School #107

Black Radical Tradition

Crystallised by Cedric Robinson, *Black Marxism* (1983); drawing on Du Bois, C.L.R. James, Aimé Césaire, Frantz Fanon, Walter Rodney, Angela Davis, Audre Lorde, and the long resistance traditions of the African diaspora.

The Black Radical Tradition is the lineage of intellectual and political work that takes the experience of African-descended peoples under racial capitalism — slavery, colonialism, segregation, mass incarceration, ongoing dispossession — as the analytic centre, and develops the conceptual resources (racial capitalism, the wretched of the earth, the undercommons, abolition) needed to think and contest that experience. It draws on, modifies, and contests both Marxist and liberal frameworks.

Worldview

Modern capitalism is constitutively racialised; the African diaspora's experience of unfreedom is not an exception to modernity but one of its constitutive conditions; emancipation requires the dismantling of the structural arrangements that produce racial domination.

Moral Implications

Solidarity with the disposable, the imprisoned, the colonised; refusal of the false universals that abstract from race; the cultivation of community institutions and practices outside the dominant racial-capitalist order.

Practical Implications

The Black Radical Tradition has shaped twentieth-century anti-colonial movements, the U.S. civil-rights and Black Power movements, contemporary abolitionist politics, and the academic fields of African and African-American studies, ethnic studies, and critical race theory.

I. Time

Time, in the Black Radical Tradition, is the long durée of slavery, colonialism, and their afterlives, against which insurgent practices have been mobilised for centuries. The tradition rejects the progressivist temporality of liberal modernity that treats racial domination as a residue being steadily overcome, insisting instead on the persistence of the structures of unfreedom in transmuted form — Saidiya Hartman's afterlife of slavery, the New Jim Crow analysed by Michelle Alexander. Yet the tradition is not despairing: it inhabits the time of Black insurgent memory, in which the resistances of the past — the Haitian Revolution, the Reconstruction, the freedom struggles of the twentieth century — remain live resources for present action. Time is therefore neither a closed cycle of repetition nor a smooth ascent but a contested medium in which past struggles and future possibilities continue to shape what can be done now. The tradition's historical imagination is one of its primary political resources.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space, in the Black Radical Tradition, is structured by the spatial regimes that racial capitalism has imposed and contested: the slave ship, the plantation, the colony, the ghetto, the prison, the border, and against these the maroon settlement, the Black church, the freedom school, the undercommons of Stefano Harney and Fred Moten. Geographers like Katherine McKittrick have made explicit how Black geographies have been produced both by domination and by the persistent counter-spatial practices of those subjected to it. The tradition therefore reads space as relational and political rather than as a neutral container, attending to who is permitted to inhabit which spaces and on what terms. Diasporic space — the long Atlantic connections that Paul Gilroy traced in The Black Atlantic — is itself a constitutive geography for the tradition's intellectual and political life. Liberation is in part the production of spaces in which Black life can be lived in its fullness.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter, in the Black Radical Tradition, is registered first in the embodied condition of those whose labouring and racialised bodies have been treated as fungible matter by the systems of slavery, colonialism, and incarceration. Frantz Fanon's account of the lived experience of the racialised body in Black Skin, White Masks made the materiality of racism unavoidable, and Hortense Spillers's later analysis of flesh and body in 'Mama's Baby, Papa's Maybe' deepened it. The tradition treats matter as relational rather than as inert substance: what a body is permitted to do, where it can go, and how it is read are constituted within structures of racial capitalism. The recovery of the body — through cultural practice, communal celebration, and political mobilisation — is therefore a substantive part of emancipatory work. Land, too, is matter under contestation, since dispossession of land has been integral to the racial-capitalist order the tradition diagnoses.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Observers are embodied, racialised, plural, and situated within the historical structures of racial capitalism. The Black diasporic experience is treated not as a particular within the universal but as a vantage that exposes the partiality of the supposed universal.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Mediated Retainment of Knowledge: Partial Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: None Moral Authority: Experience Theological Method: Critical

