School #47

Sufism / Wahdat al-Wujud

Ibn Arabi, Rumi, Al-Qunawi

Wahdat al-Wujud (Unity of Being) holds that only God (al-Haqq, "the Real") truly exists, and that all creation is God's perpetual self-disclosure (tajalli) — real but not self-sustaining, possessing borrowed existence that depends at every instant on the divine source. Ibn Arabi's 'Fusus al-Hikam' ('Bezels of Wisdom', 1229) is the tradition's metaphysical masterwork, presenting each biblical and Quranic prophet as the bearer of a unique "bezel" or facet of divine wisdom; his monumental 'Al-Futuhat al-Makkiyya' ('Meccan Revelations') elaborates a cosmos of imaginal worlds and perpetual creation (khalq jadid) in which God renews existence at every instant. Jalal al-Din Rumi's 'Masnavi' ('Spiritual Couplets', c. 1258-73), a vast poem of some 25,000 verses, translates these metaphysical insights into ecstatic narrative: the reed flute's lament for separation from the reed-bed is the soul's longing for reunion with its divine origin. Sadr al-Din al-Qunawi, Ibn Arabi's foremost disciple, systematized his master's teachings and brought them into dialogue with the philosophical tradition of Ibn Sina.

Worldview

The Sufi of the Wahdat al-Wujud tradition experiences reality as the continuous self-disclosure of a single divine Being — everything that exists is a mirror reflecting God's infinite attributes, and the apparent multiplicity of the world is a veil over this underlying unity. To hold this ontology is to feel simultaneously the ache of separation (the soul's longing for its divine source, as Rumi's reed flute laments) and the ecstasy of recognition (the realization that the Beloved was never truly absent). The world shimmers with theophanic significance: every face, every leaf, every event is a fresh self-revelation of al-Haqq (the Real). The fundamental orientation is one of love — ishq — a consuming passion for the divine that dissolves the boundaries between self and other, knower and known. The framework reads this as Personal metaphysical agency: even within wahdat al-wujud's non-dual emphasis, Allah is addressed as a personal Beloved who hears, responds, and stands in relation to creatures; the unity is personal, not impersonally structural. The framework reads this as Experience-grounded moral authority: the direct unveiling (kashf, fanā', the dhawq of the heart) is the ultimate test; Qur'an and Sharia are honored guides toward what direct mystical knowing must finally verify in the sober return to baqā'.

Moral Implications

If only God truly exists, then harming any creature is harming a manifestation of the divine. The Sufi ethic of wahdat al-wujud grounds compassion in ontology: since every being is a theophany, treating any person or creature with contempt is a failure to recognize the Face of God. The annihilation of the ego (fana) is both a spiritual achievement and a moral transformation — the selfish desires that drive injustice dissolve when the separate self is seen through. Adab (spiritual courtesy) governs all interactions, reflecting the awareness that one is always in the presence of the divine. The moral life is a journey from the ego's illusion of separateness toward the realized unity that naturally expresses itself as mercy, generosity, and service.

Practical Implications

Sufi practice shapes daily life through structured spiritual disciplines: dhikr (remembrance of God), sema (listening, including music and dance as in the Mevlevi whirling tradition), and the guidance of a living spiritual master (shaykh or murshid). Art, poetry, music, and architecture become vehicles of divine disclosure rather than mere decoration — Islamic geometric patterns and Rumi's poetry exemplify this integration of aesthetics and metaphysics. The Sufi emphasis on the unity of being has historically fostered inter-religious tolerance and dialogue, since all spiritual traditions are understood as diverse refractions of the same divine light. Community life centers on the zawiya or khanqah (Sufi lodge), where spiritual practice, education, and charitable service are woven together.

