School #63

Jewish Philosophy (Maimonidean)

Maimonides (Rambam), Saadia Gaon, Gersonides

Medieval Jewish philosophy, supremely represented by Moses Maimonides (1138–1204) in the 'Guide for the Perplexed' and the 'Mishneh Torah,' synthesized Aristotelian metaphysics with biblical monotheism to produce a rigorously rationalist theology. Saadia Gaon's 'Book of Beliefs and Opinions' (933) established the precedent: reason and revelation are complementary paths to the same truth, and apparent conflicts between them are resolved through proper interpretation. Maimonides radicalized this program through negative theology — God's essence is utterly unknowable; we can say only what God is not (not corporeal, not temporal, not composite, not deficient). Creation is ex nihilo: God brought time, space, and matter into existence from absolute nothing, not from pre-existing material. The purpose of human life is intellectual perfection — the cultivation of the rational soul toward knowledge of God, which for Maimonides is identical with knowledge of the natural world through philosophy and science. Gersonides (1288–1344) extended this rationalism, arguing that God knows universals but not particulars in their individuality, and that the stars influence but do not determine human affairs.

Worldview

The Maimonidean adherent inhabits a world that is rationally ordered, created with purpose, and fully intelligible to the disciplined intellect. To hold this ontology is to feel that the universe is a coherent expression of divine wisdom, and that the highest human vocation is the cultivation of the rational soul toward knowledge of God through philosophy and science. The fundamental orientation is one of austere intellectual devotion: God's essence is utterly unknowable, approachable only through the via negativa, yet the created order, its laws, structures, and regularities, is a luminous text that rewards careful study. Reality feels lawful, bounded, and morally serious, with no room for superstition, magic, or shortcuts to truth. The framework reads this as Personal metaphysical agency: even with Maimonidean apophaticism and the rejection of crude anthropomorphism, the God of Israel remains a personal divine agent who commands, hears, and stands in covenant relation with the people. The framework reads this as Tradition-grounded moral authority: Written Torah is read through Oral Torah — Mishnah, Talmud, the codes (including Maimonides' Mishneh Torah), and the ongoing halakhic tradition; Scripture without its interpretive community is incomplete, and the rabbinic chain is constitutive of the norm.

Moral Implications

The ethical framework of Maimonidean philosophy is grounded in the cultivation of intellectual and moral virtue as the path to human perfection. The commandments (mitzvot) serve a rational purpose: they discipline the passions, promote social harmony, and orient the soul toward contemplation of the divine. Justice and charity are obligations grounded in the rational order of creation, not in mere sentiment. Responsibility is individual and active: each person must pursue intellectual perfection through sustained effort, and ignorance, where it is avoidable, is a moral failing. The tradition also insists on epistemic humility before the divine: what we cannot know about God, we must refrain from asserting.

Practical Implications

Practically, this worldview encourages rigorous education, the study of both Torah and secular sciences, and the integration of philosophical reasoning with religious observance. It shapes attitudes toward medicine, law, and governance by insisting that these domains are governed by rational principles accessible to all. Maimonidean rationalism also generates a critical stance toward superstition, folk religion, and claims of miraculous intervention, favoring instead a naturalistic understanding of providence in which God governs through the regular operation of natural law.

I. Time

Time is finite and substantival — created ex nihilo by God as the measure of the created world’s change and motion. Maimonides explicitly argues against the Aristotelian eternity of the world: time had a beginning and will have an end appointed by God. Time is continuous, linear, and uni-directional: history moves from creation through revelation toward messianic fulfillment. Human freedom is genuine — Maimonides insists on free will as a cornerstone of the Torah’s moral framework, even while acknowledging the philosophical difficulty of reconciling it with divine omniscience.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is finite, substantival, and flat — created by God as the arena of physical existence. It is local: bodies interact through contiguous contact and spatially mediated forces. Maimonides follows Aristotle in treating space as bounded by the outermost celestial sphere, beyond which there is neither void nor place. The physical cosmos is a finite, ordered whole whose structure reflects divine wisdom.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter is finite, substantival, and created ex nihilo — God brought it into existence from absolute nothing, not from pre-existing material. This is the decisive break with both Aristotelian eternalism and Kabbalistic emanationism. Matter is conserved within the created order: once brought into being, the physical substrate persists through all natural transformations. It is local: material substances occupy determinate places and interact through physical proximity.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

