A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity
Stillingfleet's 1696 defence of Trinitarian orthodoxy against Unitarian and Socinian critiques
Tradition: Latitudinarian Anglicanism / Trinitarian apologetics
Stillingfleet's 1696 defence of Trinitarian orthodoxy — the work that drew him into open dispute with Locke
Published in 1696, 'A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, with an Answer to the Late Socinian Objections against It from Scripture, Antiquity, and Reason' is Stillingfleet's late-career defence of Trinitarian orthodoxy against the resurgent Unitarian-Socinian controversy of the 1690s. The Socinian controversy: the 1689 Toleration Act had effectively legalised most Protestant dissent in England (though formally Trinitarian dissent only); Unitarian-Socinian writers (Stephen Nye, John Biddle, the so-called 'Brief History of the Unitarians' tradition) began publishing more openly, arguing that Scripture does not actually teach the Nicene-Athanasian Trinity. Stillingfleet's response combines scriptural argument, patristic citation, and philosophical-metaphysical analysis. The book is structured in three parts: (I) Scriptural evidence for the Trinity (Old and New Testament passages, against Socinian re-readings); (II) Patristic-historical evidence (the early Church's Trinitarian commitments before Nicaea); (III) Philosophical-metaphysical analysis (the rational defensibility of the Trinitarian doctrine — how three persons can subsist in one substance). The third part's metaphysical analysis is what would draw Locke into the famous Locke-Stillingfleet exchange. Stillingfleet, in defending the Trinitarian language of 'substance' against Socinian challenges, suggested that John Locke's 1690 'Essay Concerning Human Understanding' had — through its account of substance as merely the supposed support of a collection of ideas — undermined the metaphysical vocabulary the Trinitarian doctrine requires. Locke replied (the 1697 'Letter to Stillingfleet'); Stillingfleet answered ('The Bishop of Worcester's Answer to Mr Locke's Letter', 1697); Locke replied again (1697); Stillingfleet answered again (1698) — the longest published philosophical exchange of Locke's life. The book is thus a major Trinitarian apologetic on its own terms and the proximate cause of one of the most important Locke-controversy exchanges of the 1690s.
Author
Editions cited
- A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (Henry Mortlock, London, 1696; 2nd edition 1697)
- In Stillingfleet, Works (London, 1710, 6 vols), vol. 3
- Companion volumes: The Bishop of Worcester's Answer to Mr Locke's Letter (1697); The Bishop of Worcester's Answer to Mr Locke's Second Letter (1698)
- Critical context: M. A. Stewart, 'Stillingfleet and the Way of Ideas', in his English Philosophy in the Age of Locke (Oxford, 2000); G. A. J. Rogers, Locke's Enlightenment (Olms, 1998)
School Embodiments
Major late-Restoration-Anglican Trinitarian apologetic.
"The Trinitarian doctrine stands upon Scripture, antiquity, and reason." (Vindication, preface)
Scholastic metaphysical vocabulary (substance, person, nature) defended against the new 'way of ideas'.
"The doctrine of the Trinity cannot be expressed without distinct ideas of substance." (Vindication, ch. 10)
Realism about substance, person, and metaphysical structure.
"Substance is not a mere word but the support of accidents." (Vindication, against Locke's later replies)
Rational-theological methodology in the defence.
"The mystery of the Trinity is above reason, not against it." (Vindication, ch. 1)
Confessional-Trinitarian framework.
"The Trinitarian doctrine is fundamental to the Christian religion." (Vindication, preface)
Natural-theological arguments in the Trinitarian defence.
"Reason, while it cannot prove the Trinity, can prepare for its acceptance." (Vindication, ch. 2)
Internal Tensions
The work that drew Locke into the longest extended philosophical exchange of his life. The four-round Locke-Stillingfleet exchange (1697-98) is one of the most important Locke-controversy documents and a major source for understanding the metaphysical implications of Locke's account of substance.
I. Time
1696. Stillingfleet was 61 and Bishop of Worcester (since 1689); he would die three years later in 1699.
Attributes
II. Space
London / Worcester — Stillingfleet held both the deanship of St Paul's (1678-89) and then the bishopric of Worcester (1689-99).
Attributes
III. Matter
Theological-apologetic treatise (~270 pages in original). Form is sustained essay in three parts.
Attributes
IV. Observer
Late Stillingfleet as defender of Trinitarian orthodoxy. The observer-bishop is at the height of his theological-political authority but engaging in the late-1690s' resurgent Unitarian controversy.
Attributes
V. Energy
Apologetic-controversial energies of the 1690s anti-Unitarian moment. The Toleration Act's loosening of dissent-restrictions had made the controversy more public.
Attributes
VI. Information
Single treatise plus the subsequent Locke exchange. The third-part metaphysical analysis is the most philosophically-influential material.
Attributes
Personas that cite this work
Personas with the nearest attribute fingerprint
Historical figures whose own classification on the same six-dimensional grid lands closest to this work's. Computed by attribute-agreement on coordinates both address.
Computed school proximity
The work's attribute fingerprint scored against all schools using the same quiz scorer. Useful as a sanity check on the hand-curated embodiments above.
How A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity resolves each dilemma
31 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 3 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way · 26 unaligned.
Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.
Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive
Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.