Dilemma
What kind of religious-theological authority does the tradition recognize?
Religious traditions differ not only in what they believe, but in how authority is structured — and what counts as the right kind of argument.
Context
Religious traditions can be sorted by the structure of their theological authority: magisterial-institutional (Catholic, Orthodox, Baháʼí), confessional creedal-scriptural (Reformed, Lutheran, Evangelical, LDS, Zoroastrian), existential (Christian existentialism), conversionist (Pure Land tariki, Pentecostal), critical-historical (liberal theology, Deism), mystical (Sufism, Kabbalah, Advaita, Zen), process-relational (process theology), pragmatic-civic (Confucian ritual, civic Deism).
Why it matters
The kind of theological authority a tradition recognizes governs almost everything about its public face — what counts as a binding doctrinal claim, what role experience plays against tradition, who has the standing to settle disputes, and whether reform is restoration, progress, or apostasy.
The coordinates that split the schools
The stances
Institutional teaching tradition is the authority.
27 schoolsScripture, tradition, and the institutional magisterium together carry revealed truth.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. on Can prayer for someone far away affect them?
- 1% What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. on Are coincidences ever more than coincidence?
- 1% Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. on Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it?
- 1% Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. on Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge?
- 1% An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. on Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces?
Creedal documents and Scripture-as-doctrine are the authority.
12 schoolsSola scriptura plus binding creedal confessions; the text is final.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. on Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it?
- 1% Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. on Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge?
- 1% An LLM has no soul to whom revelation could be addressed; the question doesn't apply. on Does an LLM 'know' the things it correctly produces?
- 1% Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. on Can prayer for someone far away affect them?
- 1% What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. on Are coincidences ever more than coincidence?
Personal decision or conversion experience is the authority.
9 schoolsFaith is constituted in the moment of personal encounter or conversion.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Prayer reaches because God or a cosmic ordering acts on the prayed-for. on Can prayer for someone far away affect them?
- 1% What looks like coincidence is providence — there is no such thing as a real coincidence. on Are coincidences ever more than coincidence?
- 1% Distance doesn't dilute obligation; communion of saints / divine relation spans the cosmos. on Does environmental harm in another country bind me morally?
- 1% Defer to credentialed traditions; experts are the modern analog. on Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it?
- 1% Revelation is the paradigm case of authoritative knowledge. on Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge?
Historical-critical method is the authority.
21 schoolsReligious claims are evaluated by the same critical-historical standards as any other claim.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
Direct experiential union is the authority.
32 schoolsThe mystic's immediate disclosure is the test; text and tradition are honored guides.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% The future is open and you are a genuine origin of it. on Do you really choose?
- 1% The addict could have chosen otherwise — that's why recovery is real. on Are addicts responsible for their addiction?
- 1% An AI without a free will is not the kind of thing that can be responsible. on Should we hold AI systems responsible for what they do?
- 1% Trust expertise only insofar as it coheres with first-person experience. on Should we trust expert testimony when we can't verify it?
- 1% What gets called 'revelation' is real direct experience — not a text. on Is religious revelation a real source of knowledge?
Civic ritual or pragmatic moral function is the authority.
4 schoolsReligion's authority is its public-civic function, not its metaphysical claims.
Where this stance leads ⓘ
- 1% Time is unbounded but matter is finite; usable energy can fail without time failing. on Is the universe running out of usable energy?
- 1% Time goes on but matter is bounded; we are eventually constrained even with infinite time. on Are natural resources fundamentally finite, or only practically so?
- 1% Time is unbounded but matter is not; we can owe more across long time than the matter can provide. on Could we owe future generations more than is materially possible to provide?
- 1% The future is open and you are a genuine origin of it. on Do you really choose?
- 1% The addict could have chosen otherwise — that's why recovery is real. on Are addicts responsible for their addiction?
The category does not apply — the school is non-religious.
82 schoolsThere is no religious-theological authority structure to debate.
Schools the coordinates don't place
These schools don't satisfy any stance's coordinate pattern strongly enough to be assigned — either because they decline to commit on the question (Confucianism is famously silent on what comes after; Pyrrhonian and pragmatist traditions suspend judgment), or because their attribute signature crosses categories in a way the five buckets don't capture.
Related Experiments
Experiments engaging the same dimensions as this dilemma — they\'re where the same questions get stress-tested in cleaner cases.
Related Historical Debates
Historical confrontations where parties argued out questions on these dimensions.