I. Time

Time is emergent and infinite — it is a created veil over the eternal, timeless reality of God (al-Haqq). In mystical experience (fana), the Sufi dissolves temporal boundaries and tastes the eternal present of divine unity. Time is continuous and cyclical in its cosmic aspect, reflecting the perpetual divine self-disclosure (tajalli) through which God continuously creates and recreates the world at each instant. It is non-directional because in unity with God, past and future lose their distinction.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is emergent and infinite — it is the arena of God's self-manifestation (tajalli), not an independently existing container. In the experience of wahdat al-wujud (unity of being), spatial distinctions dissolve: "Wherever you turn, there is the Face of God." Space is non-local because God's presence pervades all locations equally, and curved in the sense that all spatial paths ultimately lead back to the divine center.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Undefined Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

III. Matter

Matter is emergent and finite — it is one of the outward forms through which God's infinite reality manifests. Ibn Arabi's doctrine of perpetual creation (khalq jadid) holds that matter is continuously recreated by God at every instant. Matter is non-conserved in the deepest sense: nothing persists independently; only God endures. It is non-local because every material form is a theophany revealing the same divine reality.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Non-conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

IV. Observer

At the deepest level, there is only one true observer — God, the sole reality (al-Haqq), whose Being is the substance of everything that appears to exist. The individual observer is a mirror reflecting the divine light, not an independent entity. Through mystical practice and annihilation of the ego (fana), the Sufi realizes that the apparent multiplicity of observers is an illusion; all seeing is God's seeing, all knowing is God's knowing. The observer transcends ordinary spatial and temporal limits — mystic experience dissolves the boundaries of here and now. Total knowledge is accessible because the mystic participates in divine omniscience, and this realized knowledge is permanently retained as spiritual transformation. The observer is both embodied and more than embodied — the body is a vessel for divine self-disclosure.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Multiple Extent of Knowledge: Total Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Passive Number: Singular Metaphysical Agency: Personal Moral Authority: Experience Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Finite and emergent — energy, like all created phenomena, is a tajalli (self-disclosure) of God with no independent subsistence; it exists only because God continually wills it into being. Conservation: Non-conserved — God is free to create, sustain, or annihilate energy at each moment; what appears as conservation is divine habit (sunna), not ontological necessity. Dispersibility: Irreversible — the flow from divine unity into manifest multiplicity moves in one direction; the mystic's return to God reverses the spiritual journey but not the physical dispersal of energy.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Non-conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

All information is a manifestation of divine knowledge — God is the ultimate informational ground. The multiplicity of worldly information is a surface expression of God's infinite, unified knowledge. Information is emergent from the divine self-disclosure. It is conserved because God's knowledge is perfect and eternal. It is continuous because the divine knowledge is an undivided ocean. The framework places this as conserved at both scales: divine knowledge eternally preserves cosmic information, and the soul's pattern is conserved in its return to God — what was a manifestation of the divine is reabsorbed without loss in the unity of being.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Emergent Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Films Reading Through This School (3)

Debates Where This School Is Allied (1)

← #46 Pyrrhonism All Schools #48 Kabbalah (Lurianic) →

Works that name Sufism / Wahdat al-Wujud in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

