Hamlet
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark — Shakespeare's c. 1600 tragedy, the longest and most-cited of his plays
Tradition: English Renaissance drama
"To be or not to be" — Shakespeare's c. 1600 tragedy, the longest and most-cited of his plays, the central work of English Renaissance drama
Hamlet is Shakespeare's longest play and the most-cited literary work in English. The plot is structured around Prince Hamlet's response to the murder of his father (by his uncle Claudius, now King) and the demand of his father's ghost for revenge. The play's central philosophical-existential theme is Hamlet's protracted hesitation and his philosophical-reflective character — the soliloquies (most famously "To be or not to be," III.i) make him the major philosophical character of Western drama. The play has been continuously interpreted in different philosophical-theoretical frameworks: as Renaissance moral tragedy, as Freudian Oedipal drama, as existential meditation on action and meaning, as political analysis of corrupt sovereignty. The play's philosophical density and inexhaustible interpretive openness have made it the central work of Western literature.
Author
Editions cited
- Hamlet (Ann Thompson & Neil Taylor, Arden Shakespeare Third Series, 2 vols., 2006; the major scholarly edition)
- Hamlet (Philip Edwards, New Cambridge Shakespeare, 2nd ed. 2003)
- Hamlet (G. R. Hibbard, Oxford World's Classics, 1987)
School Embodiments
Hamlet's philosophical hesitation, his soliloquies on death and the soul, have shaped subsequent Christian-existentialist thought (Kierkegaard engaged Hamlet directly).
"To be or not to be" (Hamlet III.i, the canonical philosophical-existential soliloquy)
Hamlet has shaped subsequent existentialist literature decisively — the philosophical-reflective character facing existential demand.
"Hamlet as foundational existentialist character." (paraphrasing the reception)
A retrospective relation: Hamlet's philosophical hesitation and the absurd disconnect between demand and action have absurdist structure.
"The absurd hesitation between demand and action." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A working dramatic realism: the political-personal corruption of Elsinore is presented as really there.
"The reality of corrupt sovereignty and personal violation." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A retrospective relation: phenomenological engagement with Hamlet (especially the soliloquies as paradigmatic phenomenological self-analysis) has been substantial.
"Hamlet as phenomenological self-analysis." (Hamlet, paraphrasing the reception)
The Catholic theological background (Purgatory in the ghost's situation, the prayer scene where Hamlet considers killing Claudius praying) has been continuously analysed.
"The Catholic theological background." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A complicated relation: Hamlet has been to Wittenberg (Luther's university); the play has elements of Reformation theological engagement.
"The Wittenberg reference and Reformation theological elements." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A complicated relation: Hamlet's "what a piece of work is a man... and yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?" has nihilist resonance.
"What a piece of work is a man... and yet... what is this quintessence of dust?" (Hamlet II.ii)
A complicated relation: Hamlet's reflective philosophical character engages Stoic philosophical resources.
"Stoic philosophical resources in Hamlet's reflection." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A complicated relation: working political realism about corrupt sovereignty and its consequences.
"Political realism about corrupt sovereignty." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
A retrospective relation: postmodern engagement with Hamlet (Heiner Müller, Tom Stoppard, others) has been extensive.
"Postmodern engagement with Hamlet." (Hamlet, paraphrasing)
Internal Tensions
Hamlet's textual transmission is itself complicated — three early texts (Q1 1603, Q2 1604, F1 1623) differ substantially. The play's religious framework — Catholic Purgatory in the ghost's situation, Protestant theological elements — has been continuously analysed. The Hamlet of Freudian Oedipal interpretation, of A. C. Bradley's character-criticism, of twentieth-century existentialism, and of contemporary post-colonial and queer readings are all substantially different Hamlets.
I. Time
The dramatic time of action and protracted hesitation; the eschatological time of the ghost's purgatorial existence.
Attributes
II. Space
Elsinore as the corrupt political-personal space; the more open spaces (the graveyard, the seacoast) as moments of reflection.
Attributes
III. Matter
The embodied bodies of the characters; the dead bodies (Polonius, Ophelia, the gravediggers' skulls) as memento mori.
Attributes
IV. Observer
Hamlet as the central philosophical-reflective observer; the other characters as partial perspectives. Personal-providential framework implicit through the ghost.
Attributes
V. Energy
The energies of vengeance, hesitation, performance, dissimulation, and tragic action.
Attributes
VI. Information
The dramatic-narrative information preserved through the play's performance and textual transmission.
Attributes
Personas that cite this work
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How Hamlet resolves each dilemma
51 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 3 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 6 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.