Work #1642 · Early period

The Church and the Second Sex

Mary Daly's 1968 first book — Catholic-feminist critique of the patriarchal Church

Mary Daly · 1968 (rev. 1975) · English · Theological-feminist monograph

Tradition: Catholic feminism / second-wave radical feminism / post-Vatican-II theology

Daly's 1968 'Church and the Second Sex' — Catholic-feminist critique of patriarchy in the Roman Church (later renounced)

Published by Harper & Row in 1968 (with a 1975 expanded edition adding the famous 'Feminist Postchristian Introduction' in which Daly substantially revised her own earlier position), 'The Church and the Second Sex' is Mary Daly's first book and the founding work of Catholic feminist theology. The title deliberately echoes Simone de Beauvoir's 'Le Deuxième Sexe' (1949) — Daly was applying Beauvoir's analytical framework to the Roman Catholic Church specifically. The 1968 edition's central thesis: the historical-sociological evidence shows the Catholic Church to be a profoundly patriarchal-misogynist institution (the book documents the misogyny of major Church Fathers — Tertullian, Augustine, Jerome, Aquinas — and traces its consequences across Catholic theology, canon law, ecclesial structure, and pastoral practice); but reform is possible from within (Daly was still teaching at Jesuit Boston College when she wrote the book and writing as a Catholic). The book provoked immediate controversy — Boston College tried to fire Daly in 1969, but student protests led to her reinstatement and tenure in 1972. By the 1975 second edition, however, Daly had concluded that reform from within was impossible: the new introduction explicitly renounces the reformist position of the 1968 edition and declares Daly's post-Christian position. The book is thus a doubly important text: as the founding work of Catholic feminist theology (in its 1968 form) and as the founding moment of post-Christian-feminist theology (in the 1975 'Postchristian' edition). The trajectory across the two editions — from reformist to revolutionary — is itself a paradigmatic case in late-twentieth-century religious feminism.

Author

Editions cited

  • The Church and the Second Sex (Harper & Row, New York, 1968)
  • Expanded edition with new 'Feminist Postchristian Introduction' (Beacon Press, Boston, 1975)
  • With additional 1985 postscript: The Church and the Second Sex: With the Feminist Postchristian Introduction and New Archaic Afterwords (Beacon, 1985)
  • Critical context: Mary E. Hunt and Diann L. Neu (eds.), New Feminist Christianity (SkyLight Paths, 2010); Sarah L. MacMillen, Mary Daly's 'Methodicide' (Routledge, 2018)

School Embodiments

Feminism · 28%
Catholic/Thomistic · 12%
Philosophy of Religion · 18%
Critical Theory · 14%
Intersectionality · 11%
Humanism · 17%
Feminism 28%

Founding Catholic-feminist work.

"The Church and the second sex." (Church and Second Sex, title — echoing Beauvoir)

Initial Catholic-confessional framework (later renounced).

"Originally written within the Catholic tradition." (Church and Second Sex, 1975 introduction)

Major feminist philosophy-of-religion work.

"Patriarchal theology as the central religious problem." (Church and Second Sex)

Critical-theoretical analysis of patriarchal institutions.

"Patriarchy as the structural ground of misogyny." (Church and Second Sex)

Early articulation of gender-religion intersection.

"Gender and religious institution." (Church and Second Sex)
Humanism 17%

Humanist-radical framework underlying the critique.

"The full humanity of women." (Church and Second Sex)

Internal Tensions

Daly's first book; Catholic-feminist starting point that she would later renounce. The 1968 edition founded Catholic feminist theology; the 1975 'Postchristian' edition founded post-Christian feminist theology. Both positions remain live in subsequent religious-feminist literature.

