School #74

African Traditional Religion / Yoruba-Ifa

Orunmila, Ifa oral tradition

The Yoruba-Ifa tradition, one of the great religious and philosophical systems of West Africa, centers on the figure of Orunmila (the deity of wisdom and divination) and the Ifa corpus — an immense oral library of 256 odu (sacred verses), each containing hundreds of ese (poems, stories, prescriptions, and taboos) that encode the accumulated wisdom of countless generations. Ifa is simultaneously a divination system, a moral philosophy, a medical tradition, and a cosmology. The supreme deity, Olodumare (Owner of the Source of All Things), created the universe and delegated its governance to the orishas (divine beings) — Ogun (iron, technology, war), Oshun (rivers, love, fertility), Shango (thunder, justice), Eshu (crossroads, communication, trickery), and hundreds of others, each embodying a specific dimension of cosmic power. Ashe (also ase) is the fundamental ontological concept: the vital force, the power-to-make-things-happen, that flows through all of reality — gods, ancestors, human beings, animals, plants, rivers, and stones. Reality is a web of relationships among beings who share and exchange ashe; nothing exists in isolation. The human person is constituted by multiple spiritual components (ori, the personal destiny; emi, breath-soul; and several others), and one’s fate is negotiated before birth with Olodumare but can be modified through ritual, sacrifice, and the guidance of Ifa divination.

Worldview

The Yoruba-Ifa adherent inhabits a world that is alive with ashe (vital force), structured by relationships among orishas, ancestors, and the living community, and navigable through the ancient wisdom of the Ifa divination corpus. To hold this ontology is to feel that no person exists in isolation: every individual is embedded in a web of reciprocal obligations to family, community, ancestors, and divine beings. The fundamental orientation is one of relational attunement: reality is not a collection of inert objects but a dynamic field of powers that must be negotiated through ritual, sacrifice, and the guidance of the babalawo. One's destiny (ori) is chosen before birth but remains flexible, responsive to the quality of one's relationships and the wisdom of one's choices. The framework reads this as Spirit-relational metaphysical agency: the orisa are real, particular divine agents who hear divination, accept offerings, and act in the world — alongside Olodumare's more distant high-god role, the lived ontology is densely populated by personal spirits. The framework reads this as Experience-grounded moral authority: Ifa divination, possession, dream, and direct relation with the orisa are the proving ground; the odu corpus and the babalawo's lineage are honored as carriers of accumulated experience, but the live encounter — divined, danced, embodied — is the test.

Moral Implications

The ethical framework of Yoruba-Ifa is grounded in the concept of iwa pele (gentle character) and the maintenance of right relationship with the community, the ancestors, and the orishas. Moral failure is understood as a disruption of relational harmony that has consequences not only for the individual but for the entire community. The Ifa corpus provides detailed ethical guidance through its 256 odu, each containing stories, proverbs, and prescriptions that address specific moral situations. Responsibility is communal and intergenerational: one is accountable not only to the living but to the ancestors and the unborn, and the neglect of ritual obligations can bring misfortune upon the entire lineage.

Practical Implications

Practically, Yoruba-Ifa shapes a rich culture of divination, sacrifice, festival, and artistic expression. The babalawo (Ifa priest) serves as counselor, healer, and intermediary between the human and divine worlds. The tradition's emphasis on the sacredness of the natural world, with rivers as Oshun, iron as Ogun, and thunder as Shango, generates an ecological consciousness in which environmental destruction is understood as an offense against the orishas. Yoruba-Ifa's global diaspora through the transatlantic slave trade produced Candomble, Santeria, and Vodou, making it one of the most widespread and resilient religious systems in the world.

