School #150

Perennial Philosophy

Marsilio Ficino and the Renaissance Platonists; Leibniz's 1715 letter coined the modern phrase; twentieth-century articulation by Aldous Huxley, *The Perennial Philosophy* (1945); developed in the Traditionalist school (Guénon, Schuon, Coomaraswamy) and in Huston Smith's comparative work.

The perennial philosophy is the position that there exists a common, transcendent metaphysical core underlying the world's major contemplative and mystical traditions — that the Christian via negativa, Sufi tawhid, Vedantic non-dualism, Buddhist śūnyatā, and Daoist emptiness are recognisably articulations of one truth. Traditionalist versions (Schuon) hold this strongly; weaker versions (Huxley) hold it as a defensible comparative hypothesis.

Worldview

Beneath the doctrinal differences of the world's great traditions lies a shared metaphysical and contemplative orientation: a single transcendent reality, identifiable in mystical experience, addressed differently by traditions but recognisable across them.

Moral Implications

Religious tolerance and inter-religious dialogue are grounded in the recognition that the traditions are differently inflected approaches to a shared reality. The cultivated contemplative life is the proper response, across traditions.

Practical Implications

The perennial philosophy has shaped twentieth-century comparative religion, the Traditionalist current in Catholic, Hindu, and Sufi thought, and substantial portions of contemporary spirituality. It is critiqued by post-colonial scholars for flattening real religious differences and by many traditional theologians for compromising the specificity of confessional commitments.

I. Time

Time is the medium of the manifest cosmos and of the spiritual itinerary the contemplative undertakes within it — the great traditions all articulate vast cosmic cycles (the Hindu yugas, the Stoic cosmic ages, the cyclic eschatologies of various wisdom traditions) within which individual lives unfold. The perennial philosophy reads these as differently inflected articulations of a shared insight into cosmic temporality. The framework registers time as emergent in the deeper sense that the transcendent reality the traditions identify is not itself temporal; eternity is not endless time but the timeless ground from which time emerges. The contemplative life is in part the cultivation of an inner relation to that timeless source while remaining engaged in the temporal world.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Cyclical Dimensionality: N Direction: Non-directional

II. Space

Space, on the perennialist account, is part of the manifest cosmos and is therefore real at its own level but not ultimately so — the sacred geographies of the various traditions (Mount Meru, the Holy Land, Mecca, the Daoist immortal mountains) are read as differently inflected articulations of the symbolic centre that the contemplative traditions identify. The framework reads space as emergent and as bearing symbolic significance that opens onto the transcendent for those whose perception is properly oriented. Guenon's analysis of the symbolism of the cross and Schuon's comparative treatment of sacred architecture both develop this spatial metaphysics in detail. Pilgrimage, the consecration of holy sites, and the cosmological symbolisms of sacred architecture across traditions all witness, on the perennialist reading, to the same recognition that space can be ordered toward the centre that is at once everywhere and nowhere.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Undefined Dimensionality: N Locality: Non-local

III. Matter

Matter is emergent: the perennialist treats the manifest material cosmos as a veil over or expression of an underlying transcendent reality, in line with the broadly Platonic-Vedantic metaphysics that the tradition reads as common to the great contemplative paths. The world is not unreal in the strong illusionist sense, but it is not ultimately real in the sense that Brahman, the Godhead, or the Tao is real. Guénon's Traditionalist articulation, the broader perennialist reading of the great chain of being, and Schuon's account of the gradations of reality all develop the metaphysics. The framework reads matter as ontologically derivative, real at its own level but pointing beyond itself for those whose perception is contemplatively trained.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