The human observer is a rational soul embodied in a mortal frame, occupying a single moment and a single place. Knowledge begins in sense perception but reaches its perfection through intellectual apprehension of universals and, ultimately, of the divine. Maimonides holds that the Active Intellect — the last of the separate intellects emanating from God — illuminates the human mind, enabling it to grasp necessary truths. Knowledge, once genuinely acquired by the intellect, is retained permanently; the rational soul carries its intellectual perfections beyond death. Physicality is both: during life the observer is fully embodied, but Maimonides’s philosophical works suggest that the perfected intellect survives the body’s dissolution (the Mishneh Torah also affirms bodily resurrection, creating a famous tension). Agency is active: the observer must cultivate intellectual and moral virtue through sustained rational effort; no one is perfected passively. Multiple observers share a common created world and can verify each other’s findings through reason and demonstration.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Extent of Knowledge: Immediate Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Personal Moral Authority: Revelation Theological Method: Magisterial

V. Energy

Energy is finite, substantival, and created ex nihilo along with matter, time, and space. It is part of God’s created order, governed by the natural regularities that Maimonides identifies with divine wisdom. Conservation holds: the physical world operates according to stable, intelligible laws that preserve its fundamental quantities. Dispersibility is irreversible: natural processes move in one direction; the created order tends toward its appointed end under divine governance, and no natural power reverses the course of physical change.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Information is substantival — God’s knowledge is a real, ontological feature of reality, identical with God’s essence (Maimonides insists that in God, knower, knowledge, and known are one). Human knowledge participates in this divine information through the Active Intellect. Information is conserved: genuine intellectual truths, once apprehended, are eternal and indestructible. The Torah and the philosophical sciences are complementary repositories of the same fundamental truths about reality. The framework places this as conserved at both scales: God's knowledge eternally preserves cosmic information, and the rational soul (or, in resurrection traditions, the whole person) is conserved at the personal-identity scale — what God knows, God does not forget.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Films Reading Through This School (1)

Debates Where This School Is Allied (1)

← #62 LDS / Latter-day Saint Theology All Schools #64 Eastern Orthodox Christianity →

Works that name Jewish Philosophy (Maimonidean) in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