I. Time

Time is infinite, relational, and cyclical — constituted by the rhythms of birth, death, and rebirth within the family lineage rather than existing as an abstract, independent container. The ancestors participate in the present; the unborn are already part of the community; and the living are the bridge between them. Time is multi-directional: the past is not merely behind but actively present in the lives of the living through ancestral influence, and the future is not merely ahead but already negotiated in the pre-birth destiny (ori). Freedom is non-deterministic: although ori is chosen before birth, Ifa divination reveals how to modify, fulfill, or redirect one’s destiny through sacrifice and ethical action.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Relational Grain: Continuous Freedom: Non-Deterministic Traversability: Cyclical Dimensionality: One Direction: Multi-directional

II. Space

Space is finite, relational, and curved — constituted by the sacred geography of the Yoruba world: the marketplace, the crossroads (sacred to Eshu), the river (sacred to Oshun), the forest (domain of Ogun). Space is non-local: the visible world (aye) and the invisible world (orun) interpenetrate; orishas and ancestors move freely between them, and the crossroads is the point of maximum permeability. The curvature of space reflects the Yoruba cosmological model: orun (heaven) is not above aye (earth) but surrounds and interpenetrates it, like the interior and exterior of a calabash.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Curvature: Curved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

III. Matter

Matter is finite, relational, and conserved — the material world is alive with ashe and constituted by relationships among beings rather than by inert substance. Rivers, stones, trees, and iron are not merely physical objects but embodiments of orisha power: the river is Oshun, the thunderstone is Shango, the iron ore is Ogun. Matter is conserved: the natural world persists and renews itself through cycles. It is non-local: material things are connected to their spiritual counterparts through invisible bonds of ashe; a sacred object (an orisha’s shrine, a divination tool) participates in the orisha’s power regardless of spatial distance.

Attributes
Extent: Finite Ontological Status: Relational Conservation: Conserved Dimensionality: Three Locality: Non-local

IV. Observer

The human observer in Yoruba-Ifa is a complex being constituted by multiple spiritual components — ori (personal destiny/inner head), emi (breath-soul), ojiji (shadow), and others — that together form a person situated in a web of relationships with orishas, ancestors, and the natural world. Time instance is multiple: the ancestors (egungun) remain active participants in the lives of the living, and the soul may be reborn within the family lineage (the name "Babatunde" — "father returns" — reflects this belief). Space instance is multiple: the observer moves between the visible world (aye) and the invisible world (orun), and ancestors and orishas regularly cross this boundary through possession, dreams, and divination. Knowledge is immediate: human beings cannot know the full scope of reality on their own and must consult Ifa divination to access the wisdom of Orunmila. Knowledge retainment is total: the Ifa corpus preserves the accumulated wisdom of all generations, and the ancestral memory of the lineage is maintained through ritual and oral tradition. Physicality is both: the observer is embodied in this life but the spiritual components (ori, emi) transcend the body and persist across lifetimes. Agency is active: while ori (personal destiny) is chosen before birth, it can be modified through sacrifice, ritual, and the guidance of Ifa; human beings are active participants in shaping their fate. Number is plural: reality is communal — no person exists apart from their relationships with family, community, ancestors, and orishas.

Attributes
Time Instance: Multiple Space Instance: Multiple Extent of Knowledge: Immediate Retainment of Knowledge: Total Physicality: Both Agency: Active Number: Plural Metaphysical Agency: Spirit-relational Moral Authority: Experience Theological Method: Mystical

V. Energy

Energy is infinite, substantival, and identical with ashe — the vital force that flows through all of reality, animate and inanimate. Ashe is the power-to-make-things-happen: it is what enables the orishas to act, what gives efficacy to ritual and sacrifice, what makes herbs heal and thunder strike. Ashe is not created or destroyed but flows, concentrates, and redistributes through the web of relationships that constitutes reality. Conservation holds: ashe is conserved across the cosmic system; sacrifice transfers ashe from one being to another but does not create it from nothing. Dispersibility is reversible: ashe that has been depleted or misdirected can be restored through proper ritual, sacrifice, and the guidance of Ifa divination; the babalawo (priest of Ifa) is a specialist in the redirection and restoration of ashe.

Attributes
Extent: Infinite Ontological Status: Substantival Conservation: Conserved Dispersibility: Reversible

VI. Information

Information is substantival, conserved, and discrete — the 256 odu of the Ifa corpus are the fundamental informational units of reality. Each odu is a distinct, indivisible body of knowledge containing specific verses, stories, prescriptions, and taboos. The divination process (using the opele chain or ikin palm nuts) produces binary outcomes that identify specific odu, making this one of the clearest cases of discrete information encoding in any religious system. Information is conserved: the Ifa corpus is transmitted from master to student in an unbroken oral chain spanning centuries, and the babalawo is trained to memorize and recite vast bodies of verse without loss. The odu encode not just human wisdom but the structure of reality itself — they are Orunmila’s record of how the cosmos was created and ordered. The framework places this as conserved at both scales: the 256 odu are eternal informational units preserving cosmic wisdom, and at the personal-identity scale each person's ori (destiny-soul) is conserved — it returns to Olodumare and may incarnate again within the lineage.

