A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
Berkeley's 1710 treatise developing immaterialism and the doctrine that esse est percipi
Tradition: British empiricism / philosophical idealism
Esse est percipi — to be is to be perceived; there is no inert mindless matter; only minds and ideas exist
Berkeley's Principles of Human Knowledge is the most rigorous early-modern statement of philosophical idealism in English. Berkeley argues that the supposed "matter" of the materialists is incoherent: we have no idea of mind-independent material substance, and the doctrine that such substance exists generates scepticism, atheism, and absurdity. What actually exists are spirits (minds — finite, like ours, and infinite, namely God) and the ideas they perceive. The orderliness of nature is the order of God's perceiving and willing. Together with the Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous (1713), this is the foundational text of subjective idealism. Berkeley shaped Hume (against whom he is the principal theistic alternative), Hegel (who treats him in the Lectures on the History of Philosophy), and twentieth-century philosophy of perception.
Author
Editions cited
- Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues (Roger Woolhouse, Penguin, 1988)
- A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Kenneth Winkler, Hackett, 1982)
- Principles of Human Knowledge / Three Dialogues (Howard Robinson, Oxford World's Classics, 1996)
School Embodiments
Berkeley's Principles is the founding text of modern subjective idealism. Every later idealist tradition — Kant's transcendental, Hegel's absolute, Schopenhauer's representational — engages with the Berkeleyan starting point.
"Their esse is percipi, nor is it possible they should have any existence out of the minds or thinking things which perceive them." (Principles §3)
Despite his idealist conclusion, Berkeley is a thoroughgoing empiricist about the origin of ideas — Locke is his starting point. The path from Locke's empiricism to Berkeley's immaterialism shaped Hume's further radicalisation.
"It is evident to anyone who takes a survey of the objects of human knowledge, that they are either ideas actually imprinted on the senses..." (Principles §1, opening)
Berkeley's analysis of physical objects as bundles of ideas perceived under regular sequences is the historical fountainhead of phenomenalism, from Mill and Mach through the early Russell.
"The table I write on... I say exists, that is, I see and feel it; and if I were out of my study I should say it existed — meaning thereby that if I was in my study I might perceive it." (Principles §3)
Berkeley was an Anglican bishop, and his immaterialism is in part an apologetic strategy: matter's removal makes God's providential sustenance of the world directly visible.
"The very same principles which at first view lead to scepticism, pursued to a certain point, bring men back to common sense." (Principles, Preface)
Kant explicitly distinguishes his transcendental idealism from Berkeley's "empirical" idealism (in the B-edition Refutation of Idealism), but the tradition Kant founds is unimaginable without Berkeley's prior move.
"To exist is to be perceived; and that things have no existence distinct from being perceived." (paraphrasing Principles throughout)
A genuine typological resonance noted by contemporary philosophers (David Chalmers): if reality is a structure of perceptions sustained by a coordinating mind, then Berkeley's metaphysics is structurally close to certain simulation theories — with God playing the role of the simulator.
"All those bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world have not any subsistence without a mind." (Principles §6)
Internal Tensions
Berkeley's argument has been criticised since Hume and Kant for substituting one mystery (mind-independent matter) for another (the orderly God-sustained ideas). Samuel Johnson's famous reply — "I refute it thus," kicking a stone — is philosophically unserious but expresses the common-sense reservation Berkeley anticipated and addressed throughout. Berkeley's working-out of how unperceived objects continue to exist (God perceives them) has been read as elegant or as an ad hoc rescue.
I. Time
Berkeley argues (§§98–99) that time is the succession of ideas in a mind; abstracted from minds it is unintelligible. Time is emergent from mental life, linear within experience, non-deterministic in the human will's active employment.
Attributes
II. Space
Similar to time: space is treated as an idea given through sense, not as a mind-independent container. In the New Theory of Vision (1709), Berkeley argues that visual space is constructed from tangible cues — a doctrine that anticipates modern perceptual psychology.
Attributes
III. Matter
Matter, in the philosophers' sense of mind-independent substance, does not exist. What exists are ideas and the spirits that perceive them. The orderliness of "physical" objects is the regularity of God's perceiving and willing.
Attributes
IV. Observer
The Berkeleyan observer is the spirit — finite, plural, active in willing and perceiving, fundamentally disembodied (the "body" is itself a bundle of ideas perceived by the spirit). Knowledge is immediate. The metaphysical agency is unambiguously personal: God's perceiving sustains the orderly cosmos.
Attributes
V. Energy
Causal energy is the activity of spirits — there are no material forces. God's will is the ultimate energetic source; finite spirits cause within their limited domain.
Attributes
VI. Information
Ideas are the substantival informational content of reality. God's mind contains all ideas; finite minds receive them. Personal information is conserved across death — Berkeley retains a robust Anglican commitment to personal immortality.
Attributes
Personas that cite this work
Films that reference this work
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge resolves each dilemma
47 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 3 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 10 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream
Matter · 7 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.