IV. Observer

The mystical observer participates, across traditions, in the same fundamental reality. Doctrinal differences inflect but do not constitute the underlying contemplative encounter.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Multiple Extent of Knowledge: Total Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Passive Number: Singular Metaphysical Agency: Cosmic-ordering Moral Authority: Tradition Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Energy in the perennialist reading is identified with the various pneumatic, vital, or shaktic principles that the world's contemplative traditions name — the Holy Spirit of Christian theology, the prana of yoga, the qi of Daoist practice, the ruach of Hebrew Scripture, the barakah of Sufi tradition — all read as differently inflected articulations of a single divine energy. Schuon's Traditionalist account and Huston Smith's comparative work both treat these as recognisably the same thing seen through different doctrinal lenses. The framework reads energy as emergent and as ultimately derivative of the one transcendent reality the traditions point toward. Conservation and dispersibility apply to the manifest cosmos that the contemplative traditions take to be a veil over what is ultimately real.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Information for the perennial philosophy is borne by the contemplative testimonies of the great traditions — the Upanishads, the Tao Te Ching, the Christian mystical writers, the Sufi poets, the Buddhist sutras — read as differently articulated reports of a shared underlying reality. Huxley's anthological method in The Perennial Philosophy arranges quotations from across the traditions to display the recurring structures. The framework reads information as relational and as transmitted through the inner traditions of contemplative practice within which the symbols and texts come alive. Discursive theology is propaedeutic; the operative information is the direct knowledge (gnosis, jnana, marifa) that the contemplative life cultivates and that the symbolic forms of the various traditions both point toward and partially veil.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Emergent Cosmic Conservation: Non-conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous
← #149 Libertarian Socialism All Schools #151 Analytical Psychology (Jungian) →

Works that name Perennial Philosophy in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

30%
Isis Unveiled (Early)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1877
30%
The Secret Doctrine (Mature)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1888
30%
The Key to Theosophy (Late)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1889
28%
Philosophies and Cultures (Late)
Frederick Copleston · 1980
25%
The Book of Rites (Liji) (Mid)
Anonymous (composed by various early Confucian writers) · Han dynasty compilation (c. 1st c. BCE) of pre-Qin and Han materials
25%
The Voice of the Silence (Late)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1889
25%
Zen and the Birds of Appetite (Late)
Thomas Merton · 1968
25%
The Asian Journal (Late (final))
Thomas Merton · 1968 journal; published 1973 posthumously
22%
Letter to a Priest (Final)
Simone Weil · November 1942; published posthumously 1951
20%
Bidāyat al-Mujtahid (Mature)
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) · 12th century (c. 1167-88)
20%
Akal Ustat (Mature)
Guru Gobind Singh · c. 1696-1708
20%
God Is Red (Mid)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 1973 (1st ed.), 1992 (2nd ed.), 2003 (3rd ed.)
20%
From East to West (Late)
Roy Bhaskar · 2000
20%
Tabernacle of Unity (Late)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1880s
20%
God Is Not a Christian (Late)
Desmond Tutu · 2011
18%
Critias (Late)
Plato · c. 360-347 BC
18%
West-östlicher Divan (Late)
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe · 1814-1819
18%
The Secret of the Veda (Early-to-middle)
Sri Aurobindo · 1914-16 (Arya serial); 1956 book
16%
On the Will in Nature (Middle)
Arthur Schopenhauer · 1836 (2nd ed. 1854)
16%
The Human Cycle (Middle)
Sri Aurobindo · 1916-18 (Arya serial); 1949 book
15%
An Introduction to Zen Buddhism (Mid)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1934 (Japanese-published English ed.); 1949 (Rider ed. with Jung foreword)