Attributes
Ontological Status: Substantival Cosmic Conservation: Conserved Personal Conservation: Conserved Granularity: Discrete

Films Reading Through This School (1)

← #73 Manichaeism All Schools #75 Deism →

Works that name African Traditional Religion / Yoruba-Ifa in their embodiments

Foundational texts that draw on this school, with each work's declared weight.

60%
The Odu Ifá Corpus
Anonymous / composite — the babaláwo (Ifá priest) tradition across centuries; the corpus is principally oral but partially transcribed and translated since the 19th century · Pre-literate origins (possibly Old Oyo era, c. 12th-16th century CE); ongoing oral tradition; partial transcription from the 19th century onward
30%
Death and the King's Horseman (Mid (the major play of Soyinka's career))
Wole Soyinka · 1975
30%
Myth, Literature and the African World (Mid)
Wole Soyinka · 1976
25%
The Lion and the Jewel (Early)
Wole Soyinka · 1959
20%
Aké: The Years of Childhood (Mid)
Wole Soyinka · 1981
20%
African Religions and Philosophy (Mid)
John S. Mbiti · 1969 (2nd edn 1990)
10%
Beloved (Mid (the Pulitzer-winning major novel))
Toni Morrison · 1987
10%
Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective (Late)
Kwasi Wiredu · 1996
10%
Toward the African Revolution (Late)
Frantz Fanon · 1952-1961 essays; 1964 (collection)
10%
Long Walk to Freedom (Late)
Nelson Mandela · 1994
5%
The Wretched of the Earth (Late)
Frantz Fanon · 1961 (French; English 1963)
5%
Black Skin, White Masks (Early)
Frantz Fanon · 1952 (French; English 1967)
5%
Culture and Imperialism (Late)
Edward W. Said · 1993
5%
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (Early)
bell hooks · 1984
5%
Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza (Mid)
Gloria Anzaldúa · 1987
5%
The Idea of Latin America (Late)
Walter D. Mignolo · 2005
5%
The Souls of Black Folk (Mid)
W.E.B. Du Bois · 1903
5%
Women, Race & Class (Mid)
Angela Y. Davis · 1981
5%
Black Feminist Thought (Mid)
Patricia Hill Collins · 1990 (2nd edn 2000)
5%
One Hundred Years of Solitude (Cien años de soledad) (Mid)
Gabriel García Márquez · 1967
5%
The Sound and the Fury (Mid)
William Faulkner · 1929
5%
The Autobiography of Malcolm X (Late)
Malcolm X with Alex Haley · 1965

Personas with African Traditional Religion / Yoruba-Ifa as a declared influence

50%  Wole Soyinka 20%  Toni Morrison 15%  Audre Lorde 15%  Sun Ra (Herman Poole Blount)

How African Traditional Religion / Yoruba-Ifa resolves each dilemma

57 resolved positions across 4 dimensions, including 37 distinctive where the majority of schools go the other way.

Each dimension is sorted so minority positions come first. Mainstream positions are folded into an expandable list.

Time · 9 dilemmas · 3 distinctive

Persistence, the future, and the direction of becoming.

Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
How much weight do future people deserve?
If a billion people will exist in the 25th century, do their interests count for as much as the interests of a billion people alive now? The answer turns on what kind of reality the future has.
Past, present, and future are bound in cycles — duties span generations as a matter of course.
On these views, time is not a one-way arrow but a structure of return: cosmic cycles, karmic cycles, the seasons, the succession of generations. To act now is always also to act for the ancestors who shaped your inheritance and for the descendants who will …
Roads not taken Future people are as real as you are — and their interests count for as much. (47%) · Time arises from events or from a deeper substrate — the future is not yet. (31%) · The future branches — what we owe depends on which branch we create. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Is regret rational?
If the past is fixed and unchangeable, what kind of mental act is regret? An error, a duty, a lesson, a perspective on a moment that is still in some sense present?
The past is part of a cycle one keeps returning to; regret is one of the gates of the cycle.
On cyclical views, the past is not a fixed thing behind you — it is part of the ongoing structure of return: karmic cycles, cosmic cycles, the cycle of seasons and generations. Regret, on these views, is less about an unchangeable past and more about …
Roads not taken The past is as real as the present; regret is a real attitude toward a real thing. (47%) · The past is not a thing now; regret is the present holding what is no longer. (31%) · Other branches exist; regret tracks roads not taken that are nonetheless real. (2%)
Distinctive · only 18% of schools agree (38/208)
Do we owe extinct species something we cannot give them?
A species that no longer exists cannot be helped, cannot be consulted, cannot benefit. Whether anything is owed to it anyway turns on what kind of reality past beings have.
Past beings are part of the cycle; we owe them what we owe ancestors.
On cyclical views, the relationship to past beings — ancestors, lineages, predecessors — is structurally present, because past and future are part of the same ongoing structure of return. Extinct species are not categorically different from extinct human ancestors or non-yet-born descendants: all are part …
Roads not taken Extinct species are as real as we are; they have standing. (47%) · Past species no longer exist; what we owe is to the present and the future. (31%) · Extinction is path-dependent; the species exists in branches we didn't take. (2%)
6 mainstream positions

Matter · 7 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

What stuff is — fundamental, relational, or appearance.

Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is money?
The question of what money is — a measured store of real value, an agreed-on practice, a relational ledger of debts, or just a name we apply to many different things — sits behind every argument about inflation, cryptocurrency, debt, and the state.
Money is the ledger of obligations among real people.
On relational views, money is not a substance you have; it is a record of who owes whom what. Debts and credits are real because the relations they track are real — to kin, to community, to ancestors, to land. Money is the form this …
Roads not taken Money is a real institution with intrinsic features. (55%) · Money is a social practice — its content is what we make it. (16%) · “Money” names a family of practices — the definition question is nominal. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What is a nation?
Whether a nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character, a constructed legal-political artifact, a web of kinship and shared history, an imagined community, or a conventional partition of a deeper unity — these are real ontological positions with sharply different political downstream.
A nation is the web of kinship, ancestry, and shared land that hosts a people.
On relational views, the nation is the relational fabric — extended kinship, ancestral inheritance, shared ecology, communal practice — that hosts a people across generations. Borders matter less than belonging; lineage and land carry the weight that political structures only ratify.
Roads not taken A nation is a real moral community with intrinsic character. (55%) · A nation is a constructed polity — a project, not a discovery. (16%) · “Nation” names a family of practices imaginatively held together. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
What makes someone male or female?
Whether sex is a real biological kind, a constructed social category, a relational identity, a label applied to varied phenomena, or a conventional distinction within a deeper unity is the ontological question the contemporary dispute about gender is mostly about.
Sex and gender are constituted by relations of recognition.
On relational views, identity is not a property a person has alone; it is constituted by the web of recognition the person sits in. What makes someone a man or a woman in any thick sense is the relations of kinship, community, ritual, and recognition …
Roads not taken Sex is a real biological kind with given content. (55%) · Gender is constructed; what counts as male or female reflects practice. (16%) · “Male” and “female” are family-resemblance terms — no single essence. (8%)
Distinctive · only 14% of schools agree (30/208)
Should we edit the human germline?
Whether human nature is a given biological kind, a constructed category, a relational achievement, a family-resemblance cluster, or a conventional distinction within deeper unity is the ontological question the policy debate over heritable gene editing is mostly about.
Personhood is constituted by relations of descent and kinship; germline editing reshapes the relational fabric.
On relational views, what makes someone a person is the web of kinship, ancestry, and community they sit in — not a property the body carries alone. Heritable editing intervenes in exactly this fabric: the lineage that ancestors handed on, the descent that descendants will …
Roads not taken Human nature is a real biological kind given by reproductive biology or by creation; editing the germline transgresses what is given. (55%) · The categories we count as 'human' are emergent from practice; germline editing is a practice-revision like any other. (16%) · 'Human nature' is a cluster term without a single essence; the editing question is empirical, not metaphysical. (8%)
Distinctive · only 16% of schools agree (33/208)
Is the world created from nothing?
Creatio ex nihilo is one of the most distinctive Western-theological claims. Whether matter was created from nothing, eternally exists, or is sustained moment-by-moment turns on what kind of thing matter is.
Matter is constituted by relations; the question of 'from what?' presupposes substance.
On this view, matter is not a stuff but a patterning — the standing relations among things, ancestors, processes, and places. The creatio-ex-nihilo question doesn't quite arise, because the ontology has no slot for a free-standing substance to be created or eternal. What persists is …
Roads not taken Yes — matter was created and is conserved as a real substance. (56%) · Matter is real but emerges from something deeper — neither bedrock nor created-from-nothing. (23%) · Matter arises and dissolves through cosmic rounds; neither created from nothing nor eternal. (4%)
2 mainstream positions