V. Energy

Energy, in the Black Radical Tradition, names the extracted and stolen labour-power on which racial capitalism has historically been built — the bodies worked to death in the plantation, the mine, and the prison, and the persistent extraction of vitality from racialised communities into the metropolitan core. Cedric Robinson's account of racial capitalism in Black Marxism, and Walter Rodney's earlier diagnosis in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, both insist that the energetic substrate of modern accumulation cannot be understood apart from the racial division of who labours and who profits. Against this extraction stand the counter-energies of Black insurgent practice: the maroon communities, the slave revolts, the freedom songs, the long endurance of mutual aid in the face of dispossession. The tradition therefore reads energy through the dual register of expropriation and refusal. Liberation requires not only the redistribution of material resources but the recovery of communal vitality from the structures that have systematically drained it.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Information, in the Black Radical Tradition, is the transmitted knowledge of survival, resistance, and self-understanding that has been carried across the rupture of the Middle Passage and the long aftermath of racial domination. The slave narratives, the spirituals and the blues, the Negro press, the pamphlets of Walker and Garvey, the scholarship of Du Bois and the Black studies tradition he helped found are all carriers of this information against systematic attempts to erase it. The tradition treats the production and circulation of knowledge as itself a site of contestation, since the dominant archive has often functioned to render Black life unintelligible or invisible. Audre Lorde's insistence on the necessity of one's own language, and the work of writers from Aimé Césaire to Sylvia Wynter on the construction of the modern category of the human, exemplify the informational labour the tradition continues to undertake. Information is therefore relational, contested, and inseparable from the politics of who is permitted to know and to be known.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Non-conserved Granularity: Continuous
← #106 Protestant Reformation (Magisterial) All Schools #108 Utilitarianism →

Works that name Black Radical Tradition in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

30%
West India Emancipation (Mid)
Frederick Douglass · 1857 (delivered August 3, 1857, Canandaigua, NY)
26%
No Name in the Street (Late)
James Baldwin · 1972
25%
The Black Unicorn (Mid)
Audre Lorde · 1978
25%
Coal (Mid)
Audre Lorde · 1976 (drawing on poems from 1968 onward)
25%
The Bluest Eye (Mid)
Toni Morrison · 1970
25%
Sula (Mid)
Toni Morrison · 1973
25%
Song of Solomon (Mid)
Toni Morrison · 1977
25%
Jazz (Late)
Toni Morrison · 1992
25%
Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism (Early)
bell hooks · 1981
25%
Self-Made Men (Mid-Late)
Frederick Douglass · 1859-93 (repeatedly delivered)
25%
Rivonia Trial Statement (Mid)
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela · 1964 (April 20, 1964)
25%
Letters from Prison (Mid)
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela · 1962-1990
25%
Stride Toward Freedom (Early)
Martin Luther King Jr. · 1958
25%
Why We Can't Wait (Mid)
Martin Luther King Jr. · 1964
25%
Where Do We Go from Here (Late)
Martin Luther King Jr. · 1967
22%
If Beale Street Could Talk (Late)
James Baldwin · 1974
22%
Martin & Malcolm & America (Mid-to-late)
James Cone · 1991
20%
Zami: A New Spelling of My Name (Late)
Audre Lorde · 1982
20%
A Burst of Light (Late)
Audre Lorde · 1988
20%
Atlantis (Mid)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · 1967-69 (recorded), 1969 (released)
20%
Lanquidity (Late)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · 1978 (recorded August 17, 1978; released 1978)
20%
The Magic City (Mid)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · 1965 (recorded), 1966 (released)
20%
Sun Ra Discography (Late)
Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount) · c. 1957-1993 (recordings); compiled discography in scholarship 1990s-onward
20%
Critique of Black Reason (Late)
Achille Mbembe · 2013 (French), 2017 (English)
20%
Dreams from My Father (Early)
Barack H. Obama · 1995
20%
Inaugural Address (Late)
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela · 1994 (May 10, 1994)
20%
Conversations with Myself (Late)
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela · c. 1962-2010 (materials); 2010 (compiled)
20%
The Drum Major Instinct (Late)
Martin Luther King Jr. · 1968 (February 4)
20%
Wild Seed (Mid)
Octavia E. Butler · 1980
18%
Another Country (Middle)
James Baldwin · 1962
15%
On the Postcolony (Mid)
Achille Mbembe · 2000 (French), 2001 (English)
15%
Necropolitics (Mature)
Achille Mbembe · 2003 (essay), 2016 (book — French), 2019 (book — English)
15%
Brutalism (Late)
Achille Mbembe · 2020 (French), 2024 (English)
15%
All About Love (Late)
bell hooks · 2000
15%
Dawn (Mid)
Octavia E. Butler · 1987
15%
Fledgling (Late)
Octavia E. Butler · 2005
15%
Bloodchild and Other Stories (Mid)
Octavia E. Butler · 1995 (1st ed.), 2005 (2nd ed.)
10%
Teaching to Transgress (Mid)
bell hooks · 1994
10%
The Will to Change (Late)
bell hooks · 2004

