School #184

Western Esotericism

Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Eliphas Levi, Frances Yates, Antoine Faivre, Wouter Hanegraaff

'Western esotericism' is both a historical current and the modern academic field that studies it. As a current it embraces Renaissance Hermeticism (Marsilio Ficino's Latin translation of the 'Corpus Hermeticum', 1471), Christian Kabbalah (Giovanni Pico della Mirandola's 'Oration on the Dignity of Man' and '900 Conclusions', 1486), Renaissance natural magic and angelology (Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa's 'De Occulta Philosophia', 1531), Paracelsian alchemy, Rosicrucianism (the 'Fama Fraternitatis' of 1614), Christian theosophy (Jacob Boehme), Freemasonry, and the nineteenth-century occult revival of Eliphas Levi ('Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie', 1854-1856), the Theosophical Society and the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (founded 1888). As an academic field it was inaugurated by Frances Yates's 'Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition' (1964), given a typology by Antoine Faivre's 'Acces de l'esoterisme occidental' (1986, English 1994), and pushed toward a strictly historiographical method by Wouter Hanegraaff ('Esotericism and the Academy', 2012). Faivre's four characteristic traits — correspondences, living nature, imagination/mediation, and the experience of transmutation — together with the two non-intrinsic but frequent features of concordance of traditions and transmission through initiation, give the field its working profile. Esotericism in this sense is a wider category than Hermeticism proper, which is one of its principal historical sub-streams.

Worldview

The Western esotericist inhabits an enchanted, living cosmos articulated by hidden correspondences and addressed through the disciplined imagination. Reality is layered, symbolic, and responsive: the planets correspond to metals, the metals to organs, the organs to virtues; the divine names structure the sefirot, which structure the cosmos; the tarot, the I Ching, and astrology give intelligible access to the patterning of events. The fundamental orientation is one of initiation: knowledge worth having is transformative, not merely informational, and is transmitted within a chain of teachers and texts rather than disseminated publicly. The framework classifies this as Spirit-relational: the operative divine presences include hierarchies of angels, intelligences, demons, planetary spirits, devic powers and ascended masters, addressed in relational practice (invocation, theurgy, ritual), rather than the single personal creator-God of biblical monotheism, although many esotericists are Christian and happily nest their practice inside a confessional frame. The framework classifies this as Experience in moral authority: although tradition and initiatic transmission are honoured, the final test of any teaching is the adept's own transformative experience in the work — the alchemical opus, the magical operation, the visionary ascent — and a teaching is held to be true only when it can be inwardly verified.

Moral Implications

Esoteric ethics is built around the discipline of the adept: the cultivation of virtue, the purification of the imagination, the regulation of desire, and the fidelity to one's initiatic obligations. The alchemical motto 'ora et labora' couples prayer with disciplined work on self and matter. Practically the tradition has often been allied with reformist and tolerationist projects (the Rosicrucian manifestos called for a general reformation of learning; nineteenth-century occult revival circles attracted feminists and socialists), and it tends to a generous perennialism — the conviction that the various religions are different lenses on a common esoteric core.

Practical Implications

Western esotericism has been culturally pervasive far beyond its self-identified adherents: it shaped Renaissance art and the iconography of figures from Botticelli to Durer, fed early modern natural philosophy (Newton was a serious alchemist), produced Freemasonry and its political networks in the eighteenth century, inspired the symbolist art of the nineteenth, and supplied much of the vocabulary of the modern New Age. Academically, the field is institutionalised in chairs at Amsterdam, Exeter and the Sorbonne and is now a respectable area of intellectual history rather than the object of mere polemic.

I. Time

Time is Emergent and One-dimensional in its surface flow, but its larger Extent is Both — finite for each cosmic age but embedded in larger cycles. Traversability is Cyclical at the macroscopic level (the Great Year, the alchemical opus, the wheel of incarnations) and Uni-directional within each cycle. Freedom is Non-Deterministic: 'astra inclinant, sed non necessitant' — the stars incline but do not compel — and the adept can re-direct or amplify cosmic influences by intelligent practice. Historical orientation is Cyclical: the esoteric tradition typically reads history as the alternation of golden ages and ages of obscuration.

Attributes
Extent: Both Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Cyclical Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is Emergent and articulated across multiple planes (sensible, imaginal or astral, intellectual, divine) — hence its dimensionality is best described as N rather than as the merely sensible Three. Its Extent is Both, since the sensible cosmos is finite while the intelligible and divine planes exceed all bounds. Curvature is Curved (spheres, sefirotic trees, planetary heavens) and Locality is Non-local: sympathies and correspondences link distant bodies, and ritual at one place can act on a sympathetic object elsewhere.

