Miracles: A Preliminary Study
C. S. Lewis's 1947 work of philosophical apologetics — a defense of the possibility of miracles against the naturalist worldview
Tradition: Twentieth-century Anglican apologetics / Christian philosophy
Naturalism is self-refuting — and if naturalism fails, the antecedent improbability of miracles disappears
Miracles: A Preliminary Study is Lewis's 1947 work of philosophical apologetics, his most argumentatively careful book. Its central argument has two parts. First, an anti-naturalist argument: if naturalism is true, then human reasoning is fully explained by non-rational physical causes, and so there is no reason to think it tracks truth — naturalism, if true, undermines confidence in the reasoning by which it was reached. Second, given that naturalism is therefore unstable, the antecedent improbability of miracles (the standard Humean argument that miracles are by definition the most-improbable events) disappears: in a theistic universe, miracles are not violations of natural law but the lawful operations of a higher level of agency on a lower one. The book argues for the coherence of miracles in general and the credibility of the Christian Resurrection in particular. After Elizabeth Anscombe's 1948 Socratic Club critique of chapter 3, Lewis substantially rewrote that chapter for the 1960 edition; the revised argument is now the standard text.
Author
Editions cited
- Miracles: A Preliminary Study (Geoffrey Bles, London, 1947); revised edn 1960 (with chapter 3 substantially rewritten in response to Anscombe's 1948 critique); Fount/HarperOne paperback editions thereafter
School Embodiments
Lewis was Anglican rather than Catholic but his philosophical apologetics descends from the Thomistic-Aristotelian tradition through the Inklings' shared reading of medieval Christian philosophy.
"What I call Naturalism is the doctrine that only Nature — the whole interlocked system — exists. The whole of human reasoning is, on this view, one of Nature's interior happenings, just as much as digestion." (Miracles, ch. 3)
Lewis is a realist about human reason — its truth-tracking character is the central data point that the anti-naturalism argument depends on.
"Unless human reasoning is valid no science can be true. If Nature has given us reason, but reason is not valid, then Nature has betrayed us and we cannot trust her about anything — including the claim that we are nothing but Nature." (Miracles, ch. 3)
Lewis's "mere Christianity" approach — defending core Christian propositions accessible to all classical Anglican-Catholic-Reformed believers, without sectarian polemics — is in the broad liberal-theological lineage even though Lewis was doctrinally conservative.
"I am not arguing for Anglicanism or Catholicism or any particular denomination. I am arguing for the supernatural-Christian core that all classical Christians share." (Miracles, Preface)
Lewis's confidence that reasoned argument can establish a Christian metaphysical framework is rationalist in the classical apologetic sense.
"The question is not whether miracles occur, but whether they are antecedently possible. If they are possible, the historical evidence for some of them is excellent." (Miracles, ch. 7)
Lewis was not professionally an analytic philosopher but his 1947 argument was philosophically sophisticated enough to provoke Anscombe's detailed critique — the post-1960 chapter 3 is itself a piece of mid-century analytic philosophy of mind.
"The strength of an argument is to be measured by its content, not by who endorses it." (Miracles, ch. 3, 1960 revised)
Although Anglican, Lewis was widely embraced by twentieth-century evangelicals as the principal lay apologist of the orthodox-Christian supernatural worldview against secular naturalism.
"A miracle is not a violation of the laws of Nature, but an interference with Nature by something beyond Nature." (Miracles, ch. 8)
Lewis takes naturalism seriously as his principal philosophical opponent — the book's argumentative weight is concentrated on showing it self-undermining.
"My argument is not that miracles are not improbable, but that the standard Humean argument for their improbability presupposes a naturalism that, on its own terms, cannot stand." (Miracles, ch. 13)
Anglican tradition.
Internal Tensions
Anscombe's 1948 Socratic Club critique — that Lewis's anti-naturalism argument confused "causes" with "reasons" — was widely taken to have damaged Lewis's case; the 1960 revised chapter is a substantial reply but the debate continues (Reppert's C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea, 2003, defends a strengthened version). The book's treatment of "natural law" is sometimes loose by post-1960 standards in philosophy of science. The argument has been more influential in popular Christian apologetics than in professional philosophy, where the supernatural framework remains contested.
I. Time
The historical time of the Christian narrative — Incarnation, miracles, Resurrection — as events that can be examined for their credibility.
Attributes
II. Space
The created world as the natural space within which the supernatural can occasionally and lawfully interpose.
Attributes
III. Matter
Material nature is real and lawful; the question is whether it exhausts reality or whether a higher level of agency can act on it.
Attributes
IV. Observer
The rational human knower whose reasoning ability is the central data point against naturalism; the religious observer who recognises divine action.
Attributes
V. Energy
Natural energies as usually law-governed; miracles as discrete acts of supernatural agency that do not violate but supplement natural causation.
Attributes
VI. Information
The discrete miracle as an information-bearing event — an act of divine self-disclosure that the human observer can recognise as such.
Attributes
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How Miracles: A Preliminary Study resolves each dilemma
51 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 10 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 6 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.
6 mainstream positions
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream
Observer · 37 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.
28 mainstream positions
6 unaligned
Information · 4 dilemmas · 4 distinctive
Pattern, memory, and what is preserved or lost.