School #41

Confucianism

Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi

Confucianism holds that moral cultivation is both the path to personal virtue and the foundation of social and political order. The 'Analects' ('Lunyu'), compiled by Confucius's (Kong Qiu, 551-479 BCE) disciples, presents his teachings through dialogue: ren (benevolence, humaneness) is the supreme virtue — "Do not impose on others what you do not wish for yourself" (15.24) — and it is cultivated through li (ritual propriety), learning, and the rectification of names. Mencius (Mengzi, 4th century BCE), in the book bearing his name, argued that human nature is innately good: the "four sprouts" of compassion, shame, deference, and moral judgment are present in every person and need only cultivation, as a farmer tends seedlings. Xunzi (3rd century BCE) countered that human nature is inclined toward disorder and selfishness, and that goodness is achieved only through rigorous education, ritual practice, and the civilizing force of culture — nature must be reformed by artifice. Together, these thinkers established a tradition in which the self is realized through proper relationships, Heaven (Tian) ordains a moral order, and history moves, however haltingly, toward virtue and harmony.

Worldview

The Confucian experiences reality as a moral field in which every relationship carries obligations and every action either advances or diminishes the harmony of the human world. To hold this ontology is to see oneself as embedded in a web of relationships — parent and child, ruler and subject, teacher and student, friend and friend — each defining who one is and what one owes. The fundamental orientation is toward ren (benevolence, humaneness): the cultivation of one's character through study, ritual practice, and the emulation of sages. Reality feels orderly and purposeful, because Heaven (Tian) underwrites a moral cosmos in which virtue is both possible and imperative. The world is not indifferent but morally responsive to human effort. The framework classifies this as Cosmic-ordering metaphysical agency: Tian (Heaven) functions in classical Confucianism more as an impersonal moral-ordering principle than as a personal deity, even though ritual address treats it with reverence. The framework reads this as Tradition-grounded moral authority: the Five Classics, the example of the Sage-Kings, and the lived ritual tradition (li) handed down through teachers together constitute the standard; the junzi is formed within this canonical-ritual lineage, not by private reason or solitary experience.

Moral Implications

Confucian ethics is grounded in role-based obligation and the cultivation of virtue through practice. The moral life begins with self-cultivation (xiu shen) and radiates outward to family, community, and state — the concentric circles of moral responsibility described in the Great Learning. Filial piety (xiao) is the root of virtue, because learning to honor and serve one's parents is the foundation for all other moral relations. Justice is relational rather than abstract: what is right depends on one's position within the web of relationships and the specific obligations that position entails. The rectification of names demands that moral language be precise and that titles correspond to actual conduct.

Practical Implications

Confucianism shapes governance, education, and family life around the principle that moral cultivation is the foundation of social order. Education is not merely the acquisition of skills but the formation of character through study of the classics, ritual practice, and the mentorship of virtuous teachers. Political authority is legitimate only when rulers govern by moral example rather than force, and meritocratic civil service examinations historically institutionalized this ideal. Economic policy must ensure material sufficiency for all, since Mencius argued that moral cultivation is impossible when people lack basic necessities. Ritual propriety (li) structures daily interactions, embedding ethical awareness in the rhythms of ordinary life.

I. Time

Time is relational and infinite — it is the medium of ongoing moral cultivation, social harmony, and the transmission of tradition. Time is continuous, cyclical, and uni-directional within the life of the individual: one cultivates virtue from youth to old age. The Confucian reverences the past (the sages, the classics) as a moral resource and guide for the present.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Relational Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Cyclical Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is relational and infinite — it is the social and natural environment in which the web of human relationships unfolds. Space is flat, local, and three-dimensional as experienced in daily life. The Confucian emphasis on ritual propriety (li) gives particular places (the home, the court, the ancestral hall) moral significance that exceeds their physical dimensions.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter is substantival and finite — the Confucian takes the material world as real and morally significant. Material conditions (food, shelter, livelihood) are prerequisites for moral cultivation; Mencius insisted that the people must have material security before they can practice virtue. Matter is conserved and local: the physical world is the arena of ethical action.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

The observer is an embodied, socially embedded person — situated in a particular time, place, and web of relationships (ruler-subject, parent-child, elder-younger) that define one's duties and identity. Knowledge is immediate and practical: it begins with self-cultivation and extends outward through study, ritual, and the example of sages and ancestors. Through disciplined learning and moral practice, wisdom accumulates over a lifetime and across generations, preserved in the classical texts and living traditions. The observer is active — self-cultivation (xiu shen) is a lifelong moral project, not a passive reception of truth. Multiple observers are bound together in a web of mutual obligation; the self is never solitary but always relational.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Immediate Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Cosmic-ordering Moral Authority: Tradition Theological Method: Pragmatic-civic