Observer · 37 dilemmas · 5 distinctive

Mind, agency, and the knower's relation to the known.

Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (14/208)
Can prayer for someone far away affect them?
If you pray for a friend in another city, can the prayer reach them? The answer turns less on whether distance can be spanned than on whether anything beyond natural causation is doing the spanning.
Prayer reaches through ancestors, kami, or the spirits active in the world.
On this view, prayer is intelligible because the world includes spirits, ancestors, and energetic presences with whom petitioners stand in real relation. The prayer addresses these — particular kami, named ancestors, the orisha — rather than (or alongside) a single transcendent God. The practice is …
Roads not taken Prayer changes the pray-er, not the prayed-for. (47%) · Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. (38%) · There are no truly separate minds; prayer is one part of one talking to another. (8%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (14/208)
Are coincidences ever more than coincidence?
Thinking of someone and hearing from them moments later. Two friends humming the same obscure song at the same moment in different cities. Whether such patterns ever carry meaning depends on whether the world contains any ordering agency beyond chance.
Coincidence is the world speaking through spirits, ancestors, or signs.
On this view, what looks like coincidence is often the action of specific spirits or ancestors making themselves present — an omen, a sign, a felt arrival. The framework for reading such events is rich and particular: which spirit, what message, what response is fitting. …
Roads not taken Coincidence is exactly what the math says it is. The pattern is in the noticer. (47%) · What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. (38%) · Coincidence is the One showing through the appearance of plurality. (8%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (14/208)
Is reality fundamentally digital?
Pancomputationalism, Planck-scale quanta, simulation theory and Kabbalistic letter-mysticism all say yes — but for very different reasons. The rest of the atlas says no.
Yes — but divinely-discrete: divine letters, momentary cognitions, atomistic theism.
On this view, the world is at bottom discrete, but the units are not bare bits. They are divine names, momentary cognitions, karmic atoms, sacred letters — the elementary acts of a creating or ordering agency. Discreteness is real and fundamental, and so is the …
Roads not taken No — continuous divine sustaining act, the Tao that knows no joints, the One's self-disclosure. (44%) · No — continuous fields, classical limits, analog deep structure. (36%) · Yes — bits, quanta, computational substrate. (13%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (14/208)
Are there indivisible units of experience?
Whiteheadian actual occasions, Buddhist moments of mind, Kabbalistic letter-cognitions, IIT phi-units — or the unbroken Jamesian stream? The atomism of experience cuts across naturalism and theism alike.
Yes, theistic atomism — actual occasions, divine letters, momentary cognitions.
On this view, the atoms of experience are not bare quanta but agent-laden moments: Whiteheadian actual occasions in which subjectivity and the divine lure meet, Kabbalistic letter-cognitions in which divine names act, Buddhist Abhidharma moments of mind, tantric ksana. The discreteness is real and so …
Roads not taken No — continuous divine presence; consciousness is the unbroken witness. (44%) · No — continuous Jamesian stream, phenomenological lived time. (36%) · Yes — naturalist quanta of experience. (13%)
Distinctive · only 7% of schools agree (14/208)
Is memory stored or reconstructed?
Engrams and traces — or continuous re-narration each time you remember? The cognitive-science debate has a theological cousin: divine memory holding each hair, or the ancestors' continuous remembering.
Stored — in divine memory's discrete particulars, or in karmic-record units.
On this view, memory is held in discrete particulars by an agency: the Lord who knows each hair, the karmic ledger that records each act, the angelic scribe who writes each deed, the Kabbalistic letters that spell each soul. Storage is real; the storer is …
Roads not taken Held in continuous divine or ancestral remembering — neither stored discretely nor purely reconstructed. (44%) · Reconstructed — continuous re-narrating, no fixed engrams. (36%) · Stored — discrete engrams, traces, weights. (13%)
32 mainstream positions
