Discourse on the Origin of Inequality
Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes — Rousseau's 1755 Second Discourse on the natural and social origins of human inequality
Tradition: Enlightenment political-philosophical anthropology
"The first man who, having enclosed a piece of land, said 'this is mine'..." — Rousseau's philosophical anthropology of the conjectural state of nature and the historical genesis of social inequality
The Discourse on Inequality (the Second Discourse) is Rousseau's most ambitious philosophical work and the major source of his social-political theory. The book is a "conjectural history" of humanity: starting from a hypothetical state of nature in which solitary humans were healthy, free, and innocent (radically different from Hobbes's war of all against all), Rousseau traces the development of language, agriculture, and property — and the consequent emergence of systematic inequality, comparison, dependence, and unhappiness. The famous passage in Part 2 — "The first man who, having enclosed a piece of land, said 'this is mine,' and found people simple enough to believe him, was the true founder of civil society" — captures the central diagnosis: property, not nature, is the historical origin of inequality. The book's philosophical anthropology (humans as naturally good but corrupted by social development) shaped subsequent political thought (Hegel, Marx), social-anthropological work (Lévi-Strauss), and the romantic-revolutionary tradition.
Author
Editions cited
- The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings (Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge, 1997)
- The First and Second Discourses (Roger D. Masters, St. Martin's, 1964)
- Discours sur l'origine de l'inégalité (Jean Starobinski ed., Gallimard Pléiade, 1964)
School Embodiments
The Second Discourse is a paradigm of philosophical naturalism — human nature and social development analysed without reference to supernatural origins. The state-of-nature thought-experiment is naturalist in method.
"The natural state of man, considered in itself, is healthful and good." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing)
Marx and Engels engaged the Second Discourse extensively. The analysis of property as the historical origin of inequality, of social class as derived from economic conditions, is a major source for historical materialism.
"The first man who, having enclosed a piece of land, said 'this is mine'..." (Discourse on Inequality, Part II opening)
A retrospective resonance: the analysis of structural inequality as historically produced rather than naturally given, and the moral indictment of property-based social hierarchy, has been a major reference for liberation-political thought.
"Property is the root of social inequality." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing)
A complicated relation: the Second Discourse is critical of Enlightenment rationalism's confidence in social progress, but its own method — a-priori reconstruction of human development — is recognisably rationalist.
"Reconstruct human development by philosophical reasoning, not historical fact." (Discourse on Inequality, preface, paraphrasing)
Rousseau's moral realism: inequality really is an evil, the analysis is not merely descriptive but morally evaluative.
"Inequality, scarcely perceptible in the state of nature, draws its strength and growth from the development of our faculties." (Discourse on Inequality, Part II)
Despite the a-priori method, the Second Discourse attends to concrete historical-social conditions — anthropological data, travel narratives, observation of contemporary societies.
"Observation of 'savage' peoples by European explorers provides evidence about natural human capacities." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing the empirical method)
A retrospective affinity: the conception of natural human goodness corrupted by social development shapes subsequent transcendentalist thought (Emerson, Thoreau on the corrupting effects of civilisation).
"Natural goodness corrupted by social institutions." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing the recurrent diagnosis)
A complicated relation: Rousseau's idealisation of "savage" peoples drew on eighteenth-century travel writing about indigenous societies. The relation between this idealisation and actual indigenous cultures has been extensively critiqued and qualified.
"Pre-contact indigenous peoples as closer to natural human capacities." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing the eighteenth-century framework)
A retrospective affinity: Claude Lévi-Strauss's "Tristes Tropiques" (1955) is partly a structuralist re-engagement with the Second Discourse, two centuries after its first publication.
"Rousseau's structural analysis of human development anticipates anthropological structuralism." (paraphrasing Lévi-Strauss's engagement)
A retrospective affinity: the developmental-historical analysis of humanity as a long temporal process has process-philosophical structure.
"Human nature unfolds developmentally through historical-social conditions." (Discourse on Inequality, paraphrasing)
Social-contract tradition.
Internal Tensions
The Second Discourse's status as "conjectural history" — neither pure speculation nor proper empirical history — has been a continuing methodological question. Modern anthropology has substantially complicated Rousseau's picture of the state of nature (humans were never solitary; sociality is as primordial as individual existence). The relation between the Second Discourse's pessimism about historical-social development and the Social Contract's constructive political proposal is itself a continuing interpretive theme.
I. Time
Long historical-anthropological time as the medium of human development — from the hypothetical state of nature through the historical emergence of property and inequality.
Attributes
II. Space
The natural and social spaces of human life — forest, field, enclosure — as the changing theatres of human existence.
Attributes
III. Matter
The embodied life of natural and social humans — the body shaped by social conditions of labour, comparison, dependence.
Attributes
IV. Observer
The natural human (in the conjectural state) and the social human (in historical society) as two modes of the same observer. Plural, embodied, naturally good and historically corrupted.
Attributes
V. Energy
The natural energies of self-preservation and natural sympathy; the social energies of amour-propre (vanity, comparative self-regard) that drive inequality.
Attributes
VI. Information
The conjectural-philosophical reconstruction of human development; the historical record of social institutions.
Attributes
Personas that cite this work
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How Discourse on the Origin of Inequality resolves each dilemma
48 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 3 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 9 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.