V. Energy

Energy is substantival and finite — vital energy (qi) animates the body and sustains moral effort. Conservation holds in the sense that qi must be cultivated and conserved through proper ritual, diet, and moral practice. Dispersibility is irreversible: neglecting moral cultivation depletes one's vital energy.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Information is social and relational — encoded in rites (li), relationships, and textual tradition. Knowledge is inseparable from its moral and social context. Information is relational because it exists within the web of human relationships and duties. It is conserved because the Confucian tradition places supreme value on preserving and transmitting knowledge across generations. It is continuous because social harmony is a seamless, ongoing process. The framework distinguishes scales: information is conserved at the cosmic scale because Tian's pattern and the rites preserve the moral order across generations, but non-conserved at the personal-identity scale — the individual is honored through the ancestral line and lives on in the family and tradition rather than as a persisting personal soul.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Experiments This School Responds To (4)

Films Reading Through This School (2)

Debates Where This School Is Allied (5)

← #40 Taoism All Schools #42 Jainism / Anekantavada →

Works that name Confucianism in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

75%
The Analects
Compiled by Confucius's disciples and their disciples · Compiled c. 5th–3rd century BC; core sayings reflect Confucius (551–479 BC)
65%
Mencius
Meng Ke (Mencius); compiled by his disciples · c. late 4th century BC (compiled shortly after his death c. 289 BC)
55%
Speeches in the Book of Documents (Shangshu)
Duke of Zhou (attributed) · c. 1042 BCE (events); written form c. 10th–5th century BCE
50%
Xunzi
Xun Kuang (Xunzi) · c. 280–230 BC
45%
Memorial on the Bone of the Buddha
Han Yu · 819 CE
45%
Speeches in the Shangshu (Call of Shao and others)
Duke of Shao (attributed) · c. 11th century BCE (events); written form c. 10th–5th century BCE
40%
The Great Learning and Doctrine of the Mean
Confucius (Kongzi) · Originally chapters of the Book of Rites (Li Ji, c. 1st c. BC); elevated to the Four Books by Zhu Xi (1130-1200) in the Song dynasty
40%
Collected Commentaries on the Four Books (Sishu Jizhu) (Late)
Zhu Xi · c. 1177–1190 (revised throughout his life)
35%
Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation (Late)
Tu Weiming · 1985
35%
Instructions for Practical Living
Wang Yangming (Wang Shouren) · c. 1518 (compiled by students; expanded editions to 1572)
35%
Xunzi
Xunzi (Xun Kuang) · c. 3rd century BCE
30%
Inquiry on the Great Learning (Daxue Wen) (Late)
Wang Yangming · 1527
30%
Zhuzi Yulei (Conversations of Master Zhu, Arranged Topically) (Late)
Zhu Xi (Chu Hsi); compiled by Li Jingde · Conversations 1170-1200; compiled 1270
30%
Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy (Zhi de zhijue yu Zhongguo zhexue) (Late)
Mou Zongsan · 1971
30%
Eastern and Western Cultures and Their Philosophies (Dongxi wenhua ji qi zhexue) (Early)
Liang Shuming · 1921
30%
The Book of Songs (Shijing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Confucius as editor) · c. 1000-600 BCE (poems); c. 6th-5th c. BCE (compiled)
30%
The Book of Documents (Shujing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Confucius as editor) · composed in stages c. 1100-600 BCE; compiled c. 6th-5th c. BCE; portions are later forgeries detected in Qing-period scholarship
30%
The Book of Rites (Liji) (Mid)
Anonymous (composed by various early Confucian writers) · Han dynasty compilation (c. 1st c. BCE) of pre-Qin and Han materials
30%
The Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu) (Early)
Confucius (traditionally attributed) · 5th c. BCE (traditional); chronicling events 722-481 BCE
30%
Seventeen-Article Constitution
Prince Shotoku · 604 CE (traditional date)
25%
I Ching
Anonymous / composite (traditional attribution to King Wen and Confucius; the Ten Wings to the Confucian school) · c. 9th–8th c. BC (core hexagrams); c. 4th c. BC (Ten Wings); standard form c. 200 BC
25%
A Short History of Chinese Philosophy (Mid)
Fung Yu-lan (Feng Youlan) · 1948
25%
The Book of Changes (Yi Jing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally Fu Xi for hexagrams; King Wen and Duke of Zhou for line-statements; Confucius for the Ten Wings commentaries) · Hexagrams: legendary, pre-1000 BCE; line-statements: c. 1000-750 BCE; Ten Wings commentaries: c. 500-100 BCE
25%
I Ching (Book of Changes, attributed arrangement)
King Wen of Zhou (traditional attribution) · c. 1050–800 BCE (core hexagram and judgment layers; commentaries later)
20%
The Importance of Living (Mid)
Lin Yutang · 1937
15%
The Art of War (Early)
Sun Tzu (Sunzi) · 5th c. BCE (Warring States era)
12%
Philosophies and Cultures (Late)
Frederick Copleston · 1980
10%
Wild Ivy (Itsumadegusa) (Late)
Hakuin Ekaku · 1765-66
10%
Climate and Culture (Fūdo: ningengakuteki kōsatsu) (Mid)
Watsuji Tetsurō · 1935
10%
Kokoro (Late)
Natsume Sōseki · 1914 (serialized Asahi Shimbun)
10%
Han Feizi
Han Feizi · c. 240–233 BCE
10%
Inquiry into the Origin of Humanity
Zongmi · c. 830s CE
5%
Zhuangzi
Zhuangzi (Zhuang Zhou) · c. 4th-3rd c. BC (Inner Chapters by Zhuang Zhou; Outer and Miscellaneous Chapters by later hands)
5%
Shōbōgenzō (Late)
Dōgen Zenji · 1231-1253 (95 fascicles)
5%
Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind (Late)
Shunryu Suzuki (Suzuki-rōshi) · 1970
5%
Daodejing (Early)
Laozi (trad. attrib.) · 4th c. BCE (composite text; trad. attrib. Laozi 6th c.)
5%
Mozi (Early)
Mozi (and Mohist school) · 5th-4th c. BCE (Warring States era)

