Persona #191

Brigham Young

1801–1877 · American religious leader; second president of the LDS Church (1847–1877); founder of Salt Lake City

The Lion of the Lord — institutional builder who carried Joseph Smith's revelations into the kingdom-in-the-wilderness

Young became leader of the Latter-day Saints in 1847 after Joseph Smith's assassination at Carthage, Illinois (1844). He led the principal Mormon migration west to the Salt Lake Valley (1847) — a multi-year mass migration of around seventy thousand people. As governor of Utah Territory (1851-58) and president of the Church for thirty years, he organized the political-theocratic settlement of the Great Basin, founded Brigham Young University, and defended polygamy as a divinely revealed institution against federal prosecution. The Mountain Meadows Massacre (1857) — the killing of about 120 Arkansas emigrants by Mormon militia and Paiute allies — occurred under his governance; his personal role has been debated for 165 years. Young's sermons (recorded in the "Journal of Discourses") are the principal nineteenth-century systematic theological corpus of the LDS tradition after Smith.

Key works

  • Journal of Discourses (26 vols, 1854-1886; principal sermon corpus)
  • Discourses of Brigham Young (compiled by John A. Widtsoe, 1925)
  • Many published sermons and letters

Declared Influences

LDS / Latter-day Saint Theology 35% Evangelical Protestantism 15% Transhumanism / Posthumanism 10% Liberation Theology -10% Reformed / Calvinist Theology -15%
LDS / Latter-day Saint Theology · 35%
Evangelical Protestantism · 15%
Transhumanism / Posthumanism · 10%
Liberation Theology · -10%
Reformed / Calvinist Theology · -15%

Young is the principal nineteenth-century institutional builder and second-generation systematizer of LDS theology after Joseph Smith; the Utah settlement and the surviving Mormon institutional structures are largely his work.

"This is the place." (1847, on first seeing the Salt Lake Valley)

Although the LDS Church is theologically distinct from confessional Protestantism, Young preserved the revival-evangelical preaching style and the Restorationist register he had received from Smith and from his pre-Mormon Methodist background.

"Preach the gospel of repentance and faith in Jesus Christ; preach it to the heart of every man." (Discourses of Brigham Young)

LDS theology's doctrine of human-divine continuity ("As man is, God once was; as God is, man may become") is one of the principal nineteenth-century religious sources for the transhumanist intuition of human deification; Young developed this strand of Smith's teaching most fully.

"As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be." (Lorenzo Snow couplet, drawing on Smith and Young)

Young's teaching of the priesthood-and-temple ban on Black men of African descent (instituted under his leadership in 1852; not lifted until 1978) is sharply opposed to the liberation-theological tradition's reading of God's identification with the oppressed.

"Cain slew Abel, and God put a mark upon him." (Discourses of Brigham Young, the 1852 teaching used to justify the priesthood ban)

Young, like Smith, repudiated the Reformed doctrines of total depravity, unconditional election, and the closed canon; the LDS movement defined itself in part against Reformed Protestantism.

"There are some doctrines preached as Bible truth that I am not prepared to swallow." (Discourses of Brigham Young, against creedal Reformed orthodoxy)

Internal Tensions

The Mountain Meadows Massacre and the Black priesthood ban are the two sharpest moral charges against Young's legacy; Church historians have apologized for both. The institutional achievement of organizing the Great Basin settlement is uncontested; the cost in indigenous displacement is increasingly acknowledged in current LDS-historical scholarship.

I. Time

Linear restoration time; the dispensation of the fullness of times culminating in Christ's return.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One

II. Space

Substantival infinite cosmos with multiple inhabited worlds (LDS cosmology).

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Substantival — Young, like Smith, held that all spirit is also matter, of a finer kind.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Plural embodied (and eternally embodied) observers. Personal metaphysical agency: the embodied Heavenly Father.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Mediated Knowledge Retainment: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Personal

V. Energy

Standard substantival physics within an embodied-deity cosmology.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Personal spirit conserved; eternal progression toward exaltation.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Classified works

Works in the atlas that Brigham Young authored or that draw on this persona's writings, with full attribute fingerprints of their own.

Authored · Career-spanning
Journal of Discourses
Sermons 1854-1886; published serially Liverpool / SLC 1854-1886 · Sermon-and-discourse collection (26 volumes)
Cites
The Book of Mormon
Joseph Smith (translated, on his own account, from golden plates inscribed by ancient American prophets and revealed by the angel Moroni; on the academic-historical account, composed by Smith between 1828 and 1830) · 1827–1830 (translated/dictated); 1830 (first published, Palmyra, New York)

Computed school proximity

The persona's attribute fingerprint scored against all 202 schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated influences above.

