School #29

Buddhism

Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha)

Buddhism, founded on the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha, c. 5th century BCE), holds that all conditioned phenomena are marked by three characteristics: impermanence (anicca), suffering (dukkha), and the absence of a permanent self (anatta). The core teachings are preserved in the Pali Canon (Tipitaka), particularly the 'Dhammapada' and the suttas of the 'Sutta Pitaka', which record the Buddha's discourses on dependent origination (paticca samuppada) — the principle that everything arises in dependence on conditions, and nothing possesses independent, self-sustaining existence. Nagarjuna's 'Mulamadhyamakakarika' ('Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way', c. 2nd century CE) radicalized this into the doctrine of sunyata (emptiness): not only selves but all things whatsoever, including the dharmas (basic elements of experience) themselves, are empty of intrinsic nature. Liberation (nirvana) is not an escape to another realm but the cessation of craving and the direct recognition of reality as it already is — interdependent, impermanent, and selfless. The framework reads this entry as the broad mainstream of Buddhist thought — Theravada and most Mahayana (including Zen / Chan, Madhyamaka, and the early Buddha-Dharma) — anchored in anatta, dependent origination, and contemplative practice as the path. Two Buddhist traditions appear in the framework as separate entries because they depart from this anchor in load-bearing ways: Pure Land Buddhism centers on other-power salvation through Amida Buddha's primal vow (treating Amida as a personal saving agent), and Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism develops a rich tantric metaphysics with deity-yoga, the Adi-Buddha as primordial ground, and the mindstream as trans-temporal substrate. Where this entry says "Buddhism" without qualification, read it as the contemplative, non-personal-deity, non-tantric mainstream; the other two entries flesh out what the framework cannot capture from this core alone.

Worldview

The Buddhist experiences reality as a ceaselessly flowing stream of interdependent, impermanent processes in which nothing — not the self, not the world, not even the present moment — possesses a fixed, enduring essence. To hold this ontology is to live with a radical openness: every form is arising and passing, every identity is provisional, and clinging to any of it is the root of suffering. The fundamental orientation is one of compassionate detachment, a willingness to engage fully with the world while recognizing that all phenomena are empty of intrinsic existence. Living inside this worldview feels like standing in a river — the water is real, vivid, and constantly moving, but there is nothing permanent to grasp. Liberation is not an escape from this flow but the clear-eyed recognition that there was never a separate self to be threatened by impermanence in the first place. The framework classifies this as None: although buddhas, bodhisattvas, and devas populate the cosmos, the framework here reads Buddhism's core ontology as recognizing no creator god or cosmic ordering principle; liberation runs through dependent origination, not divine agency. The framework reads this as Experience-grounded moral authority: the Buddha-Dharma is finally authenticated by direct insight (vipassanā, prajñā) — the suttas urge ehipassiko, 'come and see,' and the Kālāma Sutta makes one's own examined experience the test, with text and sangha as supports toward that verification.

Moral Implications

Buddhist ethics is rooted in the recognition that all sentient beings share the condition of suffering (dukkha) and the capacity for liberation. The Eightfold Path provides a comprehensive ethical framework: right speech, right action, and right livelihood are not arbitrary commands but practical expressions of the insight that harmful actions arise from ignorance and craving, while beneficial actions arise from wisdom and compassion. Karma is understood as the natural law of moral causation: every intentional action shapes the conditions of future experience. Because there is no fixed self, compassion extends naturally to all beings — the boundary between self-interest and altruism dissolves. The bodhisattva ideal in Mahayana Buddhism elevates universal compassion to the highest ethical principle, deferring one's own final liberation until all sentient beings are freed from suffering.

Practical Implications

Buddhism encourages a way of life centered on mindfulness, simplicity, and the reduction of craving — principles with direct consequences for consumption, environmental stewardship, and social organization. The doctrine of interdependence (pratityasamutpada) provides a natural philosophical foundation for ecological thinking: harming any part of the web of life is understood as harming the whole. Technology is neither rejected nor embraced uncritically but evaluated by whether it increases or decreases suffering and delusion. In governance and economics, Buddhist principles support equitable distribution, non-violence, and the cultivation of contentment over endless growth. Daily practice — meditation, ethical conduct, and the cultivation of awareness — is understood not as a retreat from the world but as the most direct way to transform it from within.