Personas with Confucianism as a declared influence

70%  Confucius (Kongzi) 60%  Duke of Zhou (Zhou Gong) 50%  Xunzi 45%  Han Yu 40%  Zhu Xi 40%  Duke of Shao 35%  Wang Yangming 35%  Mencius (Mengzi) 30%  Prince Shotoku 30%  King Wen of Zhou 15%  Mozi 10%  Laozi (Lao Tzu) 10%  Motoori Norinaga 10%  Han Feizi 10%  Zongmi -25%  Lu Xun

How Confucianism resolves each dilemma

56 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 25 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 1 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
How much weight do future people deserve?
If a billion people will exist in the 25th century, do their interests count for as much as the interests of a billion people alive now? The answer turns on what kind of reality the future has.
Past, present, and future are bound in cycles — duties span generations as a matter of course.
On these views, time is not a one-way arrow but a structure of return: cosmic cycles, karmic cycles, the seasons, the succession of generations. To act now is always also to act for the ancestors who shaped your inheritance and for the descendants who will …
Roads not taken Future people are as real as you are — and their interests count for as much. (47%) · Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. (31%) · The future branches — what we owe depends on which branch we create. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Is regret rational?
If the past is fixed and unchangeable, what kind of mental act is regret? An error, a duty, a lesson, a perspective on a moment that is still in some sense present?
The past is part of a cycle one keeps returning to; regret is one of the gates of the cycle.
On cyclical views, the past is not a fixed thing behind you — it is part of the ongoing structure of return: karmic cycles, cosmic cycles, the cycle of seasons and generations. Regret, on these views, is less about an unchangeable past and more about …
Roads not taken The past is as real as the present; regret is a real attitude toward a real thing. (47%) · The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. (31%) · Other branches exist; regret tracks roads not taken that are nonetheless real. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them?
A species that no longer exists cannot be helped, cannot be consulted, cannot benefit. Whether anything is owed to it anyway turns on what kind of reality past beings have.
Past beings are part of the cycle; we owe them what we owe ancestors.
On cyclical views, the relationship to past beings — ancestors, lineages, predecessors — is structurally present, because past and future are part of the same ongoing structure of return. Extinct species are not categorically different from extinct human ancestors or non-yet-born descendants: all are part …
Roads not taken Extinct species are as real as we are; they have standing. (47%) · Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. (31%) · Extinction is path-dependent; the species exists in branches we didn't take. (2%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money is the ledger of obligations among real people.
On relational views, money is not a substance you have; it is a record of who owes whom what. Debts and credits are real because the relations they track are real — to kin, to community, to ancestors, to land. Money is the form this …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (55%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people.
On relational views, the nation is the relational fabric — extended kinship, ancestral inheritance, shared ecology, communal practice — that hosts a people across generations. Borders matter less than belonging; lineage and land carry the weight that political structures only ratify.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (55%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · “Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition.
On relational views, identity is not a property a person has alone; it is constituted by the web of recognition the person sits in. What makes someone a man or a woman in any thick sense is the relations of kinship, community, ritual, and recognition …
Roads not taken Sex is a real biological kind with given content. (55%) · Gender is constructed; what counts as male or female reflects practice. (16%) · “Male” and “female” are family-resemblance terms — no single essence. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
Should we edit the human germline?
Whether human nature is a given biological kind, a constructed category, a relational achievement, a family-resemblance cluster, or a conventional distinction within deeper unity is the ontological question the policy debate over heritable gene editing is mostly about.
Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric.
On relational views, what makes someone a person is the web of kinship, ancestry, and community they sit in — not a property the body carries alone. Heritable editing intervenes in exactly this fabric: the lineage that ancestors handed on, the descent that descendants will …
Roads not taken Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. (55%) · The categories we count as 'human' are emergent from practice; germline editing is a practice-revision like any other. (16%) · 'Human nature' is a cluster term without a single essence; the editing question is empirical, not metaphysical. (8%)
Distinctive · only 16% of schools agree (33/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance.
