School #16

Panpsychism

Leibniz, Whitehead

Panpsychism holds that consciousness or mentality is a universal and fundamental feature of reality — not exclusive to brains but present, in some form, in all things. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's 'Monadology' (1714) proposed that reality is composed of monads, simple substances endowed with perception and appetition, each mirroring the entire universe from its own perspective — even apparently inert matter is composed of these perceiving units. Alfred North Whitehead's 'Process and Reality' (1929) developed this into a systematic metaphysics in which every actual occasion of experience, from an electron to a human moment of awareness, has a subjective pole — a primitive form of "prehension" or feeling. Contemporary panpsychists like Philip Goff ('Galileo's Error', 2019) argue that physics describes the relational and dispositional structure of matter but leaves its intrinsic nature unspecified, and that consciousness is the most plausible candidate for what matter is "from the inside."

Worldview

The panpsychist lives in a world that is alive all the way down. Every particle, every atom, every grain of sand possesses some rudimentary form of experience — not thought or feeling in the human sense, but a primitive interior quality that constitutes what matter is "from the inside." The universe is not a dead mechanism that inexplicably gives rise to consciousness in brains; it is a vast continuum of experience, with human awareness as a particularly complex and integrated concentration of what is already everywhere. This orientation produces a sense of profound kinship with the material world: stones, rivers, and stars are not mere objects but subjects in their own right, however dim their experience may be. The framework classifies this as Cosmic-ordering metaphysical agency: panpsychism reads consciousness as a pervasive structural feature of reality (an impersonal ordering principle) rather than as the action of a personal deity or operative spirits. The framework reads this as None for moral authority: panpsychism is a descriptive metaphysics about the distribution of experience and makes no normative claim — Scripture, Tradition, Reason, and Experience are not invoked as ultimate sources of how to act.

Moral Implications

If consciousness pervades all matter, then the moral circle must be radically expanded. The panpsychist cannot draw a sharp line between beings that matter morally and those that do not, because every entity has some form of interiority. This does not necessarily mean that an electron has the same moral weight as a human being — the richness and integration of experience matters — but it does mean that the destruction of any complex system involves the disruption of experiential processes that have intrinsic value. Environmental ethics takes on a new depth: ecosystems are not merely instrumentally valuable but are communities of experiencing subjects. The panpsychist ethic favors gentleness, minimal harm, and a reverence for the experiential dimension of all things.

Practical Implications

Panpsychism influences debates in artificial intelligence, animal rights, and environmental policy. If consciousness is fundamental to all matter, then sufficiently integrated artificial systems might genuinely be conscious, demanding moral consideration. In animal ethics, panpsychism strengthens the case for extending rights and protections to non-human creatures, since even simple organisms possess some experiential quality. Environmentally, the panpsychist treats ecosystems not as resource pools but as experiential communities, supporting conservation policies grounded in respect for the interiority of all natural systems. In science, panpsychism motivates the search for a fundamental theory of consciousness that integrates seamlessly with physics.

I. Time

Time is emergent — it arises from the experiential processes that pervade all of reality. Since mind is universal, temporal experience is not confined to human consciousness but extends to all entities. Time is continuous, linear, and uni-directional, reflecting the universal process of experience. Its extent is infinite because experiential reality has no temporal boundary.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Emergent Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Dimensionality: One Direction: Uni-directional

II. Space

Space is emergent — it is the medium through which experiential entities relate to one another. It is flat, finite, local, and three-dimensional in its macro-level structure, but at every point in space there exists some degree of experiential quality. Space is thus "filled" with mind in a way that pure materialism does not allow.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Matter is emergent — it is the exterior aspect of something that has an interior, experiential aspect. Every material entity, from electrons to brains, possesses some form of proto-consciousness or experience. Matter is conserved and local, but its intrinsic nature is mental rather than purely physical. The "hard problem" of consciousness dissolves because consciousness is a fundamental feature of all matter.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

The observer is not an exception in nature but an instance of something universal — consciousness pervades all of reality, from subatomic particles to galaxies, and the human observer is simply a complex concentration of what everything already has. Because mind is fundamental, the observer is not restricted to a single moment or place: consciousness exists at every point in space and pervades all of time. Total knowledge is in principle accessible, since the totality of experience across the universe is one continuous field of awareness. Nothing is lost — conscious experience is permanently retained in the fabric of existence. The observer is embodied and active, and what we call "observers" are plural, but at the deepest level they are expressions of a single, universal experiential field.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Multiple Extent of Knowledge: Total Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Cosmic-ordering Moral Authority: None Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Energy is emergent — it characterizes the dynamical relations among experiential entities. Conservation holds as a feature of the physical description, but the intrinsic nature of energy is experiential. Dispersibility is irreversible in the physical description, though the experiential character of energy transformations may have dimensions that physics alone cannot capture.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Emergent Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