Attributes
Extent: Both Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Curved Dimensionality: N Locality: Non-local

III. Matter

Matter is Emergent, three-dimensional, Finite and Conserved at the physical level, but Non-local in its causal relations because of the universal sympathies that pervade the cosmos. Alchemy treats matter not as the inert substrate of mechanical physics but as a living, ensouled substance capable of progressive purification; Paracelsus's iatrochemistry reads bodies and metals through the same cosmic typology. This is what most decisively distinguishes esoteric ontology from the mechanical philosophy that supplanted it in the seventeenth century.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

IV. Observer

The esoteric observer is a microcosm in which the macrocosm is reflected — the central claim of Renaissance Hermeticism, Kabbalah and Paracelsian medicine alike. Physicality is Both: the adept operates on the body, on the imaginative or astral level, and on the intellectual or spiritual level. Knowledge extent and retainment are Total in principle, available to the prepared initiate through the disciplined use of imagination, ritual, and contemplation; Faivre identifies the imagination as a real cognitive organ of mediation between sensible and intelligible worlds. Obs_time_instance and obs_space_instance are Multiple because the soul is held to participate in several planes of being at once and, in many strands, across several lives. Agency is Active and Plural — the path is one of personal initiation, not passive faith.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Multiple Extent of Knowledge: Total Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Spirit-relational Moral Authority: Experience Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Energy is Emergent, Infinite, and Variable: the cosmos is suffused with subtle energies and sympathies (the 'astral light' of Levi, the prana of theosophised orientalism, the universal spirit of Paracelsus) that can be concentrated and directed by the will and imagination of the operator. Dispersibility is Reversible because the alchemical and magical project is precisely one of reversal — solve et coagula, the breaking-down and re-composition of substances, the ascent of the soul through the spheres, and the restoration of fallen nature to its prelapsarian condition.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Variable Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Information is Substantival and Discrete because the cosmos is articulated by definite correspondences — between planets and metals, organs and herbs, sefirot and divine names, tarot trumps and Hebrew letters. These correspondences are conserved features of the cosmic order rather than human conventions, and the adept's task is to read them rightly. Personal-identity information is Conserved through the soul's ascent (and, in many strands, through reincarnation), and the initiatic transmission preserves a specific traditional content.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Discrete
← #183 Theosophy All Schools #185 Newtonianism →

Works that name Western Esotericism in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

6%
Isis Unveiled (Early)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1877
6%
The Secret Doctrine (Mature)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1888
6%
The Key to Theosophy (Late)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1889
6%
The Voice of the Silence (Late)
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky · 1889
6%
Etz Chayim (Posthumous (transmission))
Isaac ben Solomon Luria (the Ari) · Luria's teachings 1570-72; redacted by Hayyim Vital c. 1572-1620; printed 1782
6%
Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim (Posthumous (transmission))
Isaac ben Solomon Luria (the Ari) · Luria's teachings 1570-72; redacted by Vital; printed 1875

