Works › Between Man and Man
Work #1631 · Middle-to-late period

Between Man and Man

Buber's 1947 'Zwischen Mensch und Mensch' — essays on dialogue, education, and the question of man

Martin Buber · 1929-1938 essays; 1947 publication · German · Philosophical essay collection

Tradition: Jewish dialogical philosophy / philosophical anthropology / philosophy of education

Buber's 1947 'Between Man and Man' — major essays on dialogue, education, and 'what is man?'

Published by Kegan Paul in 1947 (German edition 1948 as 'Zwischen Mensch und Mensch'), the volume collects key middle-to-late Buber essays including 'Dialogue' (1929), 'Education' (1925-26), 'The Question to the Single One' (1936, against Kierkegaard's solitary individual), 'Education and World-View' (1935), and the long programmatic 'What is Man?' (1938 — the inaugural Hebrew University lectures on philosophical anthropology). Together they form Buber's principal mid-career statement on dialogical philosophy outside 'I and Thou' (1923).

Author

Editions cited

  • Between Man and Man (Kegan Paul, London, 1947, trans. Ronald Gregor Smith); Zwischen Mensch und Mensch (Heidelberg, Schneider, 1948)
Compare this work

School Embodiments

Phenomenology · 22%
Rabbinic Judaism · 14%
Philosophy of Mind · 16%
Existentialism · 14%
Humanism · 18%
Hermeneutics · 16%
Phenomenology 22%

Dialogical-phenomenological methodology.

"All real living is meeting." (Between Man and Man, 'Dialogue')
Rabbinic Judaism 14%

Jewish-philosophical framework.

"The Jewish source of dialogical thought." (Between Man and Man, on 'What Is Man?')
Philosophy of Mind 16%

Major contribution to philosophical anthropology.

"What is man? — the central anthropological question." (Between Man and Man, 'What Is Man?')
Existentialism 14%

Dialogical alternative to Kierkegaardian solitary existentialism.

"The Single One must not be solitary." (Between Man and Man, 'Question to the Single One')
Humanism 18%

Strong humanist-dialogical framework.

"Genuine education is the cultivation of genuine relation." (Between Man and Man, 'Education')
Hermeneutics 16%

Dialogical-hermeneutic approach to interpretation.

"Dialogue as the form of authentic understanding." (Between Man and Man)

Internal Tensions

Buber's principal mid-career systematic statement after I and Thou.

⧖

I. Time

1929-38 essays; 1947 publication.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Relational Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One
✦

II. Space

Frankfurt / Jerusalem.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local
◉

III. Matter

Essay collection.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local
◎

IV. Observer

Middle-to-late Buber.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Immediate Knowledge Retainment: Partial Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Personal
⚡

V. Energy

Mid-career dialogical-philosophical energies.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible
⧉

VI. Information

Single essay collection.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Personas that cite this work

Martin Buber

Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint

Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.

94%
Emmanuel Levinas
32/34
94%
Martin Buber
32/34
88%
Desmond Tutu
30/34
88%
Howard Thurman
30/34
88%
Muhammad Iqbal
30/34
88%
Nikolai Berdyaev
30/34

Computed school proximity

The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.

75%
Confucianism
20/26
73%
Cybernetics
20/26
72%
Islamic Philosophy / Falsafa
20/26
72%
Process Theology
17/26
72%
Hylomorphism
21/26
70%
Systems Theory
20/26
70%
Hermeneutics
20/26
67%
Ubuntu / African Communal Ontology
18/26

How Between Man and Man resolves each dilemma

51 resolved positions across 4 dimensions · 6 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream
Do you really choose? The future is open and you are a genuine origin of it. 69% Are addicts responsible for their addiction? The addict could have chosen otherwise — that's why recovery is real. 69% Should we hold AI systems responsible for what they do? An AI without a free will is not the kind of thing that can be responsible. 69% Is the universe running out of usable energy? Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. 47% Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so? Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. 47% Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide? Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. 47% How much weight do future people deserve? Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. 32% Is regret rational? The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. 32% Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them? Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. 32%
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream
Is the world created from nothing? Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. 55% Is the physical world fully real? Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. 55% Does matter have intrinsic moral standing? Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. 55% What is money? Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. 54% What is a nation? A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. 54% What makes someone male or female? Sex is a real biological kind with given content. 54% Should we edit the human germline? Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. 54%
Observer · 37 dilemmas, all mainstream
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 37% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 37% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 37% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 35% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 33% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 33% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 33% Could an AI have a mind that matters? No — minds are not the kind of thing we engineer. 30% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Moral standing comparable to humans requires what only humans have. 29% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Without ensoulment, an organoid is tissue, not a person. 29% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 29% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 29% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 29% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. 29% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 28% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 28% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 28% Does history have a direction or meaning? — — How is knowledge of reality produced? — — Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? — — Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? — — What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? — — Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? — —
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Is anything truly lost when someone forgets? Information is conserved — the personal pattern is held even when an individual mind loses it. 39% Does deleting your data online destroy something real? Information at the cosmic level isn't destroyed; deletion only obscures access. 39% Could the dead, in principle, be brought back? The information that constitutes a person is conserved; restoration is in principle possible. 39% Is forgiveness ontologically possible? The offense persists ontologically; forgiveness is real moral work, but it doesn't erase what was. 39%
← #1630 Conversations with Eckermann All Works #1632 Two Types of Faith →