School #71

Baha'i Faith

Baha'u'llah, 'Abdu'l-Baha

The Baha'i Faith, founded by Baha'u'llah (1817–1892) and authoritatively interpreted by 'Abdu'l-Baha (1844–1921), holds that there is one God, unknowable in essence, who has progressively revealed divine truth to humanity through a series of Manifestations (Prophets) — Abraham, Moses, Buddha, Jesus, Muhammad, and now Baha'u'llah — each suited to the capacity and needs of their age. This doctrine of progressive revelation means that religious truth is not static but unfolds through history in an ever-advancing civilization. God’s essence is utterly transcendent and unknowable; what we know of God comes only through the Manifestations, who are perfect mirrors reflecting divine attributes into the human world. The cosmos emanates eternally from God: creation has no temporal beginning, because a Creator without creation is a contradiction; yet the world is wholly dependent on God and has no independent existence. 'Abdu'l-Baha’s 'Some Answered Questions' articulates a metaphysics of emanation: the physical world is the outermost expression of a spiritual reality that flows from God through the Manifestations to humanity. The unity of humanity is the central social teaching: all races, nations, and religions are expressions of a single divine purpose, and the establishment of world unity is the destined outcome of this age.

Worldview

The Baha'i adherent inhabits a cosmos that is the outermost expression of an eternally creative God, structured by progressive revelation and oriented toward the unity of humanity. To hold this ontology is to feel that every religion is a chapter in a single, unfolding divine story, and that the present age is the threshold of humanity's collective maturity. The fundamental orientation is one of confident universalism: truth is one but its expression is progressive, the diversity of cultures and religions enriches rather than fragments the human family, and the establishment of world unity is not a utopian dream but the destined outcome of this stage of civilization. Reality feels purposeful, interconnected, and advancing, not toward a final apocalypse but toward an ever-advancing civilization guided by divine revelation. The framework reads this as Personal metaphysical agency: God in the Baha'i Faith, though essentially unknowable, is approached as a personal divine agent through the Manifestations (Baha'u'llah, the Bab, and prior Messengers) who hear, address, and guide humanity. The framework reads this as Tradition-grounded moral authority: the writings of Baha'u'llah and the prior Manifestations, read in continuity with progressive revelation and under the authority of the Universal House of Justice and the Guardianship, together constitute the standard — Scripture and its institutional Tradition jointly.

Moral Implications

The ethical framework of the Baha'i Faith is grounded in the unity of humanity and the independent investigation of truth. Because all human beings are created by one God and reflect divine attributes, prejudice of any kind, whether racial, national, religious, or gender-based, is a fundamental moral error. Responsibility is both individual and collective: each person must investigate truth independently rather than accepting tradition blindly, while also contributing to the collective project of building a just, unified global civilization. The tradition emphasizes consultation (shura) as the primary method of collective decision-making, replacing adversarial debate with a process of selfless truth-seeking.

Practical Implications

Practically, the Baha'i Faith drives a global program of community building, education, and social action centered on the principles of universal education, the elimination of extremes of wealth and poverty, and the equality of women and men. It shapes attitudes toward governance through its advocacy for a world federal system, an international auxiliary language, and a universal system of weights and measures. The Baha'i emphasis on the harmony of science and religion encourages engagement with scientific inquiry while maintaining a spiritual framework for interpreting its results.

I. Time

Time is infinite and emergent — creation has no temporal beginning, because 'Abdu'l-Baha argues that a Creator without creation is inconceivable; God has always been creating. Time emerges from the divine creative act rather than existing as an independent container. Time is continuous, linear, and uni-directional: history advances through progressive cycles of revelation, each building on the previous, moving humanity toward collective maturity. Freedom is non-deterministic: human beings possess free will and are responsible for their choices, though the broad direction of history is guided by divine purpose.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is infinite and emergent — created by God’s will and sustained by the divine creative power. Space is undefined in curvature: the Baha’i writings do not specify geometric structure but affirm that the cosmos is vast beyond human comprehension. Space is non-local: God’s creative power pervades all of existence without being confined to any location; the Manifestations serve as channels through which the divine presence is made accessible everywhere.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Undefined Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

III. Matter

Matter is infinite and emergent — the physical world is the outermost expression of a spiritual reality emanating from God. 'Abdu'l-Baha teaches that the cosmos has always existed in some form, though particular arrangements of matter come and go. Matter is conserved: the physical world operates according to stable, divinely ordained laws. It is non-local: the spiritual and material dimensions of reality interpenetrate; the physical world is not a separate or fallen realm but a reflection of spiritual realities.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