I. Time

Time is emergent and infinite — it is not a substance but a conceptual designation applied to the arising and ceasing of dependently originated phenomena. Cyclical time (samsara) extends without beginning through endless rounds of birth, death, and rebirth. Time is continuous and uni-directional in ordinary experience, but liberation (nirvana) is the cessation of conditioned temporal becoming.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Discrete Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Cyclical Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is emergent and infinite — it is one of the six elements (dhatus) but has no inherent, independent existence. It is merely the absence of obstruction. Space is undefined in curvature because Buddhism does not attribute fixed geometric properties to it. Locality is local: beings are situated in particular spatial contexts, though advanced meditative states may transcend ordinary spatial perception.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Undefined Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter is emergent — it is rupa (form/materiality), one of the five aggregates (skandhas), arising through dependent origination. Matter is impermanent (anicca) and without self-nature (anatta). It is conserved at the conventional level in the sense that material elements reconfigure but do not vanish, yet ultimately, matter, like all conditioned phenomena, is empty (sunyata) of inherent existence.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Non-conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

The observer is an embodied being situated in the present moment — but this "self" is not what it appears to be. What we call the observer is a constantly changing stream of aggregates (skandhas) with no permanent essence, no fixed identity persisting through time. Knowledge is immediate: direct mindful awareness of the present is the path to insight, not abstract theorizing. Yet retention is also immediate — clinging to past knowledge is itself a form of attachment, and the Buddhist practitioner learns to hold knowledge lightly. The observer is active in the sense that disciplined practice (meditation, ethical conduct, right understanding) is required to see through the illusion of a permanent self. Multiple observers share the world of suffering and impermanence, each on their own path toward liberation.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Total Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: None Moral Authority: Experience Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Finite and emerging — vital and mental energies are dependently arisen and impermanent. Conservation: Non-conserved — energies arise and pass away; in liberation, the cycle of arising ceases entirely. Usage: Once — each moment of conscious energy is unique and unrepeatable; clinging to it perpetuates suffering.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Non-conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Information is dependently originated — no informational unit has inherent existence. All information arises through relations and conditions, and passes away when those conditions change. The framework places this as non-conserved at both scales: at the cosmic scale information is dependently originated and impermanent, and at the personal-identity scale there is no atman or persisting self — the aggregates dissolve at death with no soul to be conserved (anatta).

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Non-conserved Personal Conservation: Non-conserved Granularity: Continuous

Experiments This School Responds To (8)

The Ship of Theseus
c. 75 AD · Reframes the question
Anatta and impermanence dissolve the question: neither A nor B is *the* ship because there was no enduring self-natured ship to begin with — only …
Parfit's Teletransporter
1984 · Affirms / takes the bait
A natural fit for anatta: there is no persistent self to be teleported in the first place. The case reproduces, in a science-fictional register, what …
Dennett's 'Where Am I?'
1978 · Affirms / takes the bait
The case nicely confirms anatta: the "self" is a fiction projected onto changing aggregates, with no fact of the matter about its location.
Eternal Recurrence
1882 · Reframes the question
The thought of recurrence echoes saṃsāra — but the appropriate response is liberation from the cycle, not its affirmation. Nietzsche's amor fati and Buddhist nirvana …
Reid's Brave Officer
1785 · Reframes the question
Anatta: there is no persistent self, only aggregates and conventional designations. Reid's case exposes the Lockean inheritance of substance-thinking even in Locke's nominal opposition to …
Locke's Prince and the Cobbler
1694 · Reframes the question
There is no persistent prince or cobbler to begin with; the case proves only that conventional identity follows the conventionally-recognised continuant, whichever that is.
Williams' Self and the Future
1970 · Affirms / takes the bait
There is no person to swap; the cases show only that conventional designations track different streams in different framings. Anatta dissolves the puzzle.
The Cogito
1637 / 1641 · Denies / rejects the premise
The Cogito reifies the thinker; anatta denies that any persistent self underlies the thinking. The Cartesian inference is reified grammar.

Films Reading Through This School (8)

Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring
2003 · dir. Kim Ki-duk · 30%
The film is structured by core Buddhist commitments: karma as the lawful consequence of intention, dukkha as the texture of attachment, the cycle of becoming …
The Fountain
2006 · dir. Darren Aronofsky · 25%
The film's ethical centre is Buddhist: attachment is the source of suffering, and liberation is releasing the demand that one's beloved persist. Izzi is the …
Ghost in the Shell
1995 · dir. Mamoru Oshii · 20%
Oshii layers a Buddhist reading over the cyberpunk frame: identity is not substantial, attachment to the current shell is unwarranted, and the proposed merger is …
Tokyo Story
1953 · dir. Yasujirō Ozu · 20%
The film carries a Buddhist register beneath its confucian frame: impermanence as the condition of every relation, attachment as the predictable form of suffering, equanimity …
Yi Yi (A One and a Two)
2000 · dir. Edward Yang · 20%
A Buddhist register runs beneath the confucian frame: the grandmother's death is staged as the impermanence around which everyone is already living, and Yang-Yang's closing …
Memento
2000 · dir. Christopher Nolan · 15%
A Buddhist reading is available: Leonard exposes the doctrine of anatta (no-self) by being a person made of moments without the illusion of substantial continuity. …
Enter the Void
2009 · dir. Gaspar Noé · 15%
Beyond its Vajrayana specifics, the film is committed to broader Buddhist claims: attachment binds the disembodied awareness as thoroughly as it binds the embodied one, …
Mr. Nobody
2009 · dir. Jaco Van Dormael · 10%
Buddhist-adjacent: the dissolution of a single continuous self into a multiplicity is congenial to anatta, though the film's tone (regret, tenderness, longing) is not.