Information is intrinsic to all matter — integrated information theory identifies consciousness with integrated information. Every physical system carries some information and some degree of experience. The framework places this as conserved at both scales: cosmic information is conserved because every physical system carries intrinsic experiential information, and personal-identity information is conserved in the sense that the integrated experiential pattern of a mind is a real feature of the cosmos that need not be wholly destroyed at biological death.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Experiments This School Responds To (5)

Films Reading Through This School (6)

Debates Where This School Is Allied (3)

← #15 Dualism All Schools #17 Pragmatic Realism →

Works that name Panpsychism in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

30%
The Conscious Mind (Early (Chalmers's breakthrough book, derived from his 1993 Indiana PhD))
David J. Chalmers · 1996
25%
The Character of Consciousness (Mid)
David J. Chalmers · 2010
20%
Symbols of Transformation (Early (the 1912 break-from-Freud book; revised in 1952 as the mature statement of analytical psychology's mythopoeic register))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1912 (revised 1952)
15%
Monadology (Late)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz · 1714 (written in French for Prince Eugene of Savoy); published 1720 in German
15%
Quantum: The Search for Links (Late)
John Archibald Wheeler · 1989
15%
Tantraloka
Abhinavagupta · c. 1000 CE
10%
System of Transcendental Idealism (Early)
Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling · 1800
10%
It from Bit / Information, Physics, Quantum (Late)
John Archibald Wheeler · 1989-90 (the "It from Bit" thesis articulated in conference papers and essays)
10%
Principles of Nature and Grace (Late)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz · 1714
10%
Modes of Thought (Late)
Alfred North Whitehead · 1938 (Wellesley & University of Chicago lectures, 1937-38)
10%
Attaining Enlightenment in This Very Existence (Sokushin Jōbutsu Gi) (Early)
Kūkai (Kōbō Daishi) · c. 817
10%
The Life Divine (Late)
Sri Aurobindo (Aurobindo Ghose) · 1914-19 (Arya magazine); 1939-40 (book)
10%
Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Late)
Charles Hartshorne · 1984
10%
On Nature and Purifications (Fragments) (Early)
Empedocles of Acragas · c. 450 BCE
10%
On Nature (Fragments) (Early)
Anaxagoras of Clazomenae · c. 460 BCE
10%
Matter and Memory (Matière et Mémoire) (Mid)
Henri Bergson · 1896
10%
Creative Evolution (L'évolution créatrice) (Late)
Henri Bergson · 1907
10%
The Dream of the Earth (Late)
Thomas Berry · 1988
10%
Black Elk Speaks (Late)
Nicholas Black Elk (Heȟáka Sápa), recorded by John G. Neihardt · 1932
10%
Reality+ (Late (Chalmers's major popular-and-technical synthesis on virtual reality and the simulation hypothesis))
David J. Chalmers · 2022
10%
Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam (Late)
John Archibald Wheeler · 1998
10%
Quantum Theory and Measurement (Mid)
John Archibald Wheeler · 1983
10%
Fragments and Testimonia
Thales of Miletus · c. 6th century BCE (original); testimonia preserved in sources from the 4th c. BCE onward
10%
On Nature (fragments)
Anaximenes of Miletus · c. mid-6th century BCE
5%
Process and Reality (Late)
Alfred North Whitehead · 1929 (delivered as Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh, 1927–28)
5%
De Anima
Aristotle · c. 350 BC (second Athenian period)
5%
Phenomenology of Perception
Maurice Merleau-Ponty · 1945
5%
Physics
Aristotle · c. 350 BC (second Athenian period)
5%
The Principles of Psychology (Mid (the major early work; foundational for both psychology and pragmatist philosophy))
William James · 1890 (after twelve years of writing; James later said he should not have spent so much time on it)