What makes someone the same person over time? You span moments — identity is a pattern that need not be located at a single now. 9% Is the late-stage dementia patient still the person their spouse married? The person is the pattern across moments — diminished pattern, diminished person. 9% If a teleporter copied and destroyed you, would you have survived? You are the pattern; the pattern survives the substrate change. You arrive. 9% Is truth universal, tradition-bound, situated, or constructed? Truth is real but accessible only from within a tradition. 10% Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally? Distance doesn't dilute obligation; what is real is the connection, not its length. 12% Are the dead morally present to the living? Observers span moments; the dead are present in a real (not merely metaphorical) way. 12% Is divine omniscience compatible with human freedom? An observer can occupy multiple times at once; foreknowledge is not foreordering. 12% Does meditation reveal something genuinely timeless? Meditation accesses a trans-temporal level the ordinary observer doesn't ordinarily reach. 12% Does prayer change God's mind? Prayer participates in a trans-temporal liturgy or communion; the question of 'changing the mind' misses the trans-temporal mode. 12% When does a person begin? Personhood is conferred by being-in-relation. 14% What is marriage? Marriage is constituted by the web of relations it creates. 14% What is our place in nature? Embedded in a web — partners with the more-than-human world. 14% Should we colonize space? Colonisation continues the work that ended the wisdom of seven-generation thinking. 14% Is genetic engineering of food stewardship or domination? Editing the genome cuts into the relational fabric; we should be very slow. 14% What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize? Direct experiential union is the authority. 16% Does history have a direction or meaning? History recurs in cosmic cycles. 17% Is environmental damage ever truly permanent? Loss is part of cycles; what disappears returns in another form. 18% Can a civilization recover from collapse? Civilization rises and falls in cycles; recovery is structural to history. 18% Does the second law of thermodynamics mean something morally? Local entropy increase is part of a cycle; the moral category is participation in the cycle. 18% Could causation work backwards? Time is structured as return; 'forward' and 'backward' are local features of the cycle. 18% Is the asymmetry between memory and anticipation a real feature of time, or just of us? Memory and anticipation are phases of a cycle that visits both directions. 18% Is the arrow of time a real feature of the cosmos, or only of how we describe it? Within a cycle there is a direction; across the cycle there isn't. 18% What happens to "you" when you die? A soul continues into another mode of being. 38% Who is the moral primary — the individual, the community, the cosmos, the class, or the species? The community of persons is the moral primary. 28% Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it? Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. 17% Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge? What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. 17% Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces? An LLM has no first-person experience, so no knowing in the relevant sense. 17% Could an AI have a mind that matters? An AI’s standing is constituted by the relations it enters. 14% Is salvation, liberation, or fulfillment individual or communal? The community is saved together or not at all. 14% How is knowledge of reality produced? Through direct contemplative union with reality. 13% Do animals have moral standing comparable to humans? An animal's standing is constituted by its place in the relational fabric. 11% Could a fetal brain organoid in a petri dish be conscious? The organoid's standing is constituted by the relations of care around its production. 11%
Information · 4 dilemmas, all mainstream
Jump to school (208)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79 #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87 #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111 #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 #128 #129 #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 #140 #141 #142 #143 #144 #145 #146 #147 #148 #149 #150 #151 #152 #153 #154 #155 #156 #157 #158 #159 #160 #161 #162 #163 #164 #165 #166 #167 #168 #169 #170 #171 #172 #173 #174 #175 #176 #177 #178 #179 #180 #181 #182 #183 #184 #185 #186 #187 #188 #189 #190 #191 #192 #193 #194 #195 #196 #197 #198 #199 #200 #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208