Debates Where This School Is Allied (1)

← #28 Solipsism All Schools #30 Kantian Transcendental Idealism →

Works that name Buddhism in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

70%
The Dhammapada
Anonymous (attributed to the Buddha, compiled by the early sangha) · c. 3rd century BC (Pali recension; verses likely older)
70%
Visuddhimagga
Buddhaghosa · c. 430 AD (composed at the Mahāvihāra monastery, Anurādhapura, Sri Lanka)
50%
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
Nāgārjuna · c. 150–250 AD (South India)
50%
Abhidharmakośa
Vasubandhu · c. 4th–5th century AD
45%
The Heart Sutra
Anonymous (Mahāyāna tradition; some scholars argue for a Chinese composition c. 7th century) · c. 600 AD (extant form); verses possibly earlier
45%
Rock Edicts
Ashoka (Devānampiya Piyadassi) · c. 257–240 BCE
40%
The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch
Hui-neng (638–713), as transmitted by Fa-hai · c. 780 AD (Dunhuang manuscript); refined recensions through 13th century
40%
Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism (Early (Suzuki's first major book; preceding the Essays in Zen Buddhism by twenty years))
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1907 (Suzuki's first major book in English, written during his work with Paul Carus at the Open Court Press)
35%
Essays in Zen Buddhism (Mid (Suzuki's major early period of Western dissemination))
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1927 (First Series), 1933 (Second), 1934 (Third) — published in English by Rider & Co. London
30%
Zen and Japanese Culture (Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1959 (developed from his 1938 Zen Buddhism and Its Influence on Japanese Culture)
30%
Shōbōgenzō (Late)
Dōgen Zenji · 1231-1253 (95 fascicles)
30%
Wild Ivy (Itsumadegusa) (Late)
Hakuin Ekaku · 1765-66
30%
Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind (Late)
Shunryu Suzuki (Suzuki-rōshi) · 1970
30%
Being Peace (Late)
Thich Nhat Hanh · 1987
30%
The Logic of the Place of Nothingness and the Religious Worldview (Late (Nishida's final completed essay, written months before his death))
Nishida Kitarō · 1945 (composed Feb-April 1945; published posthumously)
30%
Pali Canon: Sutta Pitaka (Early)
Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) · c. 5th-1st c. BCE (compiled c. 1st c. BCE)
30%
Pali Canon: Vinaya Pitaka (Early)
Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) · c. 5th-1st c. BCE
30%
Vigrahavyāvartanī (Early)
Nāgārjuna · c. 150-250 AD
30%
Śūnyatāsaptati (Mid)
Nāgārjuna · c. 150-250 AD
30%
Yuktiṣaṣṭikā (Mid)
Nāgārjuna · c. 150-250 AD
30%
Pramanavarttika (Commentary on Valid Cognition) (Early)
Dharmakirti · c. 7th century
28%
From the Acting to the Seeing (Middle-to-late)
Nishida Kitarō · 1927
28%
The Self-Identity of Absolute Contradiction (Late)
Nishida Kitarō · 1939
26%
Intuition and Reflection in Self-Consciousness (Middle)
Nishida Kitarō · 1917
25%
Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist (Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1957
25%
Mystics and Zen Masters (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1967
25%
Mahāyānasaṃgraha (Mid)
Asaṅga · c. 4th-5th century CE
25%
Attaining Enlightenment in This Very Existence (Sokushin Jōbutsu Gi) (Early)
Kūkai (Kōbō Daishi) · c. 817
25%
Lam rim chen mo (The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment) (Mid)
Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa · 1402
25%
Religion and Nothingness (Shūkyō to wa nani ka) (Mid)
Nishitani Keiji · 1961
25%
Full Catastrophe Living (Late)
Jon Kabat-Zinn · 1990 (revised 2013)
25%
The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Mid)
Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa · 1402 (Tibetan)
25%
Ocean of Reasoning (Mature (Tsongkhapa's major philosophical-Madhyamaka work))
Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa · c. 1407
25%
The Sea of Fertility (Last)
Yukio Mishima · 1965-71 (four-volume tetralogy)
25%
An Introduction to Zen Buddhism (Mid)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1934 (Japanese-published English ed.); 1949 (Rider ed. with Jung foreword)
25%
Freedom in Exile (Mid)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1990
25%
The Art of Happiness (Late)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1998
25%
The Temple of Dawn (Late)
Yukio Mishima · 1968-70 (serial), 1970 (book)
25%
Pali Canon: Abhidhamma Pitaka (Early-Mid)
Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) · c. 3rd c. BCE-1st c. BCE (compiled later than other baskets)
25%
Dhammapada (Early)
Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) · c. 3rd c. BCE (compiled)
25%
