Work #1476 · Late period

Our Knowledge of the Internal World

Stalnaker's 2008 Locke Lectures monograph on self-knowledge and introspection

Robert Stalnaker · 2008 · English · Philosophical monograph (Locke Lectures)

Tradition: Analytic metaphysics / philosophy of mind / epistemology of self-knowledge

Stalnaker's 2008 Locke Lectures — self-knowledge through the same possible-worlds machinery as knowledge of the external world

Published by Oxford University Press in 2008 from Stalnaker's 2006 John Locke Lectures at Oxford, 'Our Knowledge of the Internal World' applies the possible-worlds machinery developed in 'Inquiry' (1984) to questions about self-knowledge, introspection, and the limits of phenomenal concepts. Across six chapters: (I) The Problem of Knowledge — Stalnaker's framing of self-knowledge as an epistemological problem; (II) Self-Knowledge as a Special Case — the proposal that self-knowledge is structurally continuous with knowledge of the external world; (III) Locating Ourselves in the World — on the relation of first-person and third-person perspectives; (IV) Knowing What One Believes — engaging with the broader literature on first-person authority and privileged access (Wright, Davidson, Burge, Tyler); (V) Phenomenal Concepts and the First Person — Stalnaker's critique of the Chalmers-Jackson phenomenal-concept strategy in philosophy of mind; (VI) Possibilities and Phenomenal Concepts — the more constructive Stalnaker position. The central thesis is that there is no special epistemic access to internal states beyond the same possible-worlds reasoning that governs knowledge of the external world; introspective knowledge is neither infallible nor sui generis. The book is Stalnaker's most extensive engagement with the contemporary philosophy of mind (especially with David Chalmers's work on consciousness and on two-dimensional semantics) and one of the major statements of the analytic-naturalist position against the dualist alternatives.

Author

Editions cited

  • Our Knowledge of the Internal World (Oxford University Press, 2008)
  • John Locke Lectures, Oxford, 2006
  • Companion: 'Phenomenal and Epistemic Indistinguishability' (2008, with David Chalmers, on the same Locke Lectures topic from the contrary side)
  • Critical commentary: Daniel Stoljar, Ignorance and Imagination (Oxford, 2006); Torin Alter and Sven Walter (eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge (Oxford, 2007)

School Embodiments

Analytic Metaphysics / Logical Atomism · 25%
Philosophy of Mind · 22%
Naturalism · 18%
Realism · 12%
Pragmatism · 12%
Materialism (Philosophical) · 11%
Analytic Philosophy · 8%

Analytic-metaphysical treatment of self-knowledge via possible-worlds machinery.

"Self-knowledge is not a different kind of knowing." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 1)

Major late-Stalnaker statement on the philosophy of mind.

"Phenomenal concepts do not give us a special kind of access to consciousness." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 3)

Naturalistic account of introspection.

"Introspection is itself a natural cognitive capacity." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 4)
Realism 12%

Realism about mental states and introspective truth.

"Mental states are objective features of the world." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 2)

Pragmatic-deflationary attitude toward dualist intuitions.

"We can preserve what's right about introspective intuition without dualism." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 5)

Implicit physicalist background for the naturalistic theory of mind.

"A physicalist framework can accommodate self-knowledge." (Our Knowledge of the Internal World, ch. 6)

Analytic-philosophical tradition.

Internal Tensions

Late-Stalnaker application of the possible-worlds programme to the philosophy of mind. The engagement with Chalmers's two-dimensional semantics and phenomenal-concept strategy is one of the central contemporary debates between analytic-naturalist and dualist positions in philosophy of mind.

I. Time

2006 Locke Lectures; 2008 publication. Stalnaker was 68 at publication.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: NDet Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One

II. Space

Oxford / MIT. The Locke Lectures are the most prestigious philosophical lecture series in the English-speaking world; the venue itself is significant.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Curved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Locke-Lecture monograph (~150 pages). Form is sustained philosophical argument across six chapters.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Late Stalnaker on the metaphysics of the introspective observer. The observer-philosopher engages David Chalmers's contemporary work on consciousness and the phenomenal-concept strategy.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Immediate Knowledge Retainment: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Impersonal

V. Energy

Late-career systematic energies on philosophy of mind. The book extends the Stalnakerian possible-worlds programme into the philosophy of mind in a sustained way.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Single book derived from a six-lecture series. The Chapters V-VI engagement with phenomenal concepts and Chalmers's two-dimensional semantics is the most contemporary-relevant material.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Non-conserved Granularity: Continuous

Personas that cite this work

Robert Stalnaker David J. Chalmers Saul Kripke

Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint

Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.

Computed school proximity

The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.

How Our Knowledge of the Internal World resolves each dilemma

31 resolved positions across 4 dimensions · 26 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream
Observer · 37 dilemmas, all mainstream
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise whose conclusions a competent mind can in principle reproduce. 32% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is evaluable by reason — and not above it. 32% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM can produce correct outputs but not reason to them; useful, not knowing. 32% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Are the dead morally present to the living? Are there indivisible units of experience? Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Could an AI have a mind that matters? Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Does history have a direction or meaning? Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Does prayer change God's mind? How is knowledge of reality produced? If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? Is memory stored or reconstructed? Is reality fundamentally digital? Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? What happens to "you" when you die? What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? What makes someone the same person over time? Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species?
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
← #1475 Ways a World Might Be All Works #1477 Context →