I. Time

1968 first edition; 1975 substantially revised second edition; 1985 third with additional afterwords. Daly was 40 at first publication.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Relational Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Linear Direction: Uni-directional Dimensionality: One

II. Space

Boston College — the Jesuit institution where Daly was a junior faculty member when she wrote the book. Her near-firing in 1969 (and successful reinstatement after student protests) shaped her subsequent career and her movement to a post-Christian position.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Relational Curvature: Flat Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

III. Matter

Single feminist-theological monograph (~240 pages first ed.; ~280 pages with subsequent introductions). Form is essayistic-systematic with extensive historical-theological documentation.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Local

IV. Observer

Early Daly. The observer-philosopher is in the moment of transition between Catholic reformist position (1968) and post-Christian radical-feminist position (1975).

Attributes
Time Instance: Single Space Instance: Single Knowledge Extent: Immediate Knowledge Retainment: Partial Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Impersonal

V. Energy

Founding feminist-theological energies. The book is the most concentrated single document of the late-1960s transition from Catholic-reformist feminism to post-Christian radical-feminism.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Single book with later autocritical introduction. The doubled-edition structure (1968 + 1975 + 1985 expansions) is itself a thematic document of the transition the book records.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Relational Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Continuous

Personas that cite this work

Mary Daly Simone de Beauvoir

Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint

Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.

Computed school proximity

The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.

How The Church and the Second Sex resolves each dilemma

37 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 6 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 20 unaligned.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Is the universe running out of usable energy?
The heat death of the universe — entropy maxed out, no further work possible — is among the more sobering implications of mainstream physics. Whether it is structurally inescapable depends on what kind of finitude the cosmos has.
Both time and matter are unbounded; 'running out' is misframed.
On this view, the cosmos has neither a temporal horizon nor a material exhaustion point. The framing of running out presupposes bounds that the cosmos doesn't have. Energy gradients perpetuate; new configurations emerge; the categories that make heat-death scary don't apply at the cosmic scale.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. (47%) · Time both has and lacks bounds depending on the level you ask at; finitude is conventional. (26%) · The cosmos has bounds; heat death is a real horizon. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so?
Whether we can grow our way out of resource constraints — or whether the cosmos sets limits the economy ultimately must obey — depends on what kind of finitude matter has.
Resources are practically inexhaustible on cosmic scales; terrestrial limits are engineering.
On this view, matter and time are both unbounded at the largest scales. Terrestrial resource limits are real engineering and political constraints but not metaphysical ones; the cosmos can in principle support whatever expansion intelligence is capable of.
Roads not taken Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. (47%) · The finitude question is level-dependent; resource ethics happens at the level that constrains us. (26%) · Resources are finite in the strict sense; living well requires accepting the limit. (12%)
Distinctive · only 15% of schools agree (31/202)
Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide?
If we owe future people a habitable planet and the material means to flourish, and the cosmos is bounded in ways that make those obligations impossible at some scale, the obligation and the possibility come apart. Where they come apart turns on what kind of finitude we live in.
Both time and matter are unbounded; we cannot in principle owe more than is possible.
On this view, the cosmos has the resources to support whatever flourishing future generations are capable of, given sufficient time and intelligence. The impossibility concern is misplaced; the real questions are about trajectories and choices, not about resource ceilings.
Roads not taken Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. (47%) · The owing-and-possibility question is level-dependent; we owe what is appropriate at the level we act on. (26%) · The cosmos is bounded; our obligations to future generations are bounded with it. (12%)
6 mainstream positions
Matter · 7 dilemmas, all mainstream