The Lankavatara Sutra (Mid)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1932
25%
The Field of Zen (Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1969 (posthumous)
25%
Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism (Early)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1907
25%
Zen and Japanese Culture (Mid-Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1938 (Zen Buddhism and Its Influence on Japanese Culture); 1959 (revised Zen and Japanese Culture)
25%
Ratnāvalī (Mid-to-late)
Nāgārjuna · c. 150-250 AD
24%
In Praise of Dependent Origination (Early-mature)
Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa · c. 1397-1400 (early-mature)
22%
Viṃśatikā (Mature (post-conversion to Mahāyāna))
Vasubandhu · c. 4th-5th century
22%
Triṃśikā (Mature)
Vasubandhu · c. 4th-5th century
22%
Essence of Eloquence on the Interpretable and Definitive Meanings (Late-mature)
Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa · 1407-1408
20%
The World as Will and Representation
Arthur Schopenhauer · 1818 (first ed.); 1844 (expanded with second volume); 1859 (final third edition)
20%
Island (Late)
Aldous Huxley · 1962
20%
An Inquiry into the Good (Zen no Kenkyū) (Early)
Nishida Kitarō · 1911
20%
The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality (Late)
Tenzin Gyatso (14th Dalai Lama) · 2005
20%
Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism (Mid)
Chögyam Trungpa · 1973 (compiled from 1970-71 lectures)
20%
When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times (Late)
Pema Chödrön (Deirdre Blomfield-Brown) · 1997
20%
Kyōgyōshinshō (Mature)
Shinran · c. 1224; revised through c. 1247
20%
Eyeless in Gaza (Mid-mature)
Aldous Huxley · 1936
20%
Ethics for the New Millennium (Late)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1999
20%
My Land and My People (Early)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1962
20%
The Decay of the Angel (Late)
Yukio Mishima · 1970 (completed Nov 25, 1970); 1971 (posthumous publication)
20%
Zen and the Birds of Appetite (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1968
20%
Attaining Enlightenment in This Very Existence
Kukai (Kobo Daishi) · c. 817 CE
20%
Treatise on the Golden Lion
Fazang · c. 699 CE (lecture to Empress Wu Zetian)
20%
Great Calming and Contemplation
Zhiyi · 594 CE (lectures recorded by Guanding)
20%
Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch (Liuzu Tanjing) (Early)
Huineng (attributed; compiled by disciples) · c. 780 (earliest Dunhuang manuscript; text attributed to Huineng, d. 713)
15%
Yoga Sutras
Patañjali (the historical author or compiler; possibly composite) · c. 2nd century BC – 4th century AD (composite redaction likely)
15%
Zhuangzi
Zhuangzi (Zhuang Zhou) · c. 4th-3rd c. BC (Inner Chapters by Zhuang Zhou; Outer and Miscellaneous Chapters by later hands)
15%
The Perennial Philosophy (Late (Huxley's mature spiritual-philosophical synthesis))
Aldous Huxley · 1945
15%
Seeds of Contemplation (1949) / New Seeds of Contemplation (Mid-late (Merton's mature contemplative theology))
Thomas Merton · 1961 (expanded revision of Seeds of Contemplation, 1949)
15%
Parerga and Paralipomena (Late)
Arthur Schopenhauer · 1851
15%
The Sea of Fertility (Late (the major late work, completed the day of his 1970 ritual suicide))
Yukio Mishima · 1965-70 (Spring Snow 1965-67, Runaway Horses 1967-68, The Temple of Dawn 1968-70, The Decay of the Angel 1970-71)
15%
Ecology, Community and Lifestyle (Late (Næss's mature statement; the systematic expansion of his 1973 "shallow vs deep ecology" essay))
Arne Næss · 1976 (Norwegian); 1989 (English)
15%
Inquiry on the Great Learning (Daxue Wen) (Late)
Wang Yangming · 1527
15%
Philosophy as Metanoetics (Zangedō to shite no tetsugaku) (Late)
Tanabe Hajime · 1946
15%
Eastern and Western Cultures and Their Philosophies (Dongxi wenhua ji qi zhexue) (Early)
Liang Shuming · 1921
15%
The First and Last Freedom (Mid)
Jiddu Krishnamurti · 1954
15%
The Power of Now (Late)
Eckhart Tolle · 1997 (Canada); 2004 (revised US)
15%
Tannishō (Posthumous (the principal popular source for Shinran's teaching))
Shinran · c. 1290 (compiled by Yuien-bō about 30 years after Shinran's death)
15%
Jōdo Wasan (Late)
Shinran · 1248 (Shinran in his mid-seventies)
15%
Spring Snow (Late)
Yukio Mishima · 1965-67 (serial), 1969 (book)
15%
From East to West (Late)
Roy Bhaskar · 2000
15%
The Voice of the Silence (Late)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1889
15%
Yuishinshō Mon'i (Mature)
Shinran · 1255
10%
The Doors of Perception (Late)
Aldous Huxley · 1954 (essay-length; often published together with the 1956 Heaven and Hell)
10%
The Seven Storey Mountain (Early (Merton's breakthrough book; the spiritual autobiography of his conversion))