IV. Observer

The human observer is a rational soul created by God, endowed with free will and the capacity for spiritual growth. Each person occupies a single moment and a single place during earthly life. Knowledge is immediate: the human mind cannot comprehend God’s essence directly but can know God through the Manifestations and through the investigation of reality using both reason and revelation. Knowledge retainment is total: the soul is immortal and carries its spiritual attainments into the afterlife; 'Abdu'l-Baha teaches that the soul progresses eternally through spiritual worlds after death. Physicality is both: the observer is embodied during earthly life but the rational soul is not material and survives the body’s death. Agency is active: the Baha’i writings emphasize the independent investigation of truth as a fundamental principle; no one should accept truth passively on the authority of tradition alone. Multiple observers share a common world and are called to recognize the essential unity of humanity; the diversity of perspectives enriches rather than fragments the collective search for truth.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Immediate Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Personal Moral Authority: Revelation Theological Method: Magisterial

V. Energy

Energy is infinite and emergent — it flows from God’s creative will as part of the emanative process that sustains the cosmos. 'Abdu'l-Baha describes creation as an eternal emanation: God has always been creating, and the outpouring of divine creative power is unceasing. Conservation holds: the physical laws governing energy are expressions of the divine order and are reliable and consistent. Dispersibility is reversible: the Baha’i teaching of progressive revelation implies that spiritual energy periodically renews civilization — each new Manifestation reverses the decline of the previous dispensation and infuses fresh divine energy into human affairs.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Information is emergent and conserved — divine truth is progressively revealed through the Manifestations, each of whom brings a fuller expression of eternal principles suited to humanity’s evolving capacity. Information is conserved because the essential spiritual truths are never lost; they are restated and deepened with each new revelation. The Baha’i writings, the Bible, the Quran, and the scriptures of all world religions are complementary repositories of a single unfolding truth. Information is continuous because divine revelation is an unbroken, ever-advancing process. The framework places this as conserved at both scales: divine truth is eternal and progressively revealed at the cosmic scale, and at the personal-identity scale the soul is conserved — it continues its eternal journey of advancement after the death of the body.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Emergent Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Films Reading Through This School (1)

← #70 Platonism (Classical) All Schools #72 Hermeticism →

Works that name Baha'i Faith in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

50%
Letters to the Son of the Wolf (Last (less than a year before his 1892 death))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1891 (composed in 'Akká)
45%
Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Late (the major late doctrinal-legal book))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1873 (in 'Akká, the prison-city where Bahá'u'lláh was exiled)
40%
Kitáb-i-Íqán (Mid (pre-declaration in 1863))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1862 (composed in Baghdad in two days and two nights, in response to questions from one of the Báb's maternal uncles)
40%
The Hidden Words (Early)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1858
35%
Seven Valleys and Four Valleys (Early (composed before the 1863 proclamation))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1856 (Seven Valleys) and c. 1858 (Four Valleys), both Baghdad period
30%
Tablets to the Political Leaders (Mature)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1860s-70s
30%
Tablet of Ahmad (Mature)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1865
30%
Tabernacle of Unity (Late)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1880s
30%
Words of Paradise (Kalimát-i-Firdawsiyyih) (Late)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1890
5%
The Quran
Considered by Muslims the direct word of God; transmitted through Muhammad; collected under 'Uthmān (c. 650) · c. 610–632 AD (the period of the Prophet's mission); 'Uthmānic codex c. 650

Personas with Baha'i Faith as a declared influence

75%  Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) 5%  Guru Nānak Dev Ji