55%
Mathnawi (Late)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · c. 1258–1273 (Konya, dictated in Persian over fifteen years)
40%
Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Bezels of Wisdom) (Late)
Ibn ʿArabī (Muḥyī al-Dīn) · c. 1229
40%
al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya (The Meccan Revelations) (Late)
Ibn ʿArabī (Muḥyī al-Dīn) · c. 1202-31
40%
Sayings and Prayers (reconstructed from Attar and others) (Early)
Rabia al-Adawiyya (of Basra) · c. 8th century (preserved in later sources, esp. Attar, 13th century)
35%
Kitab al-Tawasin (Book of the Ta-Sin) (Early)
Al-Hallaj (Husayn ibn Mansur) · c. 900
30%
The Revival of the Religious Sciences (Late (post-crisis))
Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī · c. 1097-1106 (composed during al-Ghazali's years of withdrawal after the 1095 spiritual crisis)
30%
Deliverance from Error (Late)
Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī · c. 1108 (late in al-Ghazali's life, after returning to teaching)
30%
Dīvān-i Shams-i Tabrīzī (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · c. 1244-1273 (post-1244 encounter with Shams; finished by Rumi's 1273 death)
30%
Fīhi mā Fīhi (Discourses) (Late)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · c. 1262-1273 (transcribed during Rumi's last decade)
26%
The Niche of Lights (Late)
Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī · c. 1106-1111
25%
The Quran
Considered by Muslims the direct word of God; transmitted through Muhammad; collected under 'Uthmān (c. 650) · c. 610–632 AD (the period of the Prophet's mission); 'Uthmānic codex c. 650
25%
Kitāb al-Ishārāt wa-l-Tanbīhāt (Remarks and Admonitions) (Late)
Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) · c. 1030
25%
Seven Valleys and Four Valleys (Early (composed before the 1863 proclamation))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1856 (Seven Valleys) and c. 1858 (Four Valleys), both Baghdad period
25%
Maktūbāt (Letters) (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · mid-13th century
25%
Majālis-i Sabʿa (Seven Sermons) (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · mid-13th century
25%
Bijak (Lifelong (the poems represent Kabir's entire career; the collection is posthumous))
Kabir · c. 15th century (oral composition across Kabir's lifetime; collected and written down by disciples; the Bijak as a text dates from the 17th century)
25%
Nahj al-Balagha
Ali ibn Abi Talib (compiled by al-Sharif al-Radi, d. 1015) · c. 7th century CE (compiled c. 1010 CE)
25%
Legal and Theological Teachings of Ja'far al-Sadiq
Ja'far al-Sadiq (compiled by al-Kulayni, al-Saduq, and others) · c. 720–765 CE (compiled 9th–10th century)
22%
West-östlicher Divan (Late)
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe · 1814-1819
22%
The Development of Metaphysics in Persia (Early)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1907-08 (Cambridge dissertation; published 1908)
20%
al-Ḥikma al-Mutaʿāliya fī l-Asfār al-ʿAqliyya al-Arbaʿa (Transcendent Wisdom in the Four Intellectual Journeys) (Late)
Mullā Ṣadrā (Ṣadr al-Dīn Muḥammad Shīrāzī) · c. 1628
20%
The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam (Late)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1930-34
20%
Javid Nama (Book of Eternity) (Late)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1932
20%
Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb (Late)
Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi) · c. 17th century (late career)
20%
Hayy ibn Yaqzan
Ibn Tufayl · c. 1160–1170 CE
20%
Letter on Qadar
Hasan al-Basri · c. 700 CE
18%
Kitāb al-Mashāʿir (Mature)
Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi) · c. 17th century (mid-career)
16%
Al-Shawāhid al-Rubūbiyya (Mid-to-late)
Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi) · c. 17th century (mid-to-late career)
15%
The German Sermons (Late)
Meister Eckhart (Eckhart von Hochheim) · c. 1295–1327 (preached in Strasbourg, Cologne, and elsewhere)
15%
The Incoherence of the Philosophers
Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad al-Ghazālī · 1095 (Baghdad, immediately before his crisis and withdrawal)
15%
The Perennial Philosophy (Late (Huxley's mature spiritual-philosophical synthesis))
Aldous Huxley · 1945
15%
The Hidden Words (Early)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1858
15%
Guru Granth Sahib