Thomas Merton · 1948
10%
The Waste Land (Mid (the canonical modernist poem))
Thomas Stearns Eliot · 1921 (during Eliot's nervous breakdown and convalescence in Switzerland); 1922 published (edited substantially by Ezra Pound)
10%
Vom Abgeschiedenheit (On Detachment) / Counsels on Discernment (Early)
Meister Eckhart (Eckhart von Hochheim) · c. 1295-98 (Eckhart's early German-vernacular work, written for the religious community at Erfurt)
10%
The Temple of the Golden Pavilion (Mid)
Yukio Mishima · 1956
10%
Runaway Horses (Late)
Yukio Mishima · 1969 (the second of the four Sea of Fertility novels)
10%
Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1966
10%
The Kephalaia
Manichaean disciples / compilers, drawing on Mani's teaching (5th century CE Coptic redaction of late 3rd-century material) · Material from c. 240–280 CE; Coptic redaction c. 350–450 CE
10%
Zhuzi Yulei (Conversations of Master Zhu, Arranged Topically) (Late)
Zhu Xi (Chu Hsi); compiled by Li Jingde · Conversations 1170-1200; compiled 1270
10%
Christ in a Pluralistic Age (Mid)
John B. Cobb Jr. · 1975
10%
Reasons and Persons (Mid)
Derek Parfit · 1984
10%
Climate and Culture (Fūdo: ningengakuteki kōsatsu) (Mid)
Watsuji Tetsurō · 1935
10%
A Short History of Chinese Philosophy (Mid)
Fung Yu-lan (Feng Youlan) · 1948
10%
Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy (Zhi de zhijue yu Zhongguo zhexue) (Late)
Mou Zongsan · 1971
10%
The Importance of Living (Mid)
Lin Yutang · 1937
10%
Kokoro (Late)
Natsume Sōseki · 1914 (serialized Asahi Shimbun)
10%
The Inward Journey (Late-mature)
Howard Thurman · 1961
10%
Kōsō Wasan (Mature)
Shinran · c. 1255
5%
Walden (Mid (Thoreau's major prose statement))
Henry David Thoreau · 1854 (drawing on Thoreau's 1845-47 residence at Walden Pond)
5%
The Sovereignty of Good (Mid (her major philosophical statement, alongside Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals 1992))
Iris Murdoch · 1970 (collecting essays from 1956-67)
5%
The Great Learning and Doctrine of the Mean
Confucius (Kongzi) · Originally chapters of the Book of Rites (Li Ji, c. 1st c. BC); elevated to the Four Books by Zhu Xi (1130-1200) in the Song dynasty
5%
Brave New World (Mid (Huxley's breakthrough novel))
Aldous Huxley · 1932
5%
Sadhana: The Realisation of Life (Mid (the major philosophical prose statement))
Rabindranath Tagore · 1913 (the Hibbert Lectures, Harvard; published 1913)
5%
Modern Man in Search of a Soul (Mid-late (mature systematic statement))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1933 (essay collection, English translation by Cary F. Baynes)
5%
Four Quartets (Late (Eliot's mature Anglo-Catholic period))
Thomas Stearns Eliot · 1936 (Burnt Norton); 1940 (East Coker); 1941 (The Dry Salvages); 1942 (Little Gidding); 1943 (collected publication)
5%
The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (Late (the mature systematic statement of archetypal psychology))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1934-55 (essays composed across two decades); 1959 (compiled as Volume 9, Part 1 of the Collected Works)
5%
Memories, Dreams, Reflections (Late (the major autobiographical work))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1957-61 (recorded conversations with Aniela Jaffé); published 1962
5%
Śrī Bhāṣya (Mid)
Rāmānuja · c. 1100
5%
The Life Divine (Late)
Sri Aurobindo (Aurobindo Ghose) · 1914-19 (Arya magazine); 1939-40 (book)
5%
The Hindu View of Life (Mid)
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan · 1926 (Upton Lectures at Oxford, 1926)
5%
Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation (Late)
Tu Weiming · 1985
5%
Raja Yoga: Conquering the Internal Nature (Late)
Swami Vivekananda · 1896
5%
Autobiography of a Yogi (Late)
Paramahansa Yogananda · 1946
5%
Animal Liberation (Mid)
Peter Singer · 1975
5%
The Order of Time (Late)
Carlo Rovelli · 2017 (Italian); 2018 (English)
5%
Daodejing (Early)
Laozi (trad. attrib.) · 4th c. BCE (composite text; trad. attrib. Laozi 6th c.)
5%
The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (Late)
Haruki Murakami · 1994-95 (Japanese 3 vols.); 1997 (English single volume)
5%
Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (Late (Murdoch's longest and most ambitious philosophical book, published nine years after the Gifford Lectures))
Iris Murdoch · 1992 (Chatto & Windus, based on the 1982 Gifford Lectures at Edinburgh)
5%
The Sea, The Sea (Late-mature)
Iris Murdoch · 1978 (Chatto & Windus); Booker Prize 1978
5%
The Secret Doctrine (Mature)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1888
5%
Instructions for Practical Living
Wang Yangming (Wang Shouren) · c. 1518 (compiled by students; expanded editions to 1572)