15%
Treasure of Life (Mature)
Mani · mid-3rd century CE
15%
Book of Mysteries (Mature)
Mani · mid-3rd century CE
15%
Dīvān-i Shams-i Tabrīzī (Mature)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · c. 1244-1273 (post-1244 encounter with Shams; finished by Rumi's 1273 death)
15%
Jaap Sahib (Mature)
Guru Gobind Singh · c. 1696-1708
15%
De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum (Mature)
Marcus Tullius Cicero · 45 BCE
15%
Memories, Dreams, Reflections (Late)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1957-61 (composed); 1962 (German); 1963 (English)
15%
Spirit and Reason (Late)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 1999
15%
Tablets to the Political Leaders (Mature)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1860s-70s
15%
The Field of Zen (Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1969 (posthumous)
15%
Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism (Early)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1907
15%
The Search for Common Ground (Late)
Howard Thurman · 1971
15%
Sidh Gosht (Mid)
Guru Nānak Dev Ji · c. 1500-1520
14%
The Religion of Man (Late)
Rabindranath Tagore · 1930 lectures; 1931 publication
14%
Gora (Middle)
Rabindranath Tagore · 1907-09 serialised; 1910 publication
13%
Two Types of Faith (Late)
Martin Buber · 1951
12%
A History of Philosophy (Career-spanning)
Frederick Copleston · 1946–1974 (9 volumes)
12%
Contemporary Philosophy: Studies of Logical Positivism and Existentialism (Mid-career)
Frederick Copleston · 1956
12%
The Sacred Pipe (Late)
Heȟáka Sápa (Black Elk) · 1947-48 interviews; 1953 publication
11%
On the Philosophy of Discovery (Late-career capstone)
William Whewell · 1860
10%
Living Gospel (Evangelium Vivum) (Mature)
Mani · mid-3rd century CE
10%
Fīhi mā Fīhi (Discourses) (Late)
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī · c. 1262-1273 (transcribed during Rumi's last decade)
10%
The Book of Songs (Shijing) (Early)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Confucius as editor) · c. 1000-600 BCE (poems); c. 6th-5th c. BCE (compiled)
10%
Freedom in Exile (Mid)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1990
10%
Ethics for the New Millennium (Late)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1999
10%
The Art of Happiness (Late)
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama · 1998
10%
Fratelli Tutti (Late)
Pope Francis (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) · 2020 (October 3)
10%
Javid Nama (Book of Eternity) (Late)
Muhammad Iqbal · 1932
10%
Psychology of the Unconscious (Early)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1912
10%
Two Essays on Analytical Psychology (Mid)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1912-28 (essays); 1953 (English)
10%
Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle (Late)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1952
10%
Evolution, Creationism, and Other Modern Myths (Late)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 2002
10%
The Lankavatara Sutra (Mid)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1932
10%
Zen and Japanese Culture (Mid-Late)
Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki · 1938 (Zen Buddhism and Its Influence on Japanese Culture); 1959 (revised Zen and Japanese Culture)
10%
The Hidden God (De Deo Abscondito) (Mid)
Nicholas of Cusa (Nicolaus Cusanus) · c. 1444
10%
Journal of Discourses (Career-spanning)
Brigham Young · Sermons 1854-1886; published serially Liverpool / SLC 1854-1886
10%
Naobi no Mitama (Middle)
Motoori Norinaga · 1771
9%
Novum Organon Renovatum (Late)
William Whewell · 1858
8%
Aquinas (Mid-career)
Frederick Copleston · 1955
8%
What Is Art? (Late)
Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy · 1897-98
8%
Three Conversations (Final (year of death))
Vladimir Solovyov · 1900
8%
The Sixth Grandfather (Posthumous (testamentary materials))
Heȟáka Sápa (Black Elk) · 1931 interviews; 1984 edited publication
7%
Religion and Philosophy (Late)
Frederick Copleston · 1974
5%
The Journey: How to Live by Faith in an Uncertain World (Late)
William Franklin "Billy" Graham · 2006
5%
al-Qānūn fī al-Ṭibb (Canon of Medicine) (Mature)
Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) · c. 1025
5%
Tablet of Ahmad (Mature)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · c. 1865