5%
On Nature (Fragments)
Heraclitus of Ephesus · c. 500 BC (the fragments preserved through later authors' quotations)
5%
Discourse on Metaphysics (Mid (Leibniz's breakthrough philosophical statement))
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz · 1686 (sent to Antoine Arnauld; not published in Leibniz's lifetime)
5%
New Essays on Human Understanding (Late)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz · 1704 (completed; Leibniz suppressed publication after Locke's 1704 death); 1765 (posthumous publication)
5%
Modern Man in Search of a Soul (Mid-late (mature systematic statement))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1933 (essay collection, English translation by Cary F. Baynes)
5%
The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (Late (the mature systematic statement of archetypal psychology))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1934-55 (essays composed across two decades); 1959 (compiled as Volume 9, Part 1 of the Collected Works)
5%
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous (Early)
George Berkeley · 1713
5%
Psychology and Alchemy (Late)
Carl Gustav Jung · 1944
5%
Memories, Dreams, Reflections (Late (the major autobiographical work))
Carl Gustav Jung · 1957-61 (recorded conversations with Aniela Jaffé); published 1962
5%
The Visible and the Invisible (Late)
Maurice Merleau-Ponty · 1964 (posthumous; composed 1959-61)
5%
The Essence of Manifestation (Early)
Michel Henry · 1963 (French; English 1973)
5%
Shōbōgenzō (Late)
Dōgen Zenji · 1231-1253 (95 fascicles)
5%
Wild Ivy (Itsumadegusa) (Late)
Hakuin Ekaku · 1765-66
5%
Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Bezels of Wisdom) (Late)
Ibn ʿArabī (Muḥyī al-Dīn) · c. 1229
5%
Periphyseon (On the Division of Nature) (Mid)
John Scotus Eriugena · c. 867
5%
Christ in a Pluralistic Age (Mid)
John B. Cobb Jr. · 1975
5%
Ambigua to John (Ambigua ad Iohannem) (Late)
St. Maximus the Confessor · c. 628-30
5%
Hymns of Divine Love (Hymnoi tōn Theiōn Erōtōn) (Late)
St. Symeon the New Theologian · c. 1020
5%
Triads (Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts) (Late)
St. Gregory Palamas · 1338-41
5%
The Bride of the Lamb (Late)
Sergei Bulgakov · composed 1939-42; published 1945 posthumously
5%
On the Infinite Universe and Worlds (De l'Infinito Universo e Mondi) (Late)
Giordano Bruno · 1584
5%
Time and Free Will (Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience) (Early)
Henri Bergson · 1889 (doctoral thesis)
5%
Leaves of Grass (Late)
Walt Whitman · 1855 (1st edn); 1881 (definitive); 1892 (deathbed)
5%
Faust, Part Two (Faust: Der Tragödie zweiter Teil) (Late)
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe · 1832 (composed 1825-31; published posthumously)
5%
Difference and Repetition (Différence et Répétition) (Mid)
Gilles Deleuze · 1968
5%
Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol. 1 (Late)
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari · 1972
5%
A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol. 2 (Late)
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari · 1980
5%
An Inquiry into the Good (Zen no Kenkyū) (Early)
Nishida Kitarō · 1911
5%
Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth (Late)
James Lovelock · 1979
5%
The Emperor's New Mind (Late)
Roger Penrose · 1989
5%
The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (Essai sur la théologie mystique de l'Église d'Orient) (Mid)
Vladimir Lossky · 1944
5%
Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind (Late)
Shunryu Suzuki (Suzuki-rōshi) · 1970
5%
Being Peace (Late)
Thich Nhat Hanh · 1987
5%
God Is Red: A Native View of Religion (Late)
Vine Deloria Jr. · 1973 (2nd edn 1992; 3rd edn 2003)
5%
Autobiography of a Yogi (Late)
Paramahansa Yogananda · 1946

Personas with Panpsychism as a declared influence

30%  Carl Gustav Jung 25%  Hildegard of Bingen 20%  Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 20%  Henri Bergson 15%  William James 15%  David J. Chalmers 15%  Abhinavagupta 10%  Julian of Norwich 10%  Alfred North Whitehead 10%  Jonathan Edwards 10%  David Bohm 10%  John Archibald Wheeler 10%  C. D. Broad 10%  Empedocles of Acragas 10%  Anaximenes of Miletus 5%  Daisetsu Teitarō Suzuki 5%  Anaxagoras of Clazomenae

How Panpsychism resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 16 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing.
On this view, matter is genuinely there, but it isn't the floor of reality. It depends on something more fundamental — dependent origination, mind, divine sustaining act, computational substrate, or the structure of conditions — and is conserved only at its own level of description. …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance. (16%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Is the physical world fully real?
Realists, idealists, and relationalists divide on whether matter exists mind-independently, derivatively, or as a pattern of relations. The split runs deeper than any single scientific question.
Real but sustained — not mind-independent in the strict realist sense.
On this view, the physical world is real enough — it has its own laws, its own conservation principles, its own resistance to wish — but it is not the floor of being. It is sustained by something else: mind, divine attention, computational substrate, or …
Roads not taken Yes — the physical world is fully real, mind-independent, persisting. (56%) · Real as relations — neither pure substance nor pure construction. (16%) · Real for this cycle — the deepest reality cycles through creation and dissolution. (4%)
Distinctive · only 23% of schools agree (47/208)
Does matter have intrinsic moral standing?
Do rocks, soil, rivers, and stuff in general deserve moral consideration — or only the living, the conscious, the human? The answer turns on what matter is.
Matter is morally considerable derivatively — through what it sustains.
On this view, matter doesn't have standing on its own; it has standing through what it makes possible. Soil matters because it grows food; water matters because it sustains life and mind and practice. Asking whether the rock as such has moral standing slightly misreads …
Roads not taken Matter is morally considerable insofar as it is created or conserved good. (56%) · Matter has intrinsic moral standing as part of the relational fabric. (16%) · Matter is in flux; standing is impermanent and ritual-mediated. (4%)
4 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/208)
What makes someone the same person over time?
When dementia hollows out memory, when a coma resolves with no recall, when you imagine being uploaded — the question of whether the surviving person is still you turns on what kind of thing the 'you' was to begin with.
You span moments — identity is a pattern that need not be located at a single now.
On this view, the observer is not bound to a single present. Identity is something that exists across moments — as a pattern, an ancestral line, a trans-temporal structure. Uploading, in this picture, is not a metaphysical impossibility but an engineering question; ancestors are real …
Roads not taken You are your body — continuity is bodily continuity. (36%) · You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. (30%) · There was never a fixed self to either preserve or lose. (14%)
Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/208)
Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married?
Loss of memory, of recognition, of the cognitive patterns that made the person — does this end the person, or merely the person you knew? The answer turns on what makes someone who they are.
The person is the pattern across moments — diminished pattern, diminished person.
On this view, the person is constituted by a pattern extending across moments — memory, narrative, characteristic ways of being. As dementia erodes the pattern, the person is correspondingly diminished. What remains is real but is less than what was; the marriage to the person …
Roads not taken Same body, same person — even when the cognitive pattern has changed. (36%) · The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. (30%) · There was no fixed person to lose; care is owed to whoever is here. (14%)
Distinctive · only 9% of schools agree (18/208)
If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived?
The Star Trek transporter problem: a machine scans your body atom by atom, transmits the pattern, builds an exact duplicate at the destination, and dismantles the original. Whether you arrive at the destination or die in the scanner is the question; the answer depends on what you are.
You are the pattern; the pattern survives the substrate change. You arrive.
On this view, you are the trans-temporal pattern that has shown up in this body up to now. The teleporter preserves the pattern — destroys one instance, builds another — and the pattern is what matters. You step in and you step out. The fact …
Roads not taken Different body, different person — you died in the scanner. (36%) · The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. (30%) · There was no fixed you to either survive or fail to; the question is malformed. (14%)
Distinctive · only 11% of schools agree (22/208)
Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species?
Different traditions take fundamentally different things to be the basic moral-political unit.
The species or biosphere is the moral primary.
The biological species, or the wider community of sentient life, is the moral unit.
Roads not taken The discrete person is the moral primary. (38%) · The community of persons is the moral primary. (28%) · The cosmic-religious order is the moral primary. (16%)
Distinctive · only 12% of schools agree (26/208)
Are the dead morally present to the living?
Ancestor veneration, intercession with saints, the moral weight of a promise made to someone now gone — these all presuppose that the dead are present in some sense beyond memory. Whether they are turns on whether an observer is the kind of thing that exists in a single moment or across many.
Observers span moments; the dead are present in a real (not merely metaphorical) way.
On this view, an observer is not located at a single moment but extends across moments. The dead, on this signature, are not gone — they are elsewhere on the same trans-temporal structure that you yourself occupy. Ancestor veneration, intercession with saints, the moral weight …
Roads not taken Observers are bounded by their own moment, and no further agency makes the dead present. (43%) · The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. (37%) · From the standpoint of the One, the distinction between living and dead is conventional. (8%)
32 mainstream positions
Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? An observer can occupy multiple times at once; foreknowledge is not foreordering. 12% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation accesses a trans-temporal level the ordinary observer doesn't ordinarily reach. 12% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer participates in a trans-temporal liturgy or communion; the question of 'changing the mind' misses the trans-temporal mode. 12% What is our place in nature? Nature is partly what we make of it — concepts, practices, and minds shape the world. 15% Should we colonize space? The 'space frontier' is partly what we make of it. 15% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? What counts as a 'natural' genome is itself a construction. 15% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% What happens to "you" when you die? You were always a pattern. The pattern propagates. 18% Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is mind-independent, universal, accessible in principle to all. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 55% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 55% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Moral obligation tracks the relations one is in; distance does matter, structurally. 50% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 38% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 38% Does history have a direction or meaning? History is not where the deepest truth lives. 36% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through a priori reasoning and conceptual demonstration. 24% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Liberation is the realization of cosmic or species self. 14% Could an AI have a mind that matters? Yes — mind is a pattern, not a substrate. 9% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? If the pattern of mind is there, the standing is there — regardless of species. 9% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? If the pattern is present at sufficient complexity, the experience is present too. 9% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust the method, not the institutions or the persons — and remain wary. 8% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is not knowledge in the descriptive-empirical sense. 8% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM produces tokens; calling that 'knowledge' is a measurement choice. 8%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208