Personas with Buddhism as a declared influence

70%  Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) 40%  Ashoka 35%  Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki 35%  Nāgārjuna 30%  Dharmakirti 25%  Thomas Merton 25%  Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama 25%  Arthur Schopenhauer 25%  Vasubandhu 25%  Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa 25%  Nishida Kitarō 20%  Shinran 20%  Yuval Noah Harari 20%  bell hooks 20%  Kukai (Kobo Daishi) 20%  Fazang 20%  Zhiyi 20%  Huineng 15%  Martin Luther King Jr. 15%  Henry David Thoreau 15%  Aldous Huxley 15%  Mani 15%  Derek Parfit 15%  Wang Yangming 10%  Thomas Stearns Eliot 10%  Yukio Mishima 10%  Zhuangzi (Zhuang Zhou) 10%  Peter Singer 10%  Patanjali 5%  Laozi (Lao Tzu) 5%  Arne Næss -10%  Īśvarakṛṣṇa

How Buddhism resolves each dilemma

56 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 36 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 1 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
How much weight do future people deserve?
If a billion people will exist in the 25th century, do their interests count for as much as the interests of a billion people alive now? The answer turns on what kind of reality the future has.
Past, present, and future are bound in cycles — duties span generations as a matter of course.
On these views, time is not a one-way arrow but a structure of return: cosmic cycles, karmic cycles, the seasons, the succession of generations. To act now is always also to act for the ancestors who shaped your inheritance and for the descendants who will …
Roads not taken Future people are as real as you are — and their interests count for as much. (47%) · Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. (31%) · The future branches — what we owe depends on which branch we create. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Is regret rational?
If the past is fixed and unchangeable, what kind of mental act is regret? An error, a duty, a lesson, a perspective on a moment that is still in some sense present?
The past is part of a cycle one keeps returning to; regret is one of the gates of the cycle.
On cyclical views, the past is not a fixed thing behind you — it is part of the ongoing structure of return: karmic cycles, cosmic cycles, the cycle of seasons and generations. Regret, on these views, is less about an unchangeable past and more about …
Roads not taken The past is as real as the present; regret is a real attitude toward a real thing. (47%) · The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. (31%) · Other branches exist; regret tracks roads not taken that are nonetheless real. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them?
A species that no longer exists cannot be helped, cannot be consulted, cannot benefit. Whether anything is owed to it anyway turns on what kind of reality past beings have.
Past beings are part of the cycle; we owe them what we owe ancestors.
On cyclical views, the relationship to past beings — ancestors, lineages, predecessors — is structurally present, because past and future are part of the same ongoing structure of return. Extinct species are not categorically different from extinct human ancestors or non-yet-born descendants: all are part …
Roads not taken Extinct species are as real as we are; they have standing. (47%) · Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. (31%) · Extinction is path-dependent; the species exists in branches we didn't take. (2%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal.
On cyclical views, matter is neither a substance called out of nothing once-for-all nor a permanently conserved bedrock. It emerges from a deeper reality in each cosmic round and dissolves back into it. The creatio-ex-nihilo question presupposes a linear creation event the view denies; the …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%)
Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Is the physical world fully real?
Realists, idealists, and relationalists divide on whether matter exists mind-independently, derivatively, or as a pattern of relations. The split runs deeper than any single scientific question.
Real for this cycle — the deepest reality cycles through creation and dissolution.
On cyclical views, the physical world is real now, in this cosmic round. Its reality is not eternal; matter emerges from a deeper source and will return to it. The realism-idealism dispute, framed as a once-for-all metaphysical question, is answered at the cosmic-round scale rather …
Roads not taken Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. (56%) · Real but sustained — not mind-independent in the strict realist sense. (23%) · Real as relations — neither pure substance nor pure construction. (16%)
Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Does matter have intrinsic moral standing?
Do rocks, soil, rivers, and stuff in general deserve moral consideration — or only the living, the conscious, the human? The answer turns on what matter is.
Matter is in flux; standing is impermanent and ritual-mediated.
On cyclical views, the moral standing of a particular material form is real but impermanent. What matters is the ritual and contemplative relation to a world that is arising and dissolving. Asking for the standing of matter as such fixes what the view holds to …
Roads not taken Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. (56%) · Matter is morally considerable derivatively — through what it sustains. (23%) · Matter has intrinsic moral standing as part of the relational fabric. (16%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/208)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
“Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal.
On this view, gold, fiat currency, cryptocurrency, frequent-flyer miles, prison cigarettes, and the IOUs scribbled on a bar napkin are not all the same kind of thing. They share family resemblances but no common essence. Trying to define money univocally is asking a question that …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (55%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Money is the ledger of obligations among real people. (14%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/208)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
“Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together.
On this view, what we call nations are large-scale imagined communities — necessarily imagined because their members will never meet most other members, necessarily imagined as bounded and sovereign. The imagination is real and consequential; the underlying kind is not.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (55%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people. (14%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (10/208)
What happens to "you" when you die?
Whether anything of you persists — and in what sense — depends on what you take a person to be.
