mid)
Gustavo Gutiérrez · 1983 (Spanish), 1984 (English)
10%
The Power of the Poor in History (Mid)
Gustavo Gutiérrez · 1979 (Spanish), 1983 (English)
10%
Dasam Granth (Mature)
Guru Gobind Singh · c. 1696-1708
10%
Sources of Strength: Meditations on Scripture for a Living Faith (Late)
James Earl Carter Jr. · 1997
10%
Doctrine and Covenants (Mid)
Joseph Smith Jr. · 1823-44 (revelations); 1835 (first ed.)
10%
The Pearl of Great Price (Mid)
Joseph Smith Jr. · c. 1830-1844 (materials); 1851 (compiled)
10%
King Follett Discourse (Late)
Joseph Smith Jr. · 1844 (April 7, 1844)
10%
Articles of Faith (Mid)
Joseph Smith Jr. · 1842 (March 1, 1842)
10%
Geneva Catechism (Mid)
John Calvin (Jean Cauvin) · 1545 (Latin), 1542 (French earlier version)
10%
Ecclesiastical Ordinances of Geneva (Mature)
John Calvin (Jean Cauvin) · 1541 (first ed.), 1561 (revised)
10%
God Is Red (Mid)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 1973 (1st ed.), 1992 (2nd ed.), 2003 (3rd ed.)
10%
Spirit and Reason (Late)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 1999
10%
Ecology, Community and Lifestyle (Late)
Arne Næss · 1989
10%
Promise Me, Dad (Late)
Joseph R. Biden Jr. · 2017
10%
Larger and Smaller Catechisms (Mature)
Martin Luther · 1529
10%
Luther German Bible (Mature)
Martin Luther · 1522 (NT), 1534 (complete Bible)
10%
Who Owns the Future? (Middle (public-philosophical career))
Jaron Lanier · 2013
5%
Oneself as Another (Late)
Paul Ricoeur · 1990 (French; English 1992)
5%
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Late)
Eleanor Roosevelt · 1947-48 (drafted), December 10, 1948 (adopted)
5%
Majālis-i Sabʿa (Seven Sermons) (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · mid-13th century
5%
The Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu) (Early)
Confucius (traditionally attributed) · 5th c. BCE (traditional); chronicling events 722-481 BCE
5%
A Dance of the Forests (Early)
Wole Soyinka · 1960
5%
The Synthesis of Yoga (Mature)
Sri Aurobindo · 1914-21 (serial), revisions through 1940s
5%
The Will to Change (Late)
bell hooks · 2004
5%
Jaap Sahib (Mature)
Guru Gobind Singh · c. 1696-1708