How Western Esotericism resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 36 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 17% of schools agree (35/202)
How much weight do future people deserve?
If a billion people will exist in the 25th century, do their interests count for as much as the interests of a billion people alive now? The answer turns on what kind of reality the future has.
Past, present, and future are bound in cycles — duties span generations as a matter of course.
On these views, time is not a one-way arrow but a structure of return: cosmic cycles, karmic cycles, the seasons, the succession of generations. To act now is always also to act for the ancestors who shaped your inheritance and for the descendants who will …
Roads not taken Future people are as real as you are — and their interests count for as much. (47%) · Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. (32%) · The future branches — what we owe depends on which branch we create. (2%)
Distinctive · only 17% of schools agree (35/202)
Is regret rational?
If the past is fixed and unchangeable, what kind of mental act is regret? An error, a duty, a lesson, a perspective on a moment that is still in some sense present?
The past is part of a cycle one keeps returning to; regret is one of the gates of the cycle.
On cyclical views, the past is not a fixed thing behind you — it is part of the ongoing structure of return: karmic cycles, cosmic cycles, the cycle of seasons and generations. Regret, on these views, is less about an unchangeable past and more about …
Roads not taken The past is as real as the present; regret is a real attitude toward a real thing. (47%) · The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. (32%) · Other branches exist; regret tracks roads not taken that are nonetheless real. (2%)
Distinctive · only 17% of schools agree (35/202)
Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them?
A species that no longer exists cannot be helped, cannot be consulted, cannot benefit. Whether anything is owed to it anyway turns on what kind of reality past beings have.
Past beings are part of the cycle; we owe them what we owe ancestors.
On cyclical views, the relationship to past beings — ancestors, lineages, predecessors — is structurally present, because past and future are part of the same ongoing structure of return. Extinct species are not categorically different from extinct human ancestors or non-yet-born descendants: all are part …
Roads not taken Extinct species are as real as we are; they have standing. (47%) · Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. (32%) · Extinction is path-dependent; the species exists in branches we didn't take. (2%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/202)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing.
On this view, matter is genuinely there, but it isn't the floor of reality. It depends on something more fundamental — dependent origination, mind, divine sustaining act, computational substrate, or the structure of conditions — and is conserved only at its own level of description. …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (55%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/202)
Is the physical world fully real?
Realists, idealists, and relationalists divide on whether matter exists mind-independently, derivatively, or as a pattern of relations. The split runs deeper than any single scientific question.
Real but sustained — not mind-independent in the strict realist sense.
On this view, the physical world is real enough — it has its own laws, its own conservation principles, its own resistance to wish — but it is not the floor of being. It is sustained by something else: mind, divine attention, computational substrate, or …
Roads not taken Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. (55%) · Real as relations — neither pure substance nor pure construction. (16%) · Real for this cycle — the deepest reality cycles through creation and dissolution. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/202)
Does matter have intrinsic moral standing?
Do rocks, soil, rivers, and stuff in general deserve moral consideration — or only the living, the conscious, the human? The answer turns on what matter is.
Matter is morally considerable derivatively — through what it sustains.
On this view, matter doesn't have standing on its own; it has standing through what it makes possible. Soil matters because it grows food; water matters because it sustains life and mind and practice. Asking whether the rock as such has moral standing slightly misreads …
Roads not taken Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. (55%) · Matter has intrinsic moral standing as part of the relational fabric. (16%) · Matter is in flux; standing is impermanent and ritual-mediated. (4%)
4 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Can prayer for someone far away affect them?
If you pray for a friend in another city, can the prayer reach them? The answer turns less on whether distance can be spanned than on whether anything beyond natural causation is doing the spanning.
Prayer reaches through ancestors, kami, or the spirits active in the world.
On this view, prayer is intelligible because the world includes spirits, ancestors, and energetic presences with whom petitioners stand in real relation. The prayer addresses these — particular kami, named ancestors, the orisha — rather than (or alongside) a single transcendent God. The practice is …
Roads not taken Prayer changes the pray-er, not the prayed-for. (49%) · Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. (37%) · There are no truly separate minds; prayer is one part of one talking to another. (8%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Are coincidences ever more than coincidence?
Thinking of someone and hearing from them moments later. Two friends humming the same obscure song at the same moment in different cities. Whether such patterns ever carry meaning depends on whether the world contains any ordering agency beyond chance.
Coincidence is the world speaking through spirits, ancestors, or signs.
On this view, what looks like coincidence is often the action of specific spirits or ancestors making themselves present — an omen, a sign, a felt arrival. The framework for reading such events is rich and particular: which spirit, what message, what response is fitting. …
Roads not taken Coincidence is exactly what the math says it is. The pattern is in the noticer. (49%) · What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. (37%) · Coincidence is the One showing through the appearance of plurality. (8%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Is reality fundamentally digital?
Pancomputationalism, Planck-scale quanta, simulation theory and Kabbalistic letter-mysticism all say yes — but for very different reasons. The rest of the atlas says no.
Yes — but divinely-discrete: divine letters, momentary cognitions, atomistic theism.
On this view, the world is at bottom discrete, but the units are not bare bits. They are divine names, momentary cognitions, karmic atoms, sacred letters — the elementary acts of a creating or ordering agency. Discreteness is real and fundamental, and so is the …
Roads not taken No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. (44%) · No — continuous fields, classical limits, analog deep structure. (37%) · Yes — bits, quanta, computational substrate. (13%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Are there indivisible units of experience?
Whiteheadian actual occasions, Buddhist moments of mind, Kabbalistic letter-cognitions, IIT phi-units — or the unbroken Jamesian stream? The atomism of experience cuts across naturalism and theism alike.
Yes, theistic atomism — actual occasions, divine letters, momentary cognitions.
On this view, the atoms of experience are not bare quanta but agent-laden moments: Whiteheadian actual occasions in which subjectivity and the divine lure meet, Kabbalistic letter-cognitions in which divine names act, Buddhist Abhidharma moments of mind, tantric ksana. The discreteness is real and so …
Roads not taken No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. (44%) · No — continuous Jamesian stream, phenomenological lived time. (37%) · Yes — naturalist quanta of experience. (13%)
Distinctive · only 6% of schools agree (12/202)
Is memory stored or reconstructed?
Engrams and traces — or continuous re-narration each time you remember? The cognitive-science debate has a theological cousin: divine memory holding each hair, or the ancestors' continuous remembering.
Stored — in divine memory's discrete particulars, or in karmic-record units.
On this view, memory is held in discrete particulars by an agency: the Lord who knows each hair, the karmic ledger that records each act, the angelic scribe who writes each deed, the Kabbalistic letters that spell each soul. Storage is real; the storer is …
Roads not taken Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. (44%) · Reconstructed — continuous re-narrating, no fixed engrams. (37%) · Stored — discrete engrams, traces, weights. (13%)
32 mainstream positions
What makes someone the same person over time? You span moments — identity is a pattern that need not be located at a single now. 9% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The person is the pattern across moments — diminished pattern, diminished person. 9% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? You are the pattern; the pattern survives the substrate change. You arrive. 9% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is real but accessible only from within a tradition. 10% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; what is real is the connection, not its length. 12% Are the dead morally present to the living? Observers span moments; the dead are present in a real (not merely metaphorical) way. 13% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? An observer can occupy multiple times at once; foreknowledge is not foreordering. 13% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation accesses a trans-temporal level the ordinary observer doesn't ordinarily reach. 13% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer participates in a trans-temporal liturgy or communion; the question of 'changing the mind' misses the trans-temporal mode. 13% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The cosmic-religious order is the moral primary. 14% What is our place in nature? Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. 15% Should we colonize space? The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. 15% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? What counts as a 'natural' genome is itself a construction. 15% Does history have a direction or meaning? History recurs in cosmic cycles. 16% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. 17% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. 17% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. 17% Could causation work backwards? Time is structured as return; 'forward' and 'backward' are local features of the cycle. 17% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? Memory and anticipation are phases of a cycle that visits both directions. 17% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? Within a cycle there is a direction; across the cycle there isn't. 17% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 37% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. 17% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. 17% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no first-person experience, so no knowing in the relevant sense. 17% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Liberation is the realization of cosmic or species self. 15% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through direct contemplative union with reality. 13% Could an AI have a mind that matters? Yes — mind is a pattern, not a substrate. 9% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? If the pattern of mind is there, the standing is there — regardless of species. 9% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? If the pattern is present at sufficient complexity, the experience is present too. 9%