55%
The Guide of the Perplexed
Moses Maimonides (Rambam) · c. 1185–1190 (Cairo)
50%
Iggeret Teiman (Epistle to Yemen, c. 1172) and the responsa (Middle (between the Commentary on the Mishnah, 1168, and the Mishneh Torah, completed 1178))
Moses Maimonides (Rambam) · c. 1172
40%
Commentary on the Mishnah (Early-mid)
Moses Maimonides (Rambam) · c. 1158-68
35%
Mishneh Torah (Mid (the major legal work, between the early Commentary on the Mishnah and the late Guide of the Perplexed))
Moses Maimonides (Rambam) · c. 1170-80 (the second of Maimonides's three major works; preceding the Guide of the Perplexed of c. 1190)
35%
The Book of Beliefs and Opinions
Saadia Gaon · 933 CE
30%
The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous / composite (many authors, redactors, scribal communities over a millennium) · c. 1200 BC (oldest core) – c. 165 BC (Daniel); canon stabilised c. 100 AD
30%
Difficult Freedom (Mid (alongside Totality and Infinity))
Emmanuel Levinas · 1963 (collecting essays from the 1950s-60s)
30%
The Prophetic Faith (Late)
Martin Buber · 1949 (German); 1948 (Hebrew)
30%
The Jewish War
Flavius Josephus · c. 75–79 CE
30%
The Kuzari
Judah Halevi · c. 1130–1140 CE
25%
I and Thou (Mid (the foundational statement of dialogical philosophy))
Martin Buber · 1923
25%
Eclipse of God (Late)
Martin Buber · 1952
25%
On the Life of Moses
Philo of Alexandria · c. 20–40 CE
20%
Otherwise than Being (Late (the more radical successor to Totality and Infinity, 1961))
Emmanuel Levinas · 1974
20%
Tales of the Hasidim (Late (Buber's mature engagement with the Hasidic tradition))
Martin Buber · 1947 (The Early Masters); 1948 (The Later Masters); compiled over decades of Buber's engagement with Hasidism
20%
Time and the Other (Early (the breakthrough early work, before Totality and Infinity))
Emmanuel Levinas · 1946-47 (delivered as four lectures at Collège philosophique); published 1948
20%
Halakhic Man (Ish ha-Halakhah) (Mid)
Joseph B. Soloveitchik · 1944
20%
On the Creation of the World
Philo of Alexandria · c. 20–40 CE
20%
Commentary on the Torah
Nachmanides (Ramban) · c. 1260–1270 CE
15%
Totality and Infinity (Early)
Emmanuel Levinas · 1961
15%
Existence and Existents (Early (the first major book, before Time and the Other))
Emmanuel Levinas · 1935-46 (largely composed in a German prisoner-of-war camp); published 1947
15%
God in Search of Man (Late)
Abraham Joshua Heschel · 1955
10%
Metaphysics of The Book of Healing (Late)
Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) · c. 1014–1027 (compiled during Avicenna's years at Hamadan and Isfahan)
10%
Summa Contra Gentiles (Early)
Thomas Aquinas · c. 1259–1265 (Paris and Italy)
10%
Faṣl al-Maqāl (The Decisive Treatise) (Late)
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) · c. 1179 (Córdoba, Andalusia)
10%
The Zohar
Traditionally Shimon bar Yochai (2nd c. AD); modern scholarship attributes to Moses de León c. 1280 · c. 1280 (Castile, Spain); first published in print 1558
10%
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Mid-late (after The Human Condition, before The Life of the Mind))
Hannah Arendt · 1963 (New Yorker articles 1962-63, then book)
10%
The Origins of Totalitarianism (Mid (Arendt's breakthrough book))
Hannah Arendt · 1951 (with later editions adding new prefaces and material through 1968)
10%
The Origin of German Tragic Drama (Early (the most ambitious early work, before the Arcades Project))
Walter Benjamin · 1925 (submitted as habilitation thesis, rejected by the University of Frankfurt); 1928 (published commercially)
10%
Ideas and Opinions (Late (the most comprehensive single-volume collection))
Albert Einstein · 1954 (collected from earlier essays and addresses)
10%
Answer to Job (Late)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1952
10%
Theses on the Philosophy of History (Late)
Walter Benjamin · 1940 (German; English 1968)
10%
Spheres of Justice (Mid)
Michael Walzer · 1983
10%
Athens and Jerusalem (Athènes et Jérusalem) (Late)
Lev Shestov · 1938
10%
Austerlitz (Late)
W.G. Sebald · 2001
10%
Romans (Mature (Paul's most extensive and systematic letter))
Paul of Tarsus (Saul / Saint Paul) · c. 56-58 CE (composed in Corinth, near the end of Paul's third missionary journey)
10%
Fons Vitae
Solomon ibn Gabirol · c. 1045–1058 CE
5%
Ethics
Baruch Spinoza · completed c. 1675; published posthumously 1677
5%
The Quran
Considered by Muslims the direct word of God; transmitted through Muhammad; collected under 'Uthmān (c. 650) · c. 610–632 AD (the period of the Prophet's mission); 'Uthmānic codex c. 650
5%
Physics
Aristotle · c. 350 BC (second Athenian period)
5%
Theological-Political Treatise (Early)
Baruch Spinoza · 1670 (anonymously, with false imprint)
5%
Gravity and Grace (Posthumous (Weil died in 1943 at age 34))
Simone Weil · 1947 (posthumous; assembled from Weil's notebooks by Gustave Thibon)
5%
The Interpretation of Dreams (Early (the founding work of psychoanalysis))
Sigmund Freud · 1899 (dated 1900); revised through 1929 (8th edition)
5%
Kitáb-i-Íqán (Mid (pre-declaration in 1863))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1862 (composed in Baghdad in two days and two nights, in response to questions from one of the Báb's maternal uncles)
5%
Kitáb-i-Aqdas (Late (the major late doctrinal-legal book))
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1873 (in 'Akká, the prison-city where Bahá'u'lláh was exiled)
5%
Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (Mid-late (Averroes's major systematic philosophical defence))
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) · c. 1180
5%
The Hidden Words (Early)
Bahá'u'lláh (Mírzá Ḥusayn-ʻAlí Núrí) · 1858
5%
Man's Search for Meaning (Mid-late)
Viktor E. Frankl · 1946 (German original); 1959 (English translation)
5%
Dialectic of Enlightenment (Mid)
Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer · 1944 (private circulation); 1947 (Amsterdam edition)
5%
Negative Dialectics (Late)
Theodor W. Adorno · 1966 (German; English 1973)
5%
Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (Mid)
Theodor W. Adorno · 1944-47 (composed); 1951 (published)
5%
Eclipse of Reason (Mid)
Max Horkheimer · 1947 (English original; German edition 1967)
5%
One-Dimensional Man (Late)
Herbert Marcuse · 1964
5%
Eros and Civilization (Mid)
Herbert Marcuse · 1955
5%
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (Late)
Walter Benjamin · 1935-36 (multiple versions); first published 1936 in French
5%
Finite and Eternal Being (Late)
Edith Stein (St. Teresia Benedicta of the Cross) · 1936 (completed; published posthumously 1950)
5%
Two Concepts of Liberty (Mid)
Isaiah Berlin · 1958 (Inaugural Lecture as Chichele Professor at Oxford)
5%
The Hedgehog and the Fox (Mid)
Isaiah Berlin · 1953
5%
The Feminine Mystique (Late)
Betty Friedan · 1963
5%
The Claim of Reason (Mid)
Stanley Cavell · 1979
5%
The Trial (Der Process) (Late)
Franz Kafka · 1914-15 (composed); 1925 (posthumous)
5%
Escape from Freedom (Mid)
Erich Fromm · 1941
5%
The Life of the Mind (Late)
Hannah Arendt · 1977-78 (Vol I Thinking; Vol II Willing; Vol III Judging unfinished at her death)
5%
If This Is a Man (Se questo è un uomo) (Mid)
Primo Levi · 1947 (rev. 1958)
5%
The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy (Mid)
Viktor Frankl · 1946
5%
Sayings and Legal Traditions (Mishna, Talmud)
Rabbi Akiva ben Joseph (transmitted and compiled by students and later redactors) · Akiva active c. 70–135 CE; compiled in Mishnah c. 200 CE and Talmuds c. 200–500 CE
5%
Book of Jeremiah
Jeremiah ben Hilkiah (with Baruch ben Neriah as scribe) · c. 627–580 BCE (oracles); redacted and expanded through the 6th–5th centuries BCE