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/202)
Is environmental damage ever truly permanent?
Extinction is forever; soil erosion takes centuries to repair; the carbon we emit will warm the climate for millennia. But whether 'forever' or 'millennia' means what they say depends on what kind of process the universe is.
What appears irreversible is reversible by the right action.
On this view, the appearance of permanence is a function of limits we have not yet exceeded. Divine action, sufficiently advanced technology, intentional restoration practice can in principle reverse what now appears irreversible. The lost is not gone for good; it is gone for now.
Roads not taken Damage is real and permanent on the relevant timescales. There is no recovery; there is only limitation. (66%) · Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. (17%) · From the standpoint of the One, the categories of permanence and loss are conventional. (8%)
Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/202)
Can a civilization recover from collapse?
Rome fell; Maya cities emptied; Bronze Age trade networks collapsed in a single generation. Whether what was lost can be recovered — or whether collapse is structurally final — depends on what kind of process civilization is.
Civilization is the kind of order that can in principle be restored.
On this view, the order that constitutes civilization — information, practices, institutions, ethics — is not destroyed by collapse, only dispersed. Given the right work, by humans, divine action, or both, it can be reconstituted. The historical pattern of recovery and renewal is partial evidence; …
Roads not taken Civilizational complexity is hard to build and easy to lose; recovery is at best partial. (66%) · Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. (17%) · From the One's vantage, civilizational categories are themselves conventional. (8%)
Distinctive · only 5% of schools agree (11/202)
Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally?
The universe trends from order to disorder. Whether that physical pattern carries moral weight — making the preservation of order, beauty, complexity a kind of cosmic duty — depends on whether time has the kind of structure morality could lean on.
Apparent entropy is reversible in principle; the moral category is restoration.
On this view, the second law describes local pattern rather than cosmic destiny. What is broken can be repaired — by divine action, by human work, by energetic intervention. The moral weight of restoration is real and not borrowed from the physics. The cosmos is …
Roads not taken Entropy is what time is. The moral weight, if any, is the weight of working against the current. (66%) · Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. (17%) · From the One's vantage, the second law is itself a feature of the conventional, not the ultimate. (8%)
14 mainstream positions
Could causation work backwards? Causation runs one way — the arrow of time is real and structural. 68% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? The asymmetry is real because time itself has a real direction. 68% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? The arrow is real and structural; the asymmetry isn't an artifact of description. 68% When does a person begin? A person exists from conception — when a new being comes into existence. 54% What is marriage? Marriage has a given form — it’s a kind of thing we recognize, not make. 54% What is our place in nature? Active in a real nature — we cultivate, steward, transform. 48% Should we colonize space? Cultivating worlds beyond Earth is the next form of stewardship. 48% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Genetic modification is cultivation by other means. 48% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise whose conclusions a competent mind can in principle reproduce. 32% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? Revelation is evaluable by reason — and not above it. 32% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM can produce correct outputs but not reason to them; useful, not knowing. 32% What makes someone the same person over time? You are a soul — what persists through change is the non-bodily aspect. 29% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The soul persists; the cognitive change is the body's, not the person's. 29% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? The soul accompanies the person; engineering can't transfer it. 29%
20 unaligned
Are coincidences ever more than coincidence? Schools split: 49% / 37% / 8% Are the dead morally present to the living? Schools split: 44% / 35% / 13% Are there indivisible units of experience? Schools split: 44% / 37% / 13% Can prayer for someone far away affect them? Schools split: 49% / 37% / 8% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? Schools split: 32% / 29% / 11% Could an AI have a mind that matters? Schools split: 30% / 30% / 15% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? Schools split: 32% / 29% / 11% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Schools split: 50% / 29% / 12% Does history have a direction or meaning? Schools split: 37% / 23% / 19% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Schools split: 46% / 33% / 13% Does prayer change God's mind? Schools split: 46% / 33% / 13% How is knowledge of reality produced? Schools split: 25% / 17% / 13% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? Schools split: 46% / 33% / 13% Is memory stored or reconstructed? Schools split: 44% / 37% / 13% Is reality fundamentally digital? Schools split: 44% / 37% / 13% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? Schools split: 15% / 14% / 4% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Schools split: 65% / 16% / 10% What happens to "you" when you die? Schools split: 37% / 30% / 18% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Schools split: 44% / 16% / 14% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? Schools split: 40% / 28% / 14%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
← #1641 Journal of Discourses All Works #1643 Webster's First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language →