On this view, matter is not a stuff but a patterning — the standing relations among things, ancestors, processes, and places. The creatio-ex-nihilo question doesn't quite arise, because the ontology has no slot for a free-standing substance to be created or eternal. What persists is …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 4% of schools agree (8/208)
What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize?
Religious traditions differ not only in what they believe, but in how authority is structured — and what counts as the right kind of argument.
Civic ritual or pragmatic moral function is the authority.
Religion's authority is its public-civic function, not its metaphysical claims.
Roads not taken The category does not apply — the school is non-religious. (42%) · Direct experiential union is the authority. (16%) · Institutional teaching tradition is the authority. (13%)
Distinctive · only 10% of schools agree (21/208)
Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed?
What kind of thing is a true claim, and how does it relate to the standpoint from which it is made?
Truth is real but accessible only from within a tradition.
Truth is not constructed but tradition-constituted; you have to be inside the tradition to see it.
Roads not taken Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. (66%) · Truth is real but always known from a perspective. (16%) · What counts as truth is constituted by language, practice, history, power. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation.
On relational views, person was never the name of a thing that exists on its own — it is the name of a node in a web of recognition, obligation, kinship, and ecology. The question of when a being becomes a person is the question …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (55%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · The question presupposes a fact of the matter that isn’t there. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates.
On relational views, marriage is not a thing in itself but a node in a web — a configuration of obligations to children, extended kin, ancestors, ecology, and community. Its definition is what the network of relations is, and any attempt to specify it apart …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (55%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Marriage” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is our place in nature?
Whether humans are masters of nature, members of nature, or makers of nature is not a question climate science can settle. It depends on what nature is, what we are, and what kind of relationship is possible between us.
Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world.
On these views, humans were never outside nature, and the question of our 'place in' it is the question of how to live within the relations that already constitute us. Plants, animals, rivers, ancestors, descendants are not resources or stage scenery; they are kin and …
Roads not taken Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. (50%) · Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. (15%) · Subject to a real natural order we did not make. (12%)
31 mainstream positions
Should we colonize space? Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking. 14% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Editing the genome cuts into the relational fabric; we should be very slow. 14% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The cosmic-religious order is the moral primary. 16% What happens to "you" when you die? You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. 18% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. 18% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. 18% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. 18% Could causation work backwards? Time is structured as return; 'forward' and 'backward' are local features of the cycle. 18% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? Memory and anticipation are phases of a cycle that visits both directions. 18% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? Within a cycle there is a direction; across the cycle there isn't. 18% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Moral obligation tracks the relations one is in; distance does matter, structurally. 50% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 38% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 38% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 37% Does history have a direction or meaning? History is not where the deepest truth lives. 36% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 34% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 34% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 34% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 30% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 30% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 30% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 30% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 30% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 30% Could an AI have a mind that matters? An AI’s standing is constituted by the relations it enters. 14% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? An animal's standing is constituted by its place in the relational fabric. 11% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? The organoid's standing is constituted by the relations of care around its production. 11% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through practical engagement; what works counts as known. 9%
1 unaligned
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208