Personas with Jewish Philosophy (Maimonidean) as a declared influence

55%  Moses Maimonides (Rambam) 35%  Saadia Gaon 30%  Martin Buber 30%  Emmanuel Levinas 30%  Flavius Josephus 30%  Judah Halevi 25%  Paul of Tarsus (Saul / Saint Paul) 20%  Walter Benjamin 20%  Nachmanides (Ramban) 15%  Hannah Arendt 15%  Isaac ben Solomon Luria (the Ari) 15%  Henri Bergson 15%  Hilary Putnam 15%  Philo of Alexandria 15%  Solomon ibn Gabirol 10%  Baruch (Benedict) Spinoza 10%  Sigmund Freud 10%  Edith Stein (Saint Teresa Benedicta of the Cross) 10%  Hillel the Elder 10%  Rabbi Akiva ben Joseph 10%  Jeremiah 7%  Origen of Alexandria 5%  Zarathustra (Zoroaster) 5%  Solomon (traditional)

How Jewish Philosophy (Maimonidean) resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 5 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (24/208)
Is the universe running out of usable energy?
The heat death of the universe — entropy maxed out, no further work possible — is among the more sobering implications of mainstream physics. Whether it is structurally inescapable depends on what kind of finitude the cosmos has.
The cosmos has bounds; heat death is a real horizon.
On this view, time itself is finite — the universe had a beginning and will have an end. Heat death (or whatever the actual end-state turns out to be) is a real horizon, structurally implied by the kind of cosmos we live in.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. (47%) · Time both has and lacks bounds depending on the level you ask at; finitude is conventional. (26%) · Both time and matter are unbounded; 'running out' is misframed. (15%)
Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (24/208)
Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so?
Whether we can grow our way out of resource constraints — or whether the cosmos sets limits the economy ultimately must obey — depends on what kind of finitude matter has.
Resources are finite in the strict sense; living well requires accepting the limit.
On this view, the cosmos is bounded in both time and matter; resources are categorically not renewable beyond what cosmic processes provide. Practical limits and metaphysical limits coincide. Living well means living within limits, not engineering around them.
Roads not taken Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. (47%) · The finitude question is level-dependent; resource ethics happens at the level that constrains us. (26%) · Resources are practically inexhaustible on cosmic scales; terrestrial limits are engineering. (15%)
Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (24/208)
Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide?
If we owe future people a habitable planet and the material means to flourish, and the cosmos is bounded in ways that make those obligations impossible at some scale, the obligation and the possibility come apart. Where they come apart turns on what kind of finitude we live in.
The cosmos is bounded; our obligations to future generations are bounded with it.
On this view, the cosmos has limits; the obligation to future people is real but cannot exceed what the limits allow. The categorical worry about owing the impossible doesn't arise: the limits bound the asking. Ethics within a created or bounded order is the only …
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. (47%) · The owing-and-possibility question is level-dependent; we owe what is appropriate at the level we act on. (26%) · Both time and matter are unbounded; we cannot in principle owe more than is possible. (15%)
6 mainstream positions
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 2 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

35 mainstream positions
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 55% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 55% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 50% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 50% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 50% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 38% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 38% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 38% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 37% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 34% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 34% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 34% Could an AI have a mind that matters? No — minds are not the kind of thing we engineer. 31% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Moral standing comparable to humans requires what only humans have. 30% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Without ensoulment, an organoid is tissue, not a person. 30% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 30% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 30% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 30% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. 30% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. 30% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. 30% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. 29% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through a priori reasoning and conceptual demonstration. 24% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? The community is saved together or not at all. 14%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208