Information · 4 dilemmas · 4 distinctive

Pattern, memory, and what is preserved or lost.

Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/202)
Is anything truly lost when someone forgets?
The memory you don't retrieve, the conversation you can't remember, the face you no longer recognise — is the forgetting a loss of something real, or just the routine operation of a finite mind?
Information persists or doesn't depending on whether the holder is sustained.
On these views, conservation is not a flat cosmic law but a function of the conditions that hold. Memory persists where it is sustained — by divine attention, by community, by ritual, by practice — and is genuinely lost where it isn't. The asymmetry between …
Roads not taken Information is lost when a mind forgets; matter and energy continue, but the pattern is gone. (51%) · Information is conserved — the personal pattern is held even when an individual mind loses it. (39%) · Forgetting is the cosmic case, not the exception; nothing is conserved. (1%)
Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/202)
Does deleting your data online destroy something real?
Account deletion, the right to be forgotten, the obsolescence of file formats, the slow decay of digital archives — whether any of this destroys something that was real depends on whether information is the kind of thing that can be destroyed.
Information persists where it is held; deletion releases what isn't held elsewhere.
On these views, information persists or doesn't depending on whether something is sustaining it. What is held in divine memory or in active communal practice continues; what is held only by the deleted artifact is genuinely released. The variable conservation maps onto a variable moral …
Roads not taken Information is genuinely lost when the substrate that hosted it goes; deletion really destroys. (51%) · Information at the cosmic level isn't destroyed; deletion only obscures access. (39%) · Nothing is fundamentally conserved; deletion is just routine impermanence. (1%)
Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/202)
Could the dead, in principle, be brought back?
If we had perfect information about who someone was — their connectome, their behavioral patterns, their history — could we, in principle, restore them? The question is partly engineering, but the ceiling on the engineering is metaphysical.
What is held by God or sustaining practice can be restored; what isn't can't.
On these views, the conservation of personal information depends on what is sustaining it. The Eastern Orthodox doctrine of resurrection holds that the person is preserved in God's memory and restored in the resurrection by divine action operating on what God has held. What is …
Roads not taken The information dissipates with the substrate; restoration is in principle impossible. (51%) · The information that constitutes a person is conserved; restoration is in principle possible. (39%) · Nothing of what was can be restored; restoration is wishful framing. (1%)
Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/202)
Is forgiveness ontologically possible?
When someone forgives, does the offense actually go away — erased, undone, no longer a fact — or does forgiveness reframe a wrong that persists exactly as it always was?
The offense persists where sustained and releases where conditionally absolved; forgiveness is real ontological work.
On these views, conservation is not a flat cosmic law but a function of what sustains. An offense persists where it is held — by holding-on, by ritual continuation, by divine attention to a particular debt — and is genuinely released where it is conditionally …
Roads not taken The offense is locally constituted by its substrate; when the substrate dissolves, the offense genuinely passes away. (51%) · The offense persists ontologically; forgiveness is real moral work, but it doesn't erase what was. (39%) · Nothing is preserved; the offense is impermanent, and holding it is the suffering. (1%)
Jump to school (202)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202