How Black Radical Tradition resolves each dilemma

56 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 16 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 1 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money is the ledger of obligations among real people.
On relational views, money is not a substance you have; it is a record of who owes whom what. Debts and credits are real because the relations they track are real — to kin, to community, to ancestors, to land. Money is the form this …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (54%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people.
On relational views, the nation is the relational fabric — extended kinship, ancestral inheritance, shared ecology, communal practice — that hosts a people across generations. Borders matter less than belonging; lineage and land carry the weight that political structures only ratify.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (54%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · “Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together. (8%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition.
On relational views, identity is not a property a person has alone; it is constituted by the web of recognition the person sits in. What makes someone a man or a woman in any thick sense is the relations of kinship, community, ritual, and recognition …
Roads not taken Sex is a real biological kind with given content. (54%) · Gender is constructed; what counts as male or female reflects practice. (16%) · “Male” and “female” are family-resemblance terms — no single essence. (8%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
Should we edit the human germline?
Whether human nature is a given biological kind, a constructed category, a relational achievement, a family-resemblance cluster, or a conventional distinction within deeper unity is the ontological question the policy debate over heritable gene editing is mostly about.
Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric.
On relational views, what makes someone a person is the web of kinship, ancestry, and community they sit in — not a property the body carries alone. Heritable editing intervenes in exactly this fabric: the lineage that ancestors handed on, the descent that descendants will …
Roads not taken Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. (54%) · The categories we count as 'human' are emergent from practice; germline editing is a practice-revision like any other. (16%) · 'Human nature' is a cluster term without a single essence; the editing question is empirical, not metaphysical. (8%)
Distinctive · only 16% of schools agree (33/202)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance.
On this view, matter is not a stuff but a patterning — the standing relations among things, ancestors, processes, and places. The creatio-ex-nihilo question doesn't quite arise, because the ontology has no slot for a free-standing substance to be created or eternal. What persists is …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (55%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (21/202)
What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize?
Religious traditions differ not only in what they believe, but in how authority is structured — and what counts as the right kind of argument.
Historical-critical method is the authority.
Religious claims are evaluated by the same critical-historical standards as any other claim.
Roads not taken The category does not apply — the school is non-religious. (44%) · Direct experiential union is the authority. (16%) · Institutional teaching tradition is the authority. (14%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation.
On relational views, person was never the name of a thing that exists on its own — it is the name of a node in a web of recognition, obligation, kinship, and ecology. The question of when a being becomes a person is the question …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (54%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · The question presupposes a fact of the matter that isn’t there. (8%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates.
On relational views, marriage is not a thing in itself but a node in a web — a configuration of obligations to children, extended kin, ancestors, ecology, and community. Its definition is what the network of relations is, and any attempt to specify it apart …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (54%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Marriage” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
What is our place in nature?
Whether humans are masters of nature, members of nature, or makers of nature is not a question climate science can settle. It depends on what nature is, what we are, and what kind of relationship is possible between us.
Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world.
On these views, humans were never outside nature, and the question of our 'place in' it is the question of how to live within the relations that already constitute us. Plants, animals, rivers, ancestors, descendants are not resources or stage scenery; they are kin and …
Roads not taken Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. (48%) · Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. (15%) · Subject to a real natural order we did not make. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (30/202)
Should we colonize space?
The drive to extend human presence beyond Earth is sometimes framed as the next chapter of stewardship, sometimes as hubris, sometimes as escape from problems we ought to solve here. Which it is depends on what we take our relationship to nature to be.
Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking.
On relational views, space colonisation is the abstract endpoint of the same pattern that produced ecological crisis on Earth: humans treating themselves as separate from the more-than-human world they are actually inside. To go to Mars in the spirit of leaving Earth is to leave …
Roads not taken Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. (48%) · The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. (15%) · Nature includes its limits; colonisation is bounded by what the cosmos allows. (12%)
31 mainstream positions
Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Editing the genome cuts into the relational fabric; we should be very slow. 15% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is real but always known from a perspective. 16% What happens to "you" when you die? You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. 18% Does history have a direction or meaning? History is the gradual unfolding of improvement or liberation. 23% Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Moral obligation tracks the relations one is in; distance does matter, structurally. 50% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer changes the pray-er, not the prayed-for. 49% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Coincidence is exactly what the math says it is. The pattern is in the noticer. 49% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The observer is in time; foreknowledge across times raises real freedom problems. 46% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditators are bounded observers reporting unusual brain states; the 'timeless' is metaphorical. 46% Does prayer change God's mind? If there is an addressee at all, it is in time; prayer is communication, and may genuinely change what comes next. 46% Are the dead morally present to the living? Observers are bounded by their own moment, and no further agency makes the dead present. 44% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous fields, classical limits, analog deep structure. 37% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous Jamesian stream, phenomenological lived time. 37% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Reconstructed — continuous re-narrating, no fixed engrams. 37% What makes someone the same person over time? You are your body — continuity is bodily continuity. 36% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? Same body, same person — even when the cognitive pattern has changed. 36% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? Different body, different person — you died in the scanner. 36% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. 17% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. 17% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no first-person experience, so no knowing in the relevant sense. 17% Could an AI have a mind that matters? An AI’s standing is constituted by the relations it enters. 15% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through historical-critical engagement and the working-out of contradictions. 13% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? An animal's standing is constituted by its place in the relational fabric. 11% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? The organoid's standing is constituted by the relations of care around its production. 11%
1 unaligned
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (202)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202