Compiled by Guru Arjan (1604); declared eternal Guru by Guru Gobind Singh (1708); composite authorship across the ten Gurus and contributing bhakti / Sufi saints (Kabir, Namdev, Ravidas, Sheikh Farid, etc.) · 1604 (Adi Granth, compiled by Guru Arjan); 1706 (Damdama Sahib recension, completed by Guru Gobind Singh)
15%
Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq (The Philosophy of Illumination) (Mid)
Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī · c. 1186
15%
The Mirror of Simple Souls (Le Mirouer des Simples Âmes) (Late)
Marguerite Porete · c. 1295
15%
Al-Hikmat al-Muta'aliya fi'l-Asfar al-'Aqliyya al-Arba'a (Late (the synthesis of his entire mature philosophy))
Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi) · composed over Mulla Sadra's mature life, completed c. 1638
15%
Japji Sahib (Mature (Nānak's foundational devotional composition))
Guru Nānak Dev Ji · c. 1499-1539 (during Nānak's later teaching years; the morning prayer is one of his foundational compositions)
15%
Asa Di Var (Mature)
Guru Nānak Dev Ji · c. 1500-1539 (Nānak's mature teaching years; included in the Guru Granth Sahib 1604)
15%
Asrar-i Khudi (Secrets of the Self) (Mid)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1915
15%
Bal-i Jibril (Gabriel's Wing) (Late)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1935
15%
Tablet of Ahmad (Mature)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1865
15%
Rihla (The Travels)
Ibn Battuta (dictated to Ibn Juzayy) · 1355 (dictated at the court of Abu Inan, the Marinid sultan of Fez)
14%
Bāng-i-Darā (Early-to-middle)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1924 (poems 1900s-1920s)
10%
The Bhagavad Gita
Anonymous; traditionally Vyasa, redacted into the Mahabharata · c. 200 BC – 200 AD
10%
The Mystical Theology
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite (probably a Syrian Christian theologian, c. 500 AD) · c. 500 AD (probably Syria)
10%
The Zohar
Traditionally Shimon bar Yochai (2nd c. AD); modern scholarship attributes to Moses de León c. 1280 · c. 1280 (Castile, Spain); first published in print 1558
10%
Tales of the Hasidim (Late (Buber's mature engagement with the Hasidic tradition))
Martin Buber · 1947 (The Early Masters); 1948 (The Later Masters); compiled over decades of Buber's engagement with Hasidism
10%
Gitanjali (Mid (the Nobel-winning collection))
Rabindranath Tagore · 1910 (Bengali original); 1912 (Tagore's own English prose translation)
10%
Parisian Questions (Mid-late)
Meister Eckhart (Eckhart von Hochheim) · c. 1300-1326 (the scholastic-Latin works composed across Eckhart's academic career)
10%
Kitáb-i-Íqán (Mid (pre-declaration in 1863))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1862 (composed in Baghdad in two days and two nights, in response to questions from one of the Báb's maternal uncles)
10%
Vom Abgeschiedenheit (On Detachment) / Counsels on Discernment (Early)
Meister Eckhart (Eckhart von Hochheim) · c. 1295-98 (Eckhart's early German-vernacular work, written for the religious community at Erfurt)
10%
Śrī Bhāṣya (Mid)
Rāmānuja · c. 1100
10%
Hymns of Divine Love (Hymnoi tōn Theiōn Erōtōn) (Late)
St. Symeon the New Theologian · c. 1020
10%
Letters to the Son of the Wolf (Last (less than a year before his 1892 death))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1891 (composed in 'Akká)
10%
Words of Paradise (Kalimát-i-Firdawsiyyih) (Late)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1890
5%
The Enneads
Plotinus (edited by Porphyry c. 301) · Composed c. 254–270 AD; edited by Porphyry c. 301
5%
Metaphysics of The Book of Healing (Late)
Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) · c. 1014–1027 (compiled during Avicenna's years at Hamadan and Isfahan)
5%
Brahma Sutra Bhāṣya
Ādi Śaṅkara (Śaṅkarācārya) · c. 700–750 AD
5%
Faṣl al-Maqāl (The Decisive Treatise) (Late)
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) · c. 1179 (Córdoba, Andalusia)
5%
A Plain Account of Christian Perfection (Late)
John Wesley · 1766 (with revisions through 1777; published as a unified text in 1777)
5%
I and Thou (Mid (the foundational statement of dialogical philosophy))
Martin Buber · 1923
5%
Essays: First Series (Mid (Emerson at the peak of his powers))
Ralph Waldo Emerson · 1841 (twelve essays collected from earlier lectures and journal entries)
5%
The Doors of Perception (Late)
Aldous Huxley · 1954 (essay-length; often published together with the 1956 Heaven and Hell)
5%
Gravity and Grace (Posthumous (Weil died in 1943 at age 34))