The question presupposes a "you" that never was.
Selfhood was always a useful construction stitched together from experiences, narratives, and habits. "What happens to you?" mis-poses the issue: there was no unified thing to either survive or perish.
Roads not taken A soul continues into another mode of being. (38%) · Death is genuinely the end. (29%) · You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. (18%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/208)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
The question presupposes a fact of the matter that isn’t there.
There is no point at which an unchanging core "comes into being"; there is a stream of conditioned arising that we choose to mark, or not mark, at various places. The political and moral question of how to treat developing humans is real; the metaphysical …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (55%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation. (14%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/208)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
“Marriage” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal.
On these views, “marriage” is a name applied to many overlapping but distinct social configurations across cultures and across history. To ask “what is marriage, really?” is to ask a question that doesn’t have a single answer — because there isn’t a single thing whose …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (55%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates. (14%)
Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (26/208)
Are the dead morally present to the living?
Ancestor veneration, intercession with saints, the moral weight of a promise made to someone now gone — these all presuppose that the dead are present in some sense beyond memory. Whether they are turns on whether an observer is the kind of thing that exists in a single moment or across many.
Observers span moments; the dead are present in a real (not merely metaphorical) way.
On this view, an observer is not located at a single moment but extends across moments. The dead, on this signature, are not gone — they are elsewhere on the same trans-temporal structure that you yourself occupy. Ancestor veneration, intercession with saints, the moral weight …
Roads not taken Observers are bounded by their own moment, and no further agency makes the dead present. (43%) · The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. (37%) · From the standpoint of the One, the distinction between living and dead is conventional. (8%)
Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (26/208)
Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom?
If God knows what you will do tomorrow, does your tomorrow-self choose freely? The classical problem of foreknowledge turns on whether the divine vantage stands outside time or inside it.
An observer can occupy multiple times at once; foreknowledge is not foreordering.
On this view, observers can in principle exist in more than one moment simultaneously — and divine omniscience is exactly the case of an observer occupying all moments at once. The future actions God 'foresees' aren't foreseen at all in the temporal sense; God simply …
Roads not taken The observer is in time; foreknowledge across times raises real freedom problems. (46%) · The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. (34%) · Distinction of the One and observed time is itself conventional; the question dissolves. (8%)
31 mainstream positions
Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation accesses a trans-temporal level the ordinary observer doesn't ordinarily reach. 12% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer participates in a trans-temporal liturgy or communion; the question of 'changing the mind' misses the trans-temporal mode. 12% What makes someone the same person over time? There was never a fixed self to either preserve or lose. 14% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? There was no fixed person to lose; care is owed to whoever is here. 14% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? There was no fixed you to either survive or fail to; the question is malformed. 14% What is our place in nature? Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. 15% Should we colonize space? The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. 15% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? What counts as a 'natural' genome is itself a construction. 15% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is real but always known from a perspective. 16% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% Does history have a direction or meaning? History recurs in cosmic cycles. 17% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. 18% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. 18% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. 18% Could causation work backwards? Time is structured as return; 'forward' and 'backward' are local features of the cycle. 18% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? Memory and anticipation are phases of a cycle that visits both directions. 18% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? Within a cycle there is a direction; across the cycle there isn't. 18% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Moral obligation tracks the relations one is in; distance does matter, structurally. 50% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer changes the pray-er, not the prayed-for. 47% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Coincidence is exactly what the math says it is. The pattern is in the noticer. 47% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The discrete person is the moral primary. 38% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous fields, classical limits, analog deep structure. 36% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous Jamesian stream, phenomenological lived time. 36% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Reconstructed — continuous re-narrating, no fixed engrams. 36% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. 17% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. 17% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no first-person experience, so no knowing in the relevant sense. 17% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through historical-critical engagement and the working-out of contradictions. 12% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Talk of 'standing' presupposes fixed selves that animals (and we) don't have. 10% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Asking whether the organoid is 'really' conscious presupposes a category we don't have. 10% Could an AI have a mind that matters? The question presupposes a kind of mind that never existed in the first place. 7%
1 unaligned