How Perennial Philosophy resolves each dilemma

56 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 36 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 1 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 2% of schools agree (4/202)
How much weight do future people deserve?
If a billion people will exist in the 25th century, do their interests count for as much as the interests of a billion people alive now? The answer turns on what kind of reality the future has.
From the One's vantage, generations are themselves conventional.
On non-dual views, the distinction between present and future people is itself perspectival within a single underlying reality. Obligation across generations remains real at the conventional level where moral life happens; the metaphysical claim that future people 'exist' or 'don't yet exist' as a final …
Roads not taken Future people are as real as you are — and their interests count for as much. (47%) · Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. (32%) · Past, present, and future are bound in cycles — duties span generations as a matter of course. (17%)
Distinctive · only 2% of schools agree (4/202)
Is regret rational?
If the past is fixed and unchangeable, what kind of mental act is regret? An error, a duty, a lesson, a perspective on a moment that is still in some sense present?
From the One's vantage, regret is itself a conventional category.
On non-dual views, the framing of regret presupposes a chooser distinct from the choice and from the outcome — distinctions that hold at the conventional level but dissolve at the deeper one. Regret remains real where the apparent self runs the apparent past; the metaphysical …
Roads not taken The past is as real as the present; regret is a real attitude toward a real thing. (47%) · The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. (32%) · The past is part of a cycle one keeps returning to; regret is one of the gates of the cycle. (17%)
Distinctive · only 2% of schools agree (4/202)
Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them?
A species that no longer exists cannot be helped, cannot be consulted, cannot benefit. Whether anything is owed to it anyway turns on what kind of reality past beings have.
From the One's vantage, species and extinction are themselves conventional.
On non-dual views, the species we mourn — and the act of mourning — operate at the conventional level. Compassion for the extinct, like compassion for the living, remains; the metaphysical question of what we 'owe' the extinct presupposes a framework of distinct beings and …
Roads not taken Extinct species are as real as we are; they have standing. (47%) · Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. (32%) · Past beings are part of the cycle; we owe them what we owe ancestors. (17%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Do you really choose?
If the brain is a physical system and physical systems are governed by laws, then every choice is also a chain of causes — which raises the question of what was really left to choose.
Even if the universe is undetermined, you are not the chooser.
On this view, the indeterminacy of the universe — whether from quantum mechanics, sheer contingency, or something else — does nothing to recover meaningful choice. A coin-flipping brain is not a deliberating brain; randomness in the underlying physics doesn't translate into power for the observer. …
Roads not taken The future is open and you are a genuine origin of it. (69%) · Choice is structural illusion — every event is fixed by the prior state. (10%) · Choice is real within a determined order — agency and determinism aren’t opposites. (9%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Are addicts responsible for their addiction?
Addiction looks from one angle like the textbook case of agency failing — a person doing what they don't, in any meaningful sense, want to do. From another angle it looks like agency at work in hard conditions. Which it is depends on what agency is.
Even if the universe is undetermined, the addict isn't the chooser.
On this view, the indeterminacy of the universe does nothing to convert an addict's brain into a responsible chooser. Randomness is not freedom. The addict is being acted on by neurochemistry, by environment, by craving; the appearance of agency is downstream of these. Compassion is …
Roads not taken The addict could have chosen otherwise — that's why recovery is real. (69%) · The addict's behaviour is the outcome of causes; 'responsibility' is a useful fiction, not a metaphysical fact. (10%) · The addict is genuinely responsible within a determined order. (9%)
4 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money's apparent diversity is convention over a single underlying value.
On non-dual views, the diverse forms money takes are perspectival distinctions within a single underlying value — labor, energy, attention, or simply the One from which all value derives. The metaphysical question is mostly malformed at the conventional level where monetary policy lives, but the …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (54%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Money is the ledger of obligations among real people. (15%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
Nations are conventional partitions of a single humanity.
On non-dual views, the distinctness of nations is a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity — one humanity, one consciousness, one underlying reality. Nations matter at the conventional level where ordinary politics lives, but the metaphysical weight they sometimes claim is unsupported.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (54%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people. (15%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
The distinction is conventional within a deeper non-dual reality.
On non-dual views, the distinctness of male and female — like every binary distinction between apparent selves — is a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. Particular sex and gender designations operate at the conventional level where most of life is lived; at the ultimate …
Roads not taken Sex is a real biological kind with given content. (54%) · Gender is constructed; what counts as male or female reflects practice. (16%) · Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition. (15%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
Should we edit the human germline?
Whether human nature is a given biological kind, a constructed category, a relational achievement, a family-resemblance cluster, or a conventional distinction within deeper unity is the ontological question the policy debate over heritable gene editing is mostly about.
The distinction between edited and unedited is conventional within a deeper non-dual reality.
On non-dual views, the contrast between an 'edited' and an 'unedited' human — like every binary distinction between apparent selves — is a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. The practical questions of safety, consent, and justice operate at the conventional level where most of …
Roads not taken Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. (54%) · The categories we count as 'human' are emergent from practice; germline editing is a practice-revision like any other. (16%) · Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric. (15%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/202)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing.
