Castigations of Mr Hobbes
Bramhall's 1658 follow-up reply to Hobbes — including 'The Catching of Leviathan'
Tradition: High-Church Anglicanism / anti-Hobbist controversy / political-theological polemic
Bramhall's 1658 final salvo against Hobbes — including 'The Catching of Leviathan'
Published in 1658 as Bramhall's last major work (he would return briefly to Ireland after the 1660 Restoration to become Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of Ireland, but would die in 1663 with no further major publications), 'Castigations of Mr Hobbes His Last Animadversions in the Case Concerning Liberty and Universal Necessity' replies to Hobbes's 'The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance' (1656). The Bramhall-Hobbes exchange had now been continuing for thirteen years: the original 1645 Paris discussion (when both were in exile); Hobbes's 1654 unauthorised publication of his side (under the title 'Of Libertie and Necessitie'); Bramhall's 1655 reply ('A Defence of True Liberty'); Hobbes's 1656 response (which Hobbes had wanted to title 'Of Liberty and Necessity, the Second Part' but published as 'The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance'); and now Bramhall's 1658 reply, his final entry in the exchange. The book's form is characteristic of seventeenth-century printed controversy: Bramhall reprints Hobbes's text in full, then inserts paragraph-length critical responses. The substantive philosophical issues are the same as in 1655: libertarian free will versus deterministic-mechanistic necessitarianism; the relations between will and intellect; the nature of moral responsibility under causal determinism; the metaphysical status of contingency. But the 1658 entry adds a substantial appendix: 'The Catching of Leviathan, or the Great Whale' — Bramhall's most extensive engagement with Hobbes's broader political-theological position in 'Leviathan' (1651), arguing that Hobbes's materialism is implicitly atheist, his ecclesiology Erastian-tyrannical, his contractarian sovereignty incompatible with natural law and Christian conscience, and his overall system corrosive of every existing civil and ecclesial order. The 'Catching of Leviathan' appendix became the principal high-Church Anglican anti-Hobbist treatise; Bramhall's framework shaped subsequent Anglican-political philosophy for two generations.
Author
Editions cited
- Castigations of Mr Hobbes His Last Animadversions in the Case Concerning Liberty and Universal Necessity, with an Appendix concerning The Catching of the Leviathan, or the Great Whale (Andrew Crook, London, 1658)
- In John Bramhall, Works, ed. A. W. Haddan (Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology, Oxford, 1842-45, 5 vols), vol. 4 (Castigations) and vol. 5 (Catching of Leviathan)
- Modern edition of the broader exchange: Vere Chappell (ed.), Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity (Cambridge, 1999)
- Critical commentary: Nicholas D. Jackson, Hobbes, Bramhall and the Politics of Liberty and Necessity (Cambridge, 2007)
School Embodiments
Late-Bramhall high-Church Anglican defence against Hobbes.
"Hobbes leaves no room for the Church, only for a state-religion." (Catching of Leviathan, ch. 4)
Scholastic-Aristotelian framework against Hobbist mechanism.
"His materialism cannot do justice to the soul." (Castigations, on Hobbes's De Corpore)
Continued libertarian defence of free will.
"Liberty is more than absence of external impediment." (Castigations, on Hobbes's reply)
Natural-law-political framework against Hobbist sovereignty.
"The law of nature stands above the will of the sovereign." (Catching of Leviathan, ch. 6)
Royalist-political alignment against Hobbist absolute sovereignty.
"True kingship is not Hobbesian sovereignty." (Catching of Leviathan, ch. 8)
Realism about substance, soul, and political order against Hobbist nominalism.
"Substance is not name; soul is not motion." (Castigations)
Internal Tensions
The most wide-ranging seventeenth-century English critique of Hobbes — political, theological, metaphysical. The 'Catching of Leviathan' appendix shaped subsequent Anglican-political philosophy for two generations; Samuel Clarke's 1704-05 Boyle Lectures continue the Bramhall anti-Hobbist programme in more philosophically systematic form.
I. Time
1658. Bramhall was 64, two years before the 1660 Restoration that would return him to Ireland as Primate.
Attributes
II. Space
London publication; Bramhall was still in exile when the book appeared (his return to Ireland came after the 1660 Restoration).
Attributes
III. Matter
Polemical-philosophical treatise plus 'Catching of Leviathan' appendix (~700 pages total in original). Form is interleaved Hobbes-Bramhall text (the Castigations proper) plus standalone treatise (the Appendix).
Attributes
IV. Observer
Late Bramhall. The observer is the philosophical-theological bishop in his final productive period, integrating the long Hobbes-exchange with the broader anti-Hobbist political-theological project.
Attributes
V. Energy
Sustained anti-Hobbist polemical energies. The thirteen-year exchange (1645-1658) is the most sustained seventeenth-century English philosophical controversy.
Attributes
VI. Information
Castigations plus Catching of Leviathan. The Appendix is the principal high-Church Anglican anti-Hobbist treatise of the seventeenth century.
Attributes
Personas that cite this work
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How Castigations of Mr Hobbes resolves each dilemma
31 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 3 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 26 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.