Work #1591 · Posthumous period

Essays on Philosophical Subjects

Smith's 1795 posthumous essays — history of astronomy, ancient physics, ancient logic and metaphysics

Adam Smith · c. 1750s-1770s composition; 1795 posthumous publication · English · Posthumous philosophical essay collection

Tradition: Scottish Enlightenment / philosophy of science / history of philosophy

Smith's 1795 posthumous essays — including the early History of Astronomy, a major philosophy-of-science work

Published posthumously in 1795 by Smith's literary executors Joseph Black (the Edinburgh chemist) and James Hutton (the Edinburgh geologist) — Smith had specifically requested in his will that these manuscripts be saved from the general burning of his papers he had ordered shortly before his July 1790 death — 'Essays on Philosophical Subjects' contains seven essays that Smith had been working on across his career but had not published in his lifetime. The volume includes: (1) 'The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries, Illustrated by the History of Astronomy' — the long centrepiece essay (composed in the 1750s) treating scientific theory-change from Eudoxus and the early Greeks through Ptolemy, Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Descartes, and Newton; Smith's distinctive thesis is that scientific theories are evaluated by their imaginative-aesthetic capacity to produce wonder, surprise, and admiration in the philosophical mind, then to dissolve these emotions into intellectual satisfaction. This is one of the most influential early-modern philosophy-of-science statements. (2) 'The History of Ancient Physics' and (3) 'The History of Ancient Logic and Metaphysics' — shorter companion essays on Greek natural philosophy. (4) 'Of the External Senses' — Smith's epistemological essay on perception and sensation. (5) 'Of the Imitative Arts' — Smith's aesthetic essay on the visual arts, music, and poetry. (6) 'Of the Affinity Between Music, Dancing, and Poetry' — companion to the previous. (7) 'Of the Affinity Between Certain English and Italian Verses' — short prosodic note. The essays are the principal Smith material outside Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), Wealth of Nations (1776), and the Lectures on Jurisprudence and Rhetoric (student-note reconstructions). The History of Astronomy in particular has been continuously read since 1795 as one of the major early-modern philosophy-of-science statements.

Author

Editions cited

  • Essays on Philosophical Subjects (William Creech, Edinburgh, 1795; T. Cadell, London, 1795)
  • Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, ed. W. P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce, Essays on Philosophical Subjects (Oxford University Press / Liberty Fund, 1980)
  • Critical context: Charles L. Griswold Jr., Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1999); Ryan Hanley, Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue (Cambridge, 2009)

School Embodiments

Empiricism · 22%
Philosophy of Science · 24%
Historicism · 16%
Naturalism · 12%
Aestheticism · 12%
Classical Political Economy · 8%

Major Scottish-Enlightenment essay collection.

"The History of Astronomy illustrates the principles which guide philosophical inquiry." (Essays on Philosophical Subjects, opening of the long essay)

Major early-modern philosophy-of-science treatise.

"Wonder, surprise, and admiration drive philosophical inquiry." (History of Astronomy, in Essays on Philosophical Subjects, §I)

Strong historicist approach to scientific theory-change.

"From Eudoxus to Newton, scientific systems succeed one another by imaginative-aesthetic appeal." (History of Astronomy, §IV)

Naturalistic-empirical methodology.

"Philosophy and natural science proceed by the same imaginative-empirical method." (Essays on Philosophical Subjects)

Aesthetic theory of scientific theory-change.

"The most beautiful theory will win." (History of Astronomy, on theory-change)

Classical political-economic tradition.

Internal Tensions

Smith's most important non-economic / non-ethical philosophical work, including the early History of Astronomy. The History of Astronomy has been continuously cited in philosophy of science as a major early-modern statement; the imaginative-aesthetic theory of scientific theory-change anticipates aspects of later philosophy of science (especially Kuhn's gestalt-shift account in Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962).

I. Time

Composed across 1750s-1780s; 1795 posthumous publication.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One

II. Space

Edinburgh (Smith's final residence — he had returned from his Glasgow professorship to Edinburgh in 1778 as Commissioner of Customs).

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Posthumous essay collection (~400 pages in the Glasgow Edition). Form is varied: long historical-philosophical essay (Astronomy), shorter companion essays, brief notes.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Posthumous Smith. The observer-philosopher is the author who had ordered most of his manuscripts burned but specifically requested these saved.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Immediate Knowledge Retainment: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Impersonal

V. Energy

Posthumous-synthetic energies. The essays gather material Smith had been working on for decades but had not published.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Single posthumous volume. The History of Astronomy is the most-cited single essay.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Personas that cite this work

Adam Smith David Hume

Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint

Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.

Computed school proximity

The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.

How Essays on Philosophical Subjects resolves each dilemma

34 resolved positions across 4 dimensions · 23 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream
Observer · 37 dilemmas, all mainstream
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise whose conclusions a competent mind can in principle reproduce. 32% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is evaluable by reason — and not above it. 32% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM can produce correct outputs but not reason to them; useful, not knowing. 32% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Are the dead morally present to the living? Are there indivisible units of experience? Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Could an AI have a mind that matters? Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Does history have a direction or meaning? Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Does prayer change God's mind? How is knowledge of reality produced? If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? Is memory stored or reconstructed? Is reality fundamentally digital? Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? What happens to "you" when you die? What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? What makes someone the same person over time? Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species?
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
← #1590 Lectures on Jurisprudence All Works #1592 The Aims of the Philosophers →