Philosophical neighbors

Other personas whose attribute fingerprint sits closest to Brigham Young's — intellectual neighbors across traditions and eras.

How Brigham Young resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 5 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Is the universe running out of usable energy?
The heat death of the universe — entropy maxed out, no further work possible — is among the more sobering implications of mainstream physics. Whether it is structurally inescapable depends on what kind of finitude the cosmos has.
Both time and matter are unbounded; 'running out' is misframed.
On this view, the cosmos has neither a temporal horizon nor a material exhaustion point. The framing of running out presupposes bounds that the cosmos doesn't have. Energy gradients perpetuate; new configurations emerge; the categories that make heat-death scary don't apply at the cosmic scale.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. (47%) · Time both has and lacks bounds depending on the level you ask at; finitude is conventional. (26%) · The cosmos has bounds; heat death is a real horizon. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so?
Whether we can grow our way out of resource constraints — or whether the cosmos sets limits the economy ultimately must obey — depends on what kind of finitude matter has.
Resources are practically inexhaustible on cosmic scales; terrestrial limits are engineering.
On this view, matter and time are both unbounded at the largest scales. Terrestrial resource limits are real engineering and political constraints but not metaphysical ones; the cosmos can in principle support whatever expansion intelligence is capable of.
Roads not taken Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. (47%) · The finitude question is level-dependent; resource ethics happens at the level that constrains us. (26%) · Resources are finite in the strict sense; living well requires accepting the limit. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide?
If we owe future people a habitable planet and the material means to flourish, and the cosmos is bounded in ways that make those obligations impossible at some scale, the obligation and the possibility come apart. Where they come apart turns on what kind of finitude we live in.
Both time and matter are unbounded; we cannot in principle owe more than is possible.
On this view, the cosmos has the resources to support whatever flourishing future generations are capable of, given sufficient time and intelligence. The impossibility concern is misplaced; the real questions are about trajectories and choices, not about resource ceilings.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. (47%) · The owing-and-possibility question is level-dependent; we owe what is appropriate at the level we act on. (26%) · The cosmos is bounded; our obligations to future generations are bounded with it. (12%)
6 mainstream positions
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 2 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

35 mainstream positions
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. 65% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 37% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 37% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 37% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 35% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 33% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 33% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 33% Could an AI have a mind that matters? No — minds are not the kind of thing we engineer. 30% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Moral standing comparable to humans requires what only humans have. 29% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Without ensoulment, an organoid is tissue, not a person. 29% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 29% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 29% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 29% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. 29% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 28% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 28% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 28% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? The community is saved together or not at all. 14% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through received divine self-disclosure. 12%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream

Films Referencing This Persona (1)

Either directly referenced in the film, or reading the film through one of this persona's top schools.

Experiments Engaging This Persona's Schools

Surface via influence-schools that respond to the experiment. Each entry shows the school through which the connection runs.

Bostrom's Simulation Argument
via transhumanism-posthumanism · Affirms / takes the bait
Sympathetic: technological maturity makes ancestor-simulations plausible, and the population reasoning gives them ontological weight.
Voyager 1 Crossing the Heliopause
via transhumanism-posthumanism · Affirms / takes the bait
A landmark of humanity's technological extension into space; the Voyagers carry Golden Records as artifacts of human cultural presence beyond the heliosphere.
The Veil of Ignorance
via liberation-theology · Denies / rejects the premise
Liberation theology denies the abstraction: justice is reasoned from the concrete position of the oppressed, not from a hypothetical neutral standpoint that erases the structural …
The Drowning Child
via liberation-theology · Affirms / takes the bait
Sympathetic to the universalist demand, but locates the obligation structurally rather than individually: the duty is to dismantle systems producing distant suffering, not just to …
Milgram's Obedience Experiments
via liberation-theology · Affirms / takes the bait
Vindicates structural readings of evil: oppressive systems are sustained not by exceptional malice but by the ordinary obedience of ordinary people. Implication: structural transformation, not …
Frankfurt Cases
via reformed-calvinist-theology · Affirms / takes the bait
Compatible with Reformed compatibilism: God's sovereignty determines all outcomes, yet humans are morally responsible for actions arising from their own wills. Frankfurt cases secularise an …
The Violinist
via reformed-calvinist-theology · Denies / rejects the premise
The right-to-life of the unborn is treated as a divine command, not as a consequence of bodily-rights reasoning; the violinist analogy is rejected on theological …
Pascal's Wager
via reformed-calvinist-theology · Denies / rejects the premise
Saving faith is the work of the Holy Spirit, not a calculated wager. Pascalian belief is at best a precursor; at worst a substitute that …
← #190 Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) All Personas #192 Guru Gobind Singh →