Information · 4 dilemmas · 4 distinctive

Pattern, memory, and what is preserved or lost.

Distinctive · only 1% of schools agree (3/208)
Is anything truly lost when someone forgets?
The memory you don't retrieve, the conversation you can't remember, the face you no longer recognise — is the forgetting a loss of something real, or just the routine operation of a finite mind?
Forgetting is the cosmic case, not the exception; nothing is conserved.
On this view, neither information nor energy is fundamentally conserved. What looks like persistence is the slow rate of certain changes; what looks like forgetting is the same kind of process running at a faster rate. The loss is real everywhere; the question is just …
Roads not taken Information is lost when a mind forgets; matter and energy continue, but the pattern is gone. (50%) · Information is conserved — the personal pattern is held even when an individual mind loses it. (39%) · Information persists or doesn't depending on whether the holder is sustained. (9%)
Distinctive · only 1% of schools agree (3/208)
Does deleting your data online destroy something real?
Account deletion, the right to be forgotten, the obsolescence of file formats, the slow decay of digital archives — whether any of this destroys something that was real depends on whether information is the kind of thing that can be destroyed.
Nothing is fundamentally conserved; deletion is just routine impermanence.
On this view, neither information nor the substrate that hosts it is fundamentally conserved. Deletion is no different from the ordinary process by which everything decays. Whether to mourn it depends on whether to mourn the more general impermanence.
Roads not taken Information is genuinely lost when the substrate that hosted it goes; deletion really destroys. (50%) · Information at the cosmic level isn't destroyed; deletion only obscures access. (39%) · Information persists where it is held; deletion releases what isn't held elsewhere. (9%)
Distinctive · only 1% of schools agree (3/208)
Could the dead, in principle, be brought back?
If we had perfect information about who someone was — their connectome, their behavioral patterns, their history — could we, in principle, restore them? The question is partly engineering, but the ceiling on the engineering is metaphysical.
Nothing of what was can be restored; restoration is wishful framing.
On this view, neither the information nor the conditions that hosted it persist past the dissolution. Talk of restoration mistakes the continuity of names or roles for the continuity of the underlying being. The person is gone; any 'restoration' is a separate being whose relationship …
Roads not taken The information dissipates with the substrate; restoration is in principle impossible. (50%) · The information that constitutes a person is conserved; restoration is in principle possible. (39%) · What is held by God or sustaining practice can be restored; what isn't can't. (9%)
Distinctive · only 1% of schools agree (3/208)
Is forgiveness ontologically possible?
When someone forgives, does the offense actually go away — erased, undone, no longer a fact — or does forgiveness reframe a wrong that persists exactly as it always was?
Nothing is preserved; the offense is impermanent, and holding it is the suffering.
On this view, neither moral facts nor the substrate that hosts them are fundamentally conserved. The offense, like everything, is impermanent. Forgiveness, where it makes sense at all, is recognising that holding the offense is the suffering — not the offense itself. The release is …
Roads not taken The offense is locally constituted by its substrate; when the substrate dissolves, the offense genuinely passes away. (50%) · The offense persists ontologically; forgiveness is real moral work, but it doesn't erase what was. (39%) · The offense persists where sustained and releases where conditionally absolved; forgiveness is real ontological work. (9%)
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208