How Baha'i Faith resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 11 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/208)
Is the universe running out of usable energy?
The heat death of the universe — entropy maxed out, no further work possible — is among the more sobering implications of mainstream physics. Whether it is structurally inescapable depends on what kind of finitude the cosmos has.
Both time and matter are unbounded; 'running out' is misframed.
On this view, the cosmos has neither a temporal horizon nor a material exhaustion point. The framing of running out presupposes bounds that the cosmos doesn't have. Energy gradients perpetuate; new configurations emerge; the categories that make heat-death scary don't apply at the cosmic scale.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. (47%) · Time both has and lacks bounds depending on the level you ask at; finitude is conventional. (26%) · The cosmos has bounds; heat death is a real horizon. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/208)
Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so?
Whether we can grow our way out of resource constraints — or whether the cosmos sets limits the economy ultimately must obey — depends on what kind of finitude matter has.
Resources are practically inexhaustible on cosmic scales; terrestrial limits are engineering.
On this view, matter and time are both unbounded at the largest scales. Terrestrial resource limits are real engineering and political constraints but not metaphysical ones; the cosmos can in principle support whatever expansion intelligence is capable of.
Roads not taken Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. (47%) · The finitude question is level-dependent; resource ethics happens at the level that constrains us. (26%) · Resources are finite in the strict sense; living well requires accepting the limit. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/208)
Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide?
If we owe future people a habitable planet and the material means to flourish, and the cosmos is bounded in ways that make those obligations impossible at some scale, the obligation and the possibility come apart. Where they come apart turns on what kind of finitude we live in.
Both time and matter are unbounded; we cannot in principle owe more than is possible.
On this view, the cosmos has the resources to support whatever flourishing future generations are capable of, given sufficient time and intelligence. The impossibility concern is misplaced; the real questions are about trajectories and choices, not about resource ceilings.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. (47%) · The owing-and-possibility question is level-dependent; we owe what is appropriate at the level we act on. (26%) · The cosmos is bounded; our obligations to future generations are bounded with it. (12%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing.
On this view, matter is genuinely there, but it isn't the floor of reality. It depends on something more fundamental — dependent origination, mind, divine sustaining act, computational substrate, or the structure of conditions — and is conserved only at its own level of description. …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Is the physical world fully real?
Realists, idealists, and relationalists divide on whether matter exists mind-independently, derivatively, or as a pattern of relations. The split runs deeper than any single scientific question.
Real but sustained — not mind-independent in the strict realist sense.
On this view, the physical world is real enough — it has its own laws, its own conservation principles, its own resistance to wish — but it is not the floor of being. It is sustained by something else: mind, divine attention, computational substrate, or …
Roads not taken Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. (56%) · Real as relations — neither pure substance nor pure construction. (16%) · Real for this cycle — the deepest reality cycles through creation and dissolution. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Does matter have intrinsic moral standing?
Do rocks, soil, rivers, and stuff in general deserve moral consideration — or only the living, the conscious, the human? The answer turns on what matter is.
Matter is morally considerable derivatively — through what it sustains.
On this view, matter doesn't have standing on its own; it has standing through what it makes possible. Soil matters because it grows food; water matters because it sustains life and mind and practice. Asking whether the rock as such has moral standing slightly misreads …
Roads not taken Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. (56%) · Matter has intrinsic moral standing as part of the relational fabric. (16%) · Matter is in flux; standing is impermanent and ritual-mediated. (4%)
4 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/208)
Is environmental damage ever truly permanent?
Extinction is forever; soil erosion takes centuries to repair; the carbon we emit will warm the climate for millennia. But whether 'forever' or 'millennia' means what they say depends on what kind of process the universe is.
What appears irreversible is reversible by the right action.
On this view, the appearance of permanence is a function of limits we have not yet exceeded. Divine action, sufficiently advanced technology, intentional restoration practice can in principle reverse what now appears irreversible. The lost is not gone for good; it is gone for now.
Roads not taken Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. (66%) · Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. (18%) · From the standpoint of the One, the categories of permanence and loss are conventional. (8%)
Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/208)
Can a civilization recover from collapse?
Rome fell; Maya cities emptied; Bronze Age trade networks collapsed in a single generation. Whether what was lost can be recovered — or whether collapse is structurally final — depends on what kind of process civilization is.
Civilization is the kind of order that can in principle be restored.
On this view, the order that constitutes civilization — information, practices, institutions, ethics — is not destroyed by collapse, only dispersed. Given the right work, by humans, divine action, or both, it can be reconstituted. The historical pattern of recovery and renewal is partial evidence; …
Roads not taken Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. (66%) · Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. (18%) · From the One's vantage, civilizational categories are themselves conventional. (8%)
Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/208)
Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally?
The universe trends from order to disorder. Whether that physical pattern carries moral weight — making the preservation of order, beauty, complexity a kind of cosmic duty — depends on whether time has the kind of structure morality could lean on.
Apparent entropy is reversible in principle; the moral category is restoration.
On this view, the second law describes local pattern rather than cosmic destiny. What is broken can be repaired — by divine action, by human work, by energetic intervention. The moral weight of restoration is real and not borrowed from the physics. The cosmos is …
Roads not taken Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. (66%) · Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. (18%) · From the One's vantage, the second law is itself a feature of the conventional, not the ultimate. (8%)
Distinctive · only 13% of schools agree (28/208)
What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize?
Religious traditions differ not only in what they believe, but in how authority is structured — and what counts as the right kind of argument.
Institutional teaching tradition is the authority.
Scripture, tradition, and the institutional magisterium together carry revealed truth.
Roads not taken The category does not apply — the school is non-religious. (42%) · Direct experiential union is the authority. (16%) · Historical-critical method is the authority. (10%)
Distinctive · only 19% of schools agree (40/208)
Does history have a direction or meaning?
Is history the unfolding of progress, the recovery of lost truth, a cyclical recurrence, the approach of consummation — or none of these?
History is oriented toward a decisive consummation.
Time culminates in judgment, kingdom, resurrection, or ultimate fulfillment.
Roads not taken History is not where the deepest truth lives. (36%) · History is the gradual unfolding of improvement or liberation. (23%) · History recurs in cosmic cycles. (17%)
32 mainstream positions
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 55% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 55% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 50% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 50% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 50% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 38% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 38% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 38% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 37% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 34% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 34% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 34% Could an AI have a mind that matters? No — minds are not the kind of thing we engineer. 31% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Moral standing comparable to humans requires what only humans have. 30% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Without ensoulment, an organoid is tissue, not a person. 30% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 30% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 30% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 30% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 30% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 30% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 30% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. 29% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? The community is saved together or not at all. 14% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through received divine self-disclosure. 13%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208