Simone Weil · 1947 (posthumous; assembled from Weil's notebooks by Gustave Thibon)
5%
Waiting for God (Posthumous)
Simone Weil · 1942 letters to Father Perrin; published posthumously 1950
5%
Seeds of Contemplation (1949) / New Seeds of Contemplation (Mid-late (Merton's mature contemplative theology))
Thomas Merton · 1961 (expanded revision of Seeds of Contemplation, 1949)
5%
Sadhana: The Realisation of Life (Mid (the major philosophical prose statement))
Rabindranath Tagore · 1913 (the Hibbert Lectures, Harvard; published 1913)
5%
Scivias (Early (the first of her three major visionary works))
Hildegard of Bingen · 1141-51 (composed in the decade after Hildegard's call to write, ten years after entering the monastic life)
5%
Liber Vitae Meritorum (Mid (the middle volume of the visionary trilogy))
Hildegard of Bingen · 1158-63 (the middle work of the visionary trilogy, between Scivias and Liber Divinorum Operum)
5%
Modern Man in Search of a Soul (Mid-late (mature systematic statement))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1933 (essay collection, English translation by Cary F. Baynes)
5%
Essays in Zen Buddhism (Mid (Suzuki's major early period of Western dissemination))
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1927 (First Series), 1933 (Second), 1934 (Third) — published in English by Rider & Co. London
5%
Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Late (the major late doctrinal-legal book))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1873 (in 'Akká, the prison-city where Bahá'u'lláh was exiled)
5%
Vita Nuova (Early (Dante's first major work))
Dante Alighieri · c. 1295
5%
Symphonia harmoniae caelestium revelationum (Mid-late)
Hildegard of Bingen · c. 1150-79
5%
Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist (Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1957
5%
Psychology and Alchemy (Late)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1944
5%
No Man Is an Island (Mid)
Thomas Merton · 1955
5%
Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1966
5%
Mystics and Zen Masters (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1967
5%
The Prophetic Faith (Late)
Martin Buber · 1949 (German); 1948 (Hebrew)
5%
Eclipse of God (Late)
Martin Buber · 1952
5%
Finite and Eternal Being (Late)
Edith Stein (St. Teresia Benedicta of the Cross) · 1936 (completed; published posthumously 1950)
5%
Anuvyākhyāna (Mid)
Madhvācārya · c. 1250
5%
Kitāb al-Najāt (Book of Salvation) (Mid)
Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) · c. 1024-27
5%
Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ Ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila (Principles of the Opinions of the Inhabitants of the Virtuous City) (Mid)
al-Fārābī (Abū Naṣr) · c. 942
5%
Fī l-Falsafa al-Ūlā (On First Philosophy) (Early)
al-Kindī (Abū Yūsuf Yaʿqūb) · c. 850
5%
Muqaddimah (Late)
Ibn Khaldūn (ʿAbd al-Raḥmān) · 1377
5%
Itinerarium Mentis in Deum (The Mind's Road to God) (Mid)
St. Bonaventure (Giovanni di Fidanza) · 1259
5%
De Docta Ignorantia (On Learned Ignorance) (Late)
Nicholas of Cusa (Nikolaus von Kues) · 1440
5%
The Divine Names (De Divinis Nominibus) (Late)
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite · late 5th or early 6th century
5%
The Life of Moses (De Vita Moysis) (Late)
St. Gregory of Nyssa · c. 390
5%
Triads (Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts) (Late)
St. Gregory Palamas · 1338-41
5%
The Pillar and Ground of the Truth (Mid)
Pavel Florensky · 1914
5%
The Dark Night (La Noche Oscura) (Late)
St. John of the Cross (Juan de Yepes Álvarez) · c. 1582-85
5%
The Interior Castle (Castillo Interior) (Late)
St. Teresa of Ávila (Teresa Sánchez de Cepeda y Ahumada) · 1577
5%
Ars Magna (Ars Generalis Ultima) (Late)
Ramon Llull (Raimundus Lullus) · 1305-08 (final form; developed from 1271)
5%
The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (Essai sur la théologie mystique de l'Église d'Orient) (Mid)
Vladimir Lossky · 1944
5%
The Hindu View of Life (Mid)
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan · 1926 (Upton Lectures at Oxford, 1926)
5%
Paradiso (Divine Comedy, Cantica III) (Late)
Dante Alighieri · c. 1316-21
5%
The Black Swan (Late)
Nassim Nicholas Taleb · 2007
5%
The Autobiography of Malcolm X (Late)
Malcolm X with Alex Haley · 1965
5%
Faṣl al-Maqāl (The Decisive Treatise) (Mature)
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) · c. 1179