Personas with Communitarianism as a declared influence

20%  Tyrtaeus 10%  Duke of Shao 5%  Thiruvalluvar

How Communitarianism resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 16 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money is the ledger of obligations among real people.
On relational views, money is not a substance you have; it is a record of who owes whom what. Debts and credits are real because the relations they track are real — to kin, to community, to ancestors, to land. Money is the form this …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (55%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people.
On relational views, the nation is the relational fabric — extended kinship, ancestral inheritance, shared ecology, communal practice — that hosts a people across generations. Borders matter less than belonging; lineage and land carry the weight that political structures only ratify.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (55%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · “Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition.
On relational views, identity is not a property a person has alone; it is constituted by the web of recognition the person sits in. What makes someone a man or a woman in any thick sense is the relations of kinship, community, ritual, and recognition …
Roads not taken Sex is a real biological kind with given content. (55%) · Gender is constructed; what counts as male or female reflects practice. (16%) · “Male” and “female” are family-resemblance terms — no single essence. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
Should we edit the human germline?
Whether human nature is a given biological kind, a constructed category, a relational achievement, a family-resemblance cluster, or a conventional distinction within deeper unity is the ontological question the policy debate over heritable gene editing is mostly about.
Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric.
On relational views, what makes someone a person is the web of kinship, ancestry, and community they sit in — not a property the body carries alone. Heritable editing intervenes in exactly this fabric: the lineage that ancestors handed on, the descent that descendants will …
Roads not taken Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. (55%) · The categories we count as 'human' are emergent from practice; germline editing is a practice-revision like any other. (16%) · 'Human nature' is a cluster term without a single essence; the editing question is empirical, not metaphysical. (8%)
Distinctive · only 16% of schools agree (33/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance.
On this view, matter is not a stuff but a patterning — the standing relations among things, ancestors, processes, and places. The creatio-ex-nihilo question doesn't quite arise, because the ontology has no slot for a free-standing substance to be created or eternal. What persists is …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (10/208)
Does history have a direction or meaning?
Is history the unfolding of progress, the recovery of lost truth, a cyclical recurrence, the approach of consummation — or none of these?
The truth was once known and has been lost; the task is recovery.
History is the loss of an original integrity that must be restored.
Roads not taken History is not where the deepest truth lives. (36%) · History is the gradual unfolding of improvement or liberation. (23%) · History is oriented toward a decisive consummation. (19%)
Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (21/208)
Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed?
What kind of thing is a true claim, and how does it relate to the standpoint from which it is made?
Truth is real but accessible only from within a tradition.
Truth is not constructed but tradition-constituted; you have to be inside the tradition to see it.
Roads not taken Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. (66%) · Truth is real but always known from a perspective. (16%) · What counts as truth is constituted by language, practice, history, power. (8%)
Distinctive · only 13% of schools agree (28/208)
What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize?
Religious traditions differ not only in what they believe, but in how authority is structured — and what counts as the right kind of argument.
Institutional teaching tradition is the authority.
Scripture, tradition, and the institutional magisterium together carry revealed truth.
Roads not taken The category does not apply — the school is non-religious. (42%) · Direct experiential union is the authority. (16%) · Historical-critical method is the authority. (10%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation.
On relational views, person was never the name of a thing that exists on its own — it is the name of a node in a web of recognition, obligation, kinship, and ecology. The question of when a being becomes a person is the question …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (55%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · The question presupposes a fact of the matter that isn’t there. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates.
On relational views, marriage is not a thing in itself but a node in a web — a configuration of obligations to children, extended kin, ancestors, ecology, and community. Its definition is what the network of relations is, and any attempt to specify it apart …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (55%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Marriage” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
32 mainstream positions
What is our place in nature? Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world. 14% Should we colonize space? Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking. 14% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Editing the genome cuts into the relational fabric; we should be very slow. 14% What happens to "you" when you die? You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. 18% Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Moral obligation tracks the relations one is in; distance does matter, structurally. 50% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer changes the pray-er, not the prayed-for. 47% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Coincidence is exactly what the math says it is. The pattern is in the noticer. 47% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The observer is in time; foreknowledge across times raises real freedom problems. 46% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditators are bounded observers reporting unusual brain states; the 'timeless' is metaphorical. 46% Does prayer change God's mind? If there is an addressee at all, it is in time; prayer is communication, and may genuinely change what comes next. 46% Are the dead morally present to the living? Observers are bounded by their own moment, and no further agency makes the dead present. 43% What makes someone the same person over time? You are your body — continuity is bodily continuity. 36% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? Same body, same person — even when the cognitive pattern has changed. 36% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? Different body, different person — you died in the scanner. 36% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous fields, classical limits, analog deep structure. 36% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous Jamesian stream, phenomenological lived time. 36% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Reconstructed — continuous re-narrating, no fixed engrams. 36% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 30% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 30% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 30% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% Could an AI have a mind that matters? An AI’s standing is constituted by the relations it enters. 14% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? The community is saved together or not at all. 14% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? An animal's standing is constituted by its place in the relational fabric. 11% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? The organoid's standing is constituted by the relations of care around its production. 11% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through practical engagement; what works counts as known. 9%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208