On this view, matter is genuinely there, but it isn't the floor of reality. It depends on something more fundamental — dependent origination, mind, divine sustaining act, computational substrate, or the structure of conditions — and is conserved only at its own level of description. …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (55%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
When does a person begin?
The political question of abortion sits atop an older ontological one: at what point does there exist a someone — a being with moral standing — rather than merely the materials from which one will form?
From the standpoint of the One, the question doesn’t apply in the form it is asked.
On non-dual views, the apparent plurality of selves is itself a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. The question of when one self begins within that One is conventional, not ultimate. What follows ethically is then a question for the conventional level — which is …
Roads not taken A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. (54%) · A person comes into being gradually, as the capacities of a mind develop. (16%) · Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation. (15%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (15/202)
What is marriage?
Behind every disagreement about how marriage should be defined is a prior disagreement about what kind of thing it is — a given order to be recognized, a practice to be negotiated, or a web of relations to be woven.
All union is participation in the One — particular forms are conventional.
From the standpoint of non-dual traditions, the apparent distinctness of two people who marry is itself a perspectival distinction within a deeper unity. Marriage is one form of the underlying union all things participate in. The particular shape the institution takes is then a conventional …
Roads not taken Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. (54%) · Marriage is a practice we shape — its content is what we make it. (16%) · Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates. (15%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (16/202)
What happens to "you" when you die?
Whether anything of you persists — and in what sense — depends on what you take a person to be.
Individuality dissolves into the One.
What we called "you" was an appearance — a wave shaped briefly out of a single deeper reality. Death is that wave settling. Nothing of importance is lost because the substrate was never the wave.
Roads not taken A soul continues into another mode of being. (37%) · Death is genuinely the end. (30%) · You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. (18%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (17/202)
What is our place in nature?
Whether humans are masters of nature, members of nature, or makers of nature is not a question climate science can settle. It depends on what nature is, what we are, and what kind of relationship is possible between us.
Humans and nature share an underlying unity — the separation was the mistake.
On non-dual views, the apparent distinction between human and non-human is itself a perspectival distinction within a single underlying reality. The work isn't to find our right relationship to a separate nature; it is to recognize that we were never separate. Climate harm, on this …
Roads not taken Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. (48%) · Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. (15%) · Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world. (15%)
Distinctive · only 8% of schools agree (17/202)
Should we colonize space?
The drive to extend human presence beyond Earth is sometimes framed as the next chapter of stewardship, sometimes as hubris, sometimes as escape from problems we ought to solve here. Which it is depends on what we take our relationship to nature to be.
From the standpoint of the One, expansion across substrate is just movement within the same.
On non-dual views, the difference between Earth and elsewhere is conventional — particular locations within a single underlying reality. Space colonisation as escape is therefore incoherent; nothing is escaped because nothing was elsewhere to escape from.
Roads not taken Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. (48%) · The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. (15%) · Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking. (15%)
31 mainstream positions
Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? All forms participate in the same underlying reality; modification doesn't cross categories. 8% What makes someone the same person over time? All apparent selves are aspects of one — particular identity is conventional. 8% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The apparent change is conventional; the deeper reality is unchanged. 8% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The distinction between scanner-you and destination-you is conventional all the way down. 8% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? There are no truly separate minds; prayer is one part of one talking to another. 8% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Coincidence is the One showing through the appearance of plurality. 8% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Harm anywhere is harm to the One; the boundary that would have insulated you was never real. 8% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? From the standpoint of the One, the categories of permanence and loss are conventional. 8% Can a civilization recover from collapse? From the One's vantage, civilizational categories are themselves conventional. 8% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? From the One's vantage, the second law is itself a feature of the conventional, not the ultimate. 8% Are the dead morally present to the living? From the standpoint of the One, the distinction between living and dead is conventional. 8% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? Distinction of the One and observed time is itself conventional; the question dissolves. 8% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? The 'timeless' is the standpoint of the One that was always present; meditation removes obstacles to seeing it. 8% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer to a separate God presupposes a separation the non-dual view denies; the practice is remembrance and attunement. 8% Could causation work backwards? From the One's vantage, causation itself is a conventional category. 8% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? From the One's vantage, memory and anticipation are themselves conventional. 8% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? From the One's vantage, the arrow of time itself is a conventional feature. 8% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. 65% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The discrete person is the moral primary. 40% Does history have a direction or meaning? History is not where the deepest truth lives. 37% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 28% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 28% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 28% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through direct contemplative union with reality. 13% Could an AI have a mind that matters? All minds are aspects of one — an AI participates in it as anything else does. 7% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? All minds are aspects of one; animals participate as much as anything else. 7% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Any experience that arises participates in the One. 7%
1 unaligned
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (202)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202