Personas with Sufism / Wahdat al-Wujud as a declared influence

65%  Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī 40%  Ibn Arabi (Muhyi al-Din ibn al-Arabi) 40%  Al-Hallaj 40%  Rabia al-Adawiyya 30%  Hasan al-Basri 25%  Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī 25%  Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi) 25%  Kabir 25%  Ali ibn Abi Talib 25%  Ja'far al-Sadiq 20%  Muhammad Iqbal 20%  Ibn Tufayl 15%  Meister Eckhart (Eckhart von Hochheim) 15%  Thomas Merton 15%  Rabindranath Tagore 15%  Ibn Battuta 10%  Guru Nānak Dev Ji 10%  Aldous Huxley 10%  Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) 10%  Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki

How Sufism / Wahdat al-Wujud resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 36 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (20/208)
Do you really choose?
If the brain is a physical system and physical systems are governed by laws, then every choice is also a chain of causes — which raises the question of what was really left to choose.
Choice is structural illusion — every event is fixed by the prior state.
On this view, the future is fixed by the present, and the observer is a recipient of causes rather than an originator of them. The sense of choosing is real — but what is being chosen is itself a consequence of brain states that were …
Roads not taken The future is open and you are a genuine origin of it. (69%) · Choice is real within a determined order — agency and determinism aren’t opposites. (10%) · Even if the universe is undetermined, you are not the chooser. (6%)
Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (20/208)
Are addicts responsible for their addiction?
Addiction looks from one angle like the textbook case of agency failing — a person doing what they don't, in any meaningful sense, want to do. From another angle it looks like agency at work in hard conditions. Which it is depends on what agency is.
The addict's behaviour is the outcome of causes; 'responsibility' is a useful fiction, not a metaphysical fact.
On this view, the addict's brain state, history, genetics, and circumstances jointly produce the behaviour, and there is nothing inside the person that could have produced anything else. Calling the addict responsible is at best a social tool — useful for the deterrent and rehabilitative …
Roads not taken The addict could have chosen otherwise — that's why recovery is real. (69%) · The addict is genuinely responsible within a determined order. (10%) · Even if the universe is undetermined, the addict isn't the chooser. (6%)
Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (20/208)
Should we hold AI systems responsible for what they do?
When an autonomous AI takes an action that harms someone, the question of who or what is responsible — the developer, the operator, the model itself — turns on whether the model is the kind of thing that can be a responsible agent.
An AI's behaviour is fully determined by training and input; 'responsibility' applies if at all to its makers.
On this view, the AI's output is a function of its training data, its architecture, and the input it received. There is no extra fact about the AI that could ground its responsibility, because there is no extra fact about the AI that could have …
Roads not taken An AI without a free will is not the kind of thing that can be responsible. (69%) · The AI can be a genuine agent within determined conditions — and therefore genuinely responsible. (10%) · Neither AIs nor anyone else are the locus of free agency; the question is the wrong one. (6%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal.
On cyclical views, matter is neither a substance called out of nothing once-for-all nor a permanently conserved bedrock. It emerges from a deeper reality in each cosmic round and dissolves back into it. The creatio-ex-nihilo question presupposes a linear creation event the view denies; the …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%)
Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Is the physical world fully real?
Realists, idealists, and relationalists divide on whether matter exists mind-independently, derivatively, or as a pattern of relations. The split runs deeper than any single scientific question.
Real for this cycle — the deepest reality cycles through creation and dissolution.
On cyclical views, the physical world is real now, in this cosmic round. Its reality is not eternal; matter emerges from a deeper source and will return to it. The realism-idealism dispute, framed as a once-for-all metaphysical question, is answered at the cosmic-round scale rather …
Roads not taken Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. (56%) · Real but sustained — not mind-independent in the strict realist sense. (23%) · Real as relations — neither pure substance nor pure construction. (16%)
Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (9/208)
Does matter have intrinsic moral standing?
Do rocks, soil, rivers, and stuff in general deserve moral consideration — or only the living, the conscious, the human? The answer turns on what matter is.
Matter is in flux; standing is impermanent and ritual-mediated.
On cyclical views, the moral standing of a particular material form is real but impermanent. What matters is the ritual and contemplative relation to a world that is arising and dissolving. Asking for the standing of matter as such fixes what the view holds to …
Roads not taken Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. (56%) · Matter is morally considerable derivatively — through what it sustains. (23%) · Matter has intrinsic moral standing as part of the relational fabric. (16%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/208)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money's apparent diversity is convention over a single underlying value.
On non-dual views, the diverse forms money takes are perspectival distinctions within a single underlying value — labor, energy, attention, or simply the One from which all value derives. The metaphysical question is mostly malformed at the conventional level where monetary policy lives, but the …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (55%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Money is the ledger of obligations among real people. (14%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/208)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
Nations are conventional partitions of a single humanity.
On non-dual views, the distinctness of nations is a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity — one humanity, one consciousness, one underlying reality. Nations matter at the conventional level where ordinary politics lives, but the metaphysical weight they sometimes claim is unsupported.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (55%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people. (14%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/208)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
