Laughter
Bergson's 1900 short essay on the comic — laughter as a social corrective applied to the mechanical encrustation on the living
Tradition: French process philosophy / philosophy of aesthetics
We laugh at "the mechanical encrusted upon the living" — laughter is the social corrective for inflexibility
Bergson's 1900 essay developed a comprehensive theory of the comic from a single thesis: we laugh when we perceive something mechanical, automatic, rigid, or repetitive in what should be supple, living, and adaptive — "du mécanique plaqué sur du vivant" (the mechanical encrusted upon the living). The man who slips on a banana skin, the absent-minded professor, the puppet-like character of farce, the rigid mannerism — all instance a deviation from the suppleness life requires, and laughter is the social corrective that punishes such deviation. The essay applies this thesis to comic situations, comic characters, comic words, and comic art, showing how a wide range of comic phenomena reduce to variations on the central pattern. Foundational text in twentieth-century aesthetics of humour, and an important early statement of the durée-and-élan framework before Creative Evolution made it explicit.
Author
Editions cited
- Le Rire: Essai sur la signification du comique (Revue de Paris, 1900; book Alcan, 1900; revised through 23rd edn 1924); English trans. Cloudesley Brereton & Fred Rothwell, Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (Macmillan, 1911)
School Embodiments
The book is a sustained illustration of the durée framework: life is suppleness, adaptation, continuous becoming; the mechanical is its frozen negation; laughter exposes the freezing.
"The attitudes, gestures and movements of the human body are laughable in exact proportion as that body reminds us of a mere machine." (Laughter, ch. 1)
The social function of laughter — its role as evolutionary-social corrective enforcing flexibility — is treated naturalistically, as an adaptation of the species.
"Laughter must be something of this kind, a sort of social gesture. By the fear which it inspires, it restrains eccentricity, keeps constantly awake and in mutual contact certain activities of a secondary order which might retire into their shell and go to sleep." (Laughter, ch. 1)
Close descriptive attention to the comic phenomena themselves — slapstick, the comic character, the wordplay — gives the essay its phenomenological-aesthetic character.
"To understand laughter, we must put it back into its natural environment, which is society, and above all we must determine the utility of its function, which is a social one." (Laughter, ch. 1)
The functional account — laughter as a tool the species uses to enforce social adaptation — is pragmatist in shape, treating mental and social phenomena in terms of their work.
"Laughter is, above all, a corrective. Being intended to humiliate, it must make a painful impression on the person against whom it is directed." (Laughter, ch. 3)
The book is realist about social function: laughter does something in the social world, it is not a mere private affect.
"By laughter, society avenges itself for the liberties taken with it." (Laughter, ch. 3)
The "spirit" or "soul" that comic deviation betrays into mechanism is closer to an idealist than to a materialist anthropology.
"The comic is that side of a person which reveals his likeness to a thing, that aspect of human events which, through its peculiar inelasticity, conveys the impression of pure mechanism." (Laughter, ch. 2)
Internal Tensions
Bergson's theory captures slapstick and the comedy of inflexibility well, but fits less well to wit, irony, satire, or the comedy of recognition. Twentieth-century theorists (Freud, Bakhtin, Frye) added incongruity-, relief-, and carnival-theories of the comic that Laughter does not subsume. The "social corrective" framing also raises the question — pressed by feminist and postcolonial critics — about who counts as the laughing community and whose deviation is being punished.
I. Time
The temporal contrast: living adaptation is continuous becoming, the mechanical is repetition — laughter exposes the freezing of duration into automatism.
Attributes
II. Space
The body as the immediate site of comic deviation — the comic body slips, repeats, mechanises in ways the living body should not.
Attributes
III. Matter
Material rigidity (the puppet, the machine) is the comic's emblem of what life ought not to become.
Attributes
IV. Observer
The social spectator whose laughter enforces flexibility — laughter requires audience.
Attributes
V. Energy
The energies of social pressure that laughter mobilises against deviation.
Attributes
VI. Information
The pattern of recognition by which the comic deviation is identified as mechanical against the living norm.
Attributes
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How Laughter resolves each dilemma
48 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 10 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 9 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.
6 mainstream positions
Matter · 7 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.
4 mainstream positions
Observer · 37 dilemmas · 4 distinctive
Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.