Work #92 · Late period

Two Treatises of Government

Locke's foundational text of liberal political philosophy — natural rights, consent of the governed, and the right of revolution

John Locke · Written c. 1679–82; published anonymously 1689 · English · Two-part political treatise (First Treatise: refutation of Filmer; Second Treatise: positive doctrine)

Tradition: Early modern liberal political philosophy

Government rests on the consent of the governed — and when it fails to protect life, liberty, and property, the people may resist

The Two Treatises of Government is the foundational text of Anglo-American liberal political philosophy. The First Treatise demolishes Robert Filmer's Patriarcha, which derived political authority from Adam's divinely appointed dominion. The Second Treatise — the philosophically substantive part — develops Locke's positive theory: human beings are naturally free and equal, possessing natural rights to life, liberty, and property; political authority rests on the consent of the governed; government exists to protect natural rights; when government becomes tyrannical, the people retain the right to resist and dissolve it. The work shaped the American Founders (Jefferson cites Locke in drafting the Declaration), the French and American Revolutions, and the broader tradition of constitutional liberal democracy.

Author

Editions cited

  • Two Treatises of Government (Peter Laslett, Cambridge, 2nd ed. 1988 — student standard)
  • Locke: Political Writings (David Wootton, Hackett, 1993)
  • Two Treatises of Government (Mark Goldie, Everyman, 1993)

School Embodiments

Pragmatic Realism · 20%
Realism · 15%
Liberal Theology · 10%
Empiricism · 10%
Deism · 10%
Constructivism · 15%
Liberation Theology · 10%
Evangelical Protestantism · 5%
Reformed / Calvinist Theology · 5%
Social Contract Theory · 6%

Locke's political realism — natural rights are real, government is tested by what it actually produces for citizens — has been the foundation of pragmatic liberal political theory ever since.

"Government has no other end but the preservation of property." (Second Treatise §94)
Realism 15%

Lockean political realism: there are real natural rights that government is supposed to protect; political failures are real moral failures, not merely procedural.

"All men by nature are equal." (Second Treatise §54)

Locke's natural-rights doctrine has theological grounding (God as creator and proprietor of human persons); his Reasonableness of Christianity develops the liberal-Protestant religious framework of his political philosophy.

"Men, being all the workmanship of one omnipotent Maker, are His property." (Second Treatise §6)

Locke's broader empiricism (the Essay) is the epistemological background of his political philosophy; natural rights are knowable by reason on the basis of careful empirical reflection on human nature.

"Reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it." (Second Treatise §6)
Deism 10%

Locke's natural theology — God as rational creator whose moral law is accessible to reason — is the eighteenth-century Anglophone deist programme in nascent form.

"The state of Nature has a law of Nature to govern it." (Second Treatise §6)

Although natural rights are real, political authority is constructed through the consent of the governed. The constructivist dimension of Locke's political philosophy is distinct from Hobbes's in being limited rather than absolute.

"Men being by nature all free, equal and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent." (Second Treatise §95)

Lockean natural-rights theory has been a resource for nineteenth- and twentieth-century liberation movements: anti-slavery, anti-colonial, civil-rights. The right to resist tyranny is read across confessional boundaries.

"Whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people... they put themselves into a state of war with the people." (Second Treatise §222)

Locke's Anglican-Calvinist religious framework has made the Two Treatises accessible to evangelical political theology, especially in the American constitutional tradition.

"The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth." (Second Treatise §22)

Reformed political theology (Althusius, Rutherford, the Puritan covenantal tradition) anticipates and shapes Locke. Modern Reformed political thought (Kuyper, Skillen) continues this conversation.

"Whensoever the power that is put in any hands... is applied to other ends, and made use of to impoverish, harass, or subdue them to the arbitrary will of their legislators." (Second Treatise §201)

Social-contract tradition.

Internal Tensions

Locke's defence of property in the Second Treatise §§25–51 — including its extension to the Americas under the "vacant land" theory — has been criticised by postcolonial scholars as ideologically motivated. The relation between Locke's political philosophy and his personal investment in the Royal African Company (the slave trade) is the subject of ongoing scholarly debate (Jennifer Welchman, Brad Hinshelwood).

I. Time

Real historical time is the medium of political development. The right of revolution presupposes real future-open political possibility.

Attributes
Extent: Both Ontological Status: Substantival Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One

II. Space

The territorial state is the natural unit of political community. Substantival, finite, local.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Property in the state of nature begins with mixing one's labour with material things. Matter is real, substantival.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

The Lockean observer is the embodied free individual, plural, active in political life. Moral authority is reason (natural law). The metaphysical agency is personal — God as creator and proprietor of persons.

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Immediate Knowledge Retainment: Total Physicality: Embodied Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Personal

V. Energy

Not engaged philosophically.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Irreversible

VI. Information

The covenant of consent generates legitimate political authority. Personal information conserved across death (standard Christian framework).

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Personas that cite this work

John Locke Thomas Jefferson Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet)

Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint

Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.

Computed school proximity

The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.

How Two Treatises of Government resolves each dilemma

51 resolved positions across 4 dimensions · 6 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas, all mainstream
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream
Observer · 37 dilemmas, all mainstream
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. 66% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. 66% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. 66% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Is reality fundamentally digital? No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. 44% Are there indivisible units of experience? No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. 44% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. 44% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 37% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. 37% Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. 37% Are the dead morally present to the living? The dead are present through divine memory, communion of saints, or ancestor presence. 35% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? The human observer is in time, but God's vantage is not — and foreknowledge is not foreordering. 33% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation participates in a real eternity — divine or cosmic — that the bounded human observer ordinarily cannot reach. 33% Does prayer change God's mind? God sees from outside time; prayer doesn't change God's mind, but it is part of how providence is enacted. 33% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise whose conclusions a competent mind can in principle reproduce. 32% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is evaluable by reason — and not above it. 32% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM can produce correct outputs but not reason to them; useful, not knowing. 32% Could an AI have a mind that matters? No — minds are not the kind of thing we engineer. 30% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Moral standing comparable to humans requires what only humans have. 29% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Without ensoulment, an organoid is tissue, not a person. 29% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 29% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 29% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 29% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. 29% Does history have a direction or meaning? How is knowledge of reality produced? Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species?
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
← #91 De Cive All Works #93 A Treatise of Human Nature →