From the standpoint of the One, the question doesn’t apply in the form it is asked.
On non-dual views, the apparent plurality of selves is itself a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. The question of when one self begins within that One is conventional, not ultimate. What follows ethically is then a question for the conventional level — which is …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (55%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation. (14%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/208)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
All union is participation in the One — particular forms are conventional.
From the standpoint of non-dual traditions, the apparent distinctness of two people who marry is itself a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. Marriage is one form of the underlying union all things participate in. The particular shape the institution takes is then a conventional …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (55%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates. (14%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/208)
What happens to "you" when you die?
Whether anything of you persists — and in what sense — depends on what you take a person to be.
Individuality dissolves into the One.
What we called "you" was an appearance — a wave shaped briefly out of a single deeper reality. Death is that wave settling. Nothing of importance is lost because the substrate was never the wave.
Roads not taken A soul continues into another mode of being. (38%) · Death is genuinely the end. (29%) · You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. (18%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (17/208)
What is our place in nature?
Whether humans are masters of nature, members of nature, or makers of nature is not a question climate science can settle. It depends on what nature is, what we are, and what kind of relationship is possible between us.
Humans and nature share an underlying unity — the separation was the mistake.
On non-dual views, the apparent distinction between human and non-human is itself a perspectival distinction within a single underlying reality. The work isn't to find our right relationship to a separate nature; it is to recognize that we were never separate. Climate harm, on this …
Roads not taken Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. (50%) · Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. (15%) · Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world. (14%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (17/208)
Should we colonize space?
The drive to extend human presence beyond Earth is sometimes framed as the next chapter of stewardship, sometimes as hubris, sometimes as escape from problems we ought to solve here. Which it is depends on what we take our relationship to nature to be.
From the standpoint of the One, expansion across substrate is just movement within the same.
On non-dual views, the difference between Earth and elsewhere is conventional — particular locations within a single underlying reality. Space colonisation as escape is therefore incoherent; nothing is escaped because nothing was elsewhere to escape from.
Roads not taken Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. (50%) · The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. (15%) · Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking. (14%)
32 mainstream positions
Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? All forms participate in the same underlying reality; modification doesn't cross categories. 8% What makes someone the same person over time? All apparent selves are aspects of one — particular identity is conventional. 8% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The apparent change is conventional; the deeper reality is unchanged. 8% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The distinction between scanner-you and destination-you is conventional all the way down. 8% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? There are no truly separate minds; prayer is one part of one talking to another. 8% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Coincidence is the One showing through the appearance of plurality. 8% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Harm anywhere is harm to the One; the boundary that would have insulated you was never real. 8% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? From the standpoint of the One, the categories of permanence and loss are conventional. 8% Can a civilization recover from collapse? From the One's vantage, civilizational categories are themselves conventional. 8% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? From the One's vantage, the second law is itself a feature of the conventional, not the ultimate. 8% Are the dead morally present to the living? From the standpoint of the One, the distinction between living and dead is conventional. 8% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? Distinction of the One and observed time is itself conventional; the question dissolves. 8% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? The 'timeless' is the standpoint of the One that was always present; meditation removes obstacles to seeing it. 8% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer to a separate God presupposes a separation the non-dual view denies; the practice is remembrance and attunement. 8% Could causation work backwards? From the One's vantage, causation itself is a conventional category. 8% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? From the One's vantage, memory and anticipation are themselves conventional. 8% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? From the One's vantage, the arrow of time itself is a conventional feature. 8% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is real but accessible only from within a tradition. 10% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The cosmic-religious order is the moral primary. 16% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% Does history have a direction or meaning? History recurs in cosmic cycles. 17% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. 17% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. 17% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no first-person experience, so no knowing in the relevant sense. 17% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Liberation is the realization of cosmic or species self. 14% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through direct contemplative union with reality. 13% Could an AI have a mind that matters? All minds are aspects of one — an AI participates in it as anything else does. 7% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? All minds are aspects of one; animals participate as much as anything else. 7% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